Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Running of the fine structure constant - how exactly?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
frank_k_sheldon@yahoo.co.uk - 27 Jun 2008 12:32 GMT
The fine structure constant alpha is said to be running
with energy as (from various QED textbooks)

1/alpha(E) = 1/alpha - (1/3 pi) ln (E^2/m^2)

where m is the electron mass, ln the natural logarithm,
and alpha without index is 1/137.036.

But many papers mention that at 90 Gev, alpha is around 1/128.
This is in contradiction with the above formula, which would give
a value of around 133 at 90 GeV.

Is the discrepancy due to the fact that the formula
misses the hadronic corrections?

As a result, what value is expected for alpha at
10^19GeV? Where can one look this up?

Frank
tnlockyer@aol.com - 28 Jun 2008 16:52 GMT
On Jun 27, 4:32�am, frank_k_shel...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> The fine structure constant alpha is said to be running
> with energy as (from various QED textbooks)
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Frank

Frank, the fine structure constant is, by definition, the
dimensionless ratio between the electron's electrical potential energy
and rest mass energy.   It is unlikely that alpha could "run" with
energy because it is set by the geometry of  the electron.

There is another famous dimensionless constant "PI" that is also an
irrational number (goes on forevver without end) that shows these
constants are based on geometric ratios.

I think you are on the right path in looking for some correction to
the measurement methods.  The running of their measurement has to be
an artifact of their measurement methods.

See;    http://members.aol.com/tnlockyer/CHARGESPIN.pdf

Hope the link works,

Regards, Tom
John C. Polasek - 29 Jun 2008 02:50 GMT
>On Jun 27, 4:32?am, frank_k_shel...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>> The fine structure constant alpha is said to be running
>> with energy as (from various QED textbooks)

snip
>Frank, the fine structure constant is, by definition, the
>dimensionless ratio between the electron's electrical potential energy
>and rest mass energy.   It is unlikely that alpha could "run" with
>energy because it is set by the geometry of  the electron.

It might be instructive if you stated the two quantities whose ratio
is alpha. I have alpha = e^2/2hceps0 but can't see your ratio there.

>There is another famous dimensionless constant "PI" that is also an
>irrational number (goes on forevver without end) that shows these
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>Regards, Tom
tnlockyer@aol.com - 29 Jun 2008 18:18 GMT
> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:52:40 -0700 (PDT), "tnlock...@aol.com"
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> >and rest mass energy. � It is unlikely that alpha could "run" with
> >energy because it is set by the geometry of �the electron.

Frank says;
> It might be instructive if you stated the two quantities whose ratio
> is alpha. I have alpha = e^2/2hceps0 but can't see your ratio there.

Your equation is in obselete cgs units, Frank.

The International MetricSystem (SI) is the modern language of science,
and I find it more intuitive.

See the following link I gave you, Figure 4, left panel bottom
calculation.

The fine structure constant can be derived from a number of different
math equations but all are traceable to the geometry, as demonstrated
by the derivation shown.

Alpha= (Flux x 2 x e)/ h

>snip<

> >I think you are on the right path in looking for some correction to
> >the measurement methods. �The running of their measurement has to be
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> >Regards, Tom-  -

P.S.  See;  www.amazon.com     096315463X   for more information.
John C. Polasek - 30 Jun 2008 04:21 GMT
>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:52:40 -0700 (PDT), "tnlock...@aol.com"
>>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
>P.S.  See;  www.amazon.com     096315463X   for more information.
The link doesnt work.
John Polasek
tnlockyer@aol.com - 30 Jun 2008 17:47 GMT
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 10:18:28 -0700 (PDT), "tnlock...@aol.com"
>
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

John, The link requires you type

096315463X

in the top search block on the Amazon opening page, that should bring
up the book page.

Regards: Tom
John C. Polasek - 01 Jul 2008 00:50 GMT
>http://members.aol.com/tnlockyer/CHARGESPIN.pdf
Nope: did not recognize the link
tnlockyer@aol.com - 01 Jul 2008 01:52 GMT
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:47:23 -0700 (PDT), "tnlock...@aol.com"
>
> <tnlock...@aol.com> wrote:
> >http://members.aol.com/tnlockyer/CHARGESPIN.pdf
>
> Nope: did not recognize the link

John, cannot ubderstand why.  The link works for me. Do you have a pdf
reader?

Try also;

http://www.members.aol.com/tnlockyer/CHARGESPIN.pdf

Regards; Tom.
Jay Bala - 01 Jul 2008 03:55 GMT
A while back, I came up with something that defined alpha, the fine
structure constant, in terms of geometry and Chaos Theory constants:
Its an irrational number:

alpha=7.29 735 257 240 051 31... x10^-3
1/alpha=137.035 999 025 471 68...

Regards,
Jay Bala.

> There is another famous dimensionless constant "PI" that is also an
> irrational number (goes on forevver without end) that shows these
> constants are based on geometric ratios.
Jay Bala - 01 Jul 2008 04:22 GMT
Let me give you the equation:

Lets define,

1) 1/alphaPrime=((180*Phi)^2)/(20*pi^3)

2) For period doubling, as the limit approching infinity in chaos
theory:
Feigenbaum constant delta:
deltaF=delta Feigenbaum constant=4.66920....

3) For period doubling reduced from one doubling to the next,
converges to:
Feigenbaum constant alpha:
alphaF=alpha Feigenbaum constant=2.50290...

then,

1/alpha=1/alphaPrime+alphaF/10+sqrt(10/deltaF)

Rearranging the alphaPrime shows that its in fact a product of radians
and the golden ratio.

Regards,
Jay Bala.

> A while back, I came up with something that defined alpha, the fine
> structure constant, in terms of geometry and Chaos Theory constants:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> > irrational number (goes on forevver without end) that shows these
> > constants are based on geometric ratios.
Jay Bala - 02 Jul 2008 17:33 GMT
Rather, steradian: (180/pi)^2

Jay Bala.

> Lets define,
>
> 1) 1/alphaPrime=((180*Phi)^2)/(20*pi^3)
.
.
.
> Rearranging the alphaPrime shows that its in fact a product of radians
> and the golden ratio.
>
> Regards,
> Jay Bala.
Jay Bala - 05 Jul 2008 00:46 GMT
> Let me give you the equation:
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> 1/alpha=1/alphaPrime+alphaF/10+sqrt(10/deltaF)

Correction: 1/alpha=1/alphaPrime+alphaF/10+sqrt(10/deltaF)x10^-5

Regards,
Jay Bala.
Rock Brentwood - 02 Jul 2008 08:33 GMT
> alpha=7.29 735 257 240 051 31... x10^-3
> 1/alpha=137.035 999 025 471 68...

That's the low energy asymptotic value. As you ramp up the energy in a
scattering process and probe deeper into the field of a source, the
effective value of alpha increases. This occurs because the source
being probed by a scatting process actually deviates from Coulomb, as
you probe deeper into it. For electromagnetism, the effective
potential goes faster than 1/r, though it's 1/r when far-removed from
the source. There's a huge industry that is (and has long been around)
dedicated to the question of the inverse scattering problem
(reconstructing an image, here, the profile of the potential
surrounding a source, from the results of scattering done off the
source). One actually sees the effective alpha go up at high energies.

It's widely believed (but not a complete consensus) that theory
predicts, in fact, that it would approach infinity at a finite
positive radius. That's called the Landau Pole.

To some extent this may be classically modelled. On general
principles, one would expect an effective dynamics for the dielectric
coefficient epsilon to be given by an equation of the form
  [] log(epsilon_0) = -K epsilon_0 (E^2 - B^2 c^2)
for some positive constant K. This translates directly into an
equation d^2(log alpha)/d(1/r)^2 = k alpha, for some constant k. From
this you can get any of a wide variety of phases, including one that
replicates the features of the Landau Pole.

Other solutions, interestingly, include a phase where the effective
field E approaches a constant as r -> infinity, and alpha -> 0 as r ->
0. These features are called, respectively, "infrared slavery" and
"asymptotic freedom". For non-Abelian gauge fields (SU(3), here) it's
the basis of confinement that rules out the existence of monopole
sources. In this phase, sources with bounded fields can only exist as
dipoles or higher order multipoles (which includes, in SU(3), the 3-
body neutral sources with 3 charges bound to each other).

The 3-Way Kiss -- the Real Life Version
http://www.flickr.com/photos/confusedamused/20988689/
Sue... - 01 Jul 2008 00:56 GMT
On Jun 27, 7:32 am, frank_k_shel...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> The fine structure constant alpha is said to be running
> with energy as (from various QED textbooks)
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> As a result, what value is expected for alpha at
> 10^19GeV? Where can one look this up?

http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/alpha.html

Sue...

> Frank
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.