Black hole Paradigm shift leading to a TOE.
Something SMALL is wrong with physics if we look at the Hubble images
of our universe. This and other anomalies described in the book are a
firm reason to suggest a Higgs-Black hole nucleus PARADIGM SHIFT,
leading to a TOE. (Theory Of Everything)
Book: 230 pages, title: THE NEW GOD PARTICLE and FREE WILL, by Leo
Vuyk.
ISBN: 978-1-4092-1031-3.
See first 80 free pages:
http://www.lulu.com/browse/preview.php?fCID=2552961
Also sold as E-book.
CONTENTS
Foreword 1
Introduction 3
Part 1. Something small is wrong with physics 11
Evidence for splitting and pairing New Black holes
1.1. The basic idea 11
1.2. Some new definitions for NEW Black hole physics 21
1.3. Lee Smolin’s trouble with physics 25
1.4. Examples of splitting and pairing massless Black holes 26
1.5. The new Higgs-vacuum lensing Black hole 35
1.6. The New Black hole relation with Comets 43
1.7. Dark matter and New Black holes 47
1.8. The cyclic Raspberry Multiverse, Dark energy and matter 49
Part 2. The small scale, the God particle 55
The unification of particles and forces
2.1. The shape of the GOD particle 55
2.2. Simple sketches on particle- decay, spin and scattering 63
2.3. Evidence for dual magnetic Monopole radiation 65
2.4. The geometry of particle decay processes 73
2.5. Particle decay processes in detail 76
2.6. An alternative for Feynman diagrams 85
2.7. A New Polar-ring structure for Atom nuclei 87
2.8. Rigid Gluonium knots, Ball lightning and Free energy 89
Part 3. The large scale and the New Black hole. 93
Quantum Gravity.
3.1. Dual Higgs-Graviton pushing Quantum Gravity 93
3.2. Mass in motion and Inertia 96
3.3. Single Higgs Gravity around a New Black hole. 99
3.4. The Fermion repelling horizon of New Black holes 102
3.5. A new WHITE hole between two New Black holes 105
3.6. Galaxy form and formation 110
3.7. Sunspots and new micro Black holes 117
3.8. Gravity lensing by two Sunspot Black holes 120
Part 4. How the magic LASOF mimics relativity rules 127
Variable lightspeed and Fly-by Inertia
4.1. Short distance lightspeed anomalies and tests 127
4.2. Long distance lightspeed anomalies and tests 130
4.3. Dual satellite lightspeed test 136
4.4. The small minor axis of the magic LASOF ellipsoid 137
4.5. Periodic oscillations of Binary systems 139
4.6. The Fly-by anomaly 141
4.7. A simple GPS lightspeed experiment 143
4.8. The de Broglie Bohm-Bell interpretation 146
4.9. How the magic LASOF vacuum keeps C=constant 151
Part 5. Free Will 155
Variable Readiness Potentials and decision making
5.1. Is Less More in the symmetric Multiverse? 155
5.2. Free Will, the CPT symmetric Multiverse and
Benjamin Libet’s Readiness Potential 157
5.3. A Solar Toroidal Programmable ROM as a base for
our Intuition, Morphic fields and the Noösphere 162
5.4. Soul, Spirit, Mind and the Human STP-ROM 163
5.5. Reduced Free Will 165
5.6. Goals of intelligent life 167
5.7. Conclusions. 168
Part 6. Addendum of initial research results 181
Acknowledgement 228
Leo Vuyk.
LeoVuyk@gmail.com <LeoVuyk@gmail.com> wrote in message
b36e6dcb-c21d-4c38-9491-a8341831a7e0@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com
> Black hole Paradigm shift leading to a TOE.
>
> Something SMALL is wrong with physics if we look at the Hubble images
> of our universe. This and other anomalies described in the book are a
> firm reason to suggest a Higgs-Black hole nucleus PARADIGM SHIFT,
> leading to a TOE. (Theory Of Everything)
The term "paradigm shift" is only used by marketing people.
The term "PARADIGM SHIFT" only used by bombastic
marketing people.
Dirk Vdm
> Black hole Paradigm shift leading to a TOE.
Broke another bullshit meter. Gotta get a glycerin-damped gauge
model.
> Something SMALL is wrong with physics if we look at the Hubble images
> of our universe. This and other anomalies described in the book are a
> firm reason to suggest a Higgs-Black hole nucleus PARADIGM SHIFT,
> leading to a TOE. (Theory Of Everything)
Idiot.
1) No Higgs boson. The Standard Model fresh out of the box is
massless for a simple reason - it is wrong.
2) GR can NEVER be reconciled with quantum field theory because GR
is a continuous geometry, c=c, G=G, h=zero as opposed to c=c, G=zero,
h=h.
3) Derive gravitation as a gauge theory of translation with
spacetime torsion rather than curvature and it quantizes in
principle. Add the Beckenstein bound to thermodynamics and obtain
putatively quantizable gravitation. Pull on your Kaluza-Klein jeans.
> Book: 230 pages, title: THE NEW GOD PARTICLE and FREE WILL, by Leo
> Vuyk.
[snip crap]
But yer too stooopid to comprehend any of that. What you have is
20/2000 hindsight for somebody else's work that you also do not
comprehend.
Hey Vuyk - does your 230-page spew contain, like, you know,
equations? In a given local gravitational field, how does the
gravitational acceleration of matter compare with that of photons in
your spew?
> 1.4. Examples of splitting and pairing massless Black holes 26
Isn't that special!
> 1.8. The cyclic Raspberry Multiverse, Dark energy and matter 49
Strawberry Multiverse, stooopid - pips on the outside.
> 2.1. The shape of the GOD particle 55
The GOD particle has a quadrupole moment! Is it paisley or argyle?
> 2.7. A New Polar-ring structure for Atom nuclei 87
Yeah - atomic nuclei are hollow. That is why deep scattering
exerimennts show the projectiles whizzing through without scattering,
NOT.
> 2.8. Rigid Gluonium knots, Ball lightning and Free energy 89
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/htoo.htm
> 3.8. Gravity lensing by two Sunspot Black holes 120
Vuyk pulls the drain plug in his bathtub, twice, and the water does
not go down.
> 5.6. Goals of intelligent life 167
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/analysis.jpg

Signature
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
On Jun 28, 2:40 am, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Black hole Paradigm shift leading to a TOE.
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> 1.2. Some new definitions for NEW Black hole physics 21
> 1.3. Lee Smolin’s trouble with physics 25
>snip<
> Leo Vuyk.
Leo, your book is a work of art, but is not a paradigm shift.
Refer to your part >1.3 Lee Smolin's first sentences.
Thus;
Two problems I see with your work are (1) trying to include all of the
false starts of the standard model, and (2) not being able to derive
a single fundamental physical constant with your proposed structures.
See: http://members.aol.com/tnlockyer/CHARGESPIN.pdf
The above link is not a casual read, I suggest you print out the six
pages and study at your leasure.
These excerpts are examples of proof of concepts you should have had
in your book.
Regards: Tom.
LeoVuyk@gmail.com - 30 Jun 2008 20:27 GMT
On Jun 29, 2:20 am, "tnlock...@aol.com" <tnlock...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2:40 am, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Hi Tom,
see my proposal for up and down electron spin at:
http://www.lulu.com/browse/preview.php?fCID=2552961
see page on
LuLu sequence number : 71
real pasge number: 64.
Leo.
tnlockyer@aol.com - 01 Jul 2008 01:39 GMT
On Jun 30, 12:27 pm, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2:20 am, "tnlock...@aol.com" <tnlock...@aol.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
>
> Leo.- Hide quoted text -
Leo, if you read the CHARGESPIN.pdf you will see that spin is the
result of the unique structure of the electron and positron.
Up and down spin refers to isotopic spin space that Heisenberg
proposed to try and explain the difference between the proton and
neutron.
He did not know that the neutron has a magnetic moment vector that
gives it a negative spin reference.
So, up and down have no meaning in a modern sense.
Notice that my positron is the conjugate of the electron's EM
structure, so anti-matter is more aptly specified as conjugate matter.
This also explains the annihilation back into photons.
Please note the structures give us ALL of the known electron
fundamental constants, and some relationships previously unknown.
There can be only one correct structure for the electron and positron
and these derived constants prove that the presented ones are
correct.;
http://members.aol.com/tnlockyer/CHARGESPIN.pdf
Regards Tom.
http://www.amazon.com/Fundamental-Physical-Constants_Geometric-Structures/dp/096
315463X
.
LeoVuyk@gmail.com - 01 Jul 2008 16:24 GMT
On Jul 1, 2:39 am, "tnlock...@aol.com" <tnlock...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Jun 30, 12:27 pm, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 92 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Hi Tom,
Thank you for your positive support.
Did you found my pdf? in your mail?
Leo.