Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Some fun stuff to think about

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Spaceman - 30 Jun 2008 06:24 GMT
A non violation of conservation of energy fun.
:)

There is a river flowing along and just before a boat dock
there is a water flow of 1,000,000 million gpm
1: ) How much energy is that?

At the boat dock, there is a 60 ton boat and it
starts it way down the river letting the water push it
along the river for 100 miles.
2:) How much energy is need to do that?

100 miles later the boat comes across another dock
and parks and used up energy (the answer for #2)
to do so.

After the second boat dock,
The water flow is measured and it is still
1,000,000 million gpm.
3:) Is that still the same amount of energy as answer #1?

4:) Is that a violation or not?
(yes or no.)

5:) Where did the energy come from?

For those that wonder, I do know the answer but
please , no explanations yet and only answers
if you want to participate.
:)
This would be a fun classroom thing I think
to see what the students think.
:)

Signature

James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman

Spaceman - 01 Jul 2008 17:42 GMT
> A non violation of conservation of energy fun.
> :)
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> to see what the students think.
> :)

It seems nobody wanted to answer.
:)
The answers for 4 and 5 are
no violation, and gravity as where the energy came from.
If you have math that states the above problem is
a violation of the conservation of energy,
your math is incomplete.
Most likely it is missing the gravities energy parts.
:)

Signature

James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.