> > What regulation might that be? Other than you being a control freak,
> > of course.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Well, you can apply through Google site, and then I will send you a
> form.
Why do you have to send a form? I'm thinking "crazy f.ck & control
freak", but maybe there is a deeper truth.
> Once the applicant signs the form, I will register him/her.
...and how many people have asked for the form, much less signed it
and sent it to you?
Wait...sign the form? Are you actually asking for a physical
signature?
> Any breach of agreement might result in cancellation of the contract.
Be honest - do you really think people give a damn?
> (Generally a warning might be issued in advance to correct the
> situation).
>
> This is necessary for particularly the behavioral attitudes of
> applicants in language writing issues of postings.
Translation: bad words make me cry. Whiny bitch.
> For the future internationally global company, we need to have codes
> of conduct of its members.
Why?
The internet is self correcting.
> Dr.Mehran Basti
Mehran Basti - 04 Jul 2008 08:51 GMT
> Why?
>
> The internet is self correcting.
This is a form (regulations) I have as an owner of the company.
Either you sign it (just print your name) or you cannot be a member.
Dr.Mehran Basti
Eric Gisse - 04 Jul 2008 09:14 GMT
> > Why?
>
> > The internet is self correcting.
>
> This is a form (regulations) I have as an owner of the company.
What company? Is it "Batshit Craaazzzy LLC" ?
> Either you sign it (just print your name) or you cannot be a member.
Given the choice, it appears everyone has settled with "cannot be a
member". From time to time I look at the newsgroups you spam, and the
only one that is public has one member and it is you.
> Dr.Mehran Basti
Mehran Basti - 04 Jul 2008 09:28 GMT
> Given the choice, it appears everyone has settled with "cannot be a
> member". From time to time I look at the newsgroups you spam, and the
> only one that is public has one member and it is you.
This is an experimental site on Google, if number increases then I can
transfer it to a private site as a new company.
By the way currently Sci.physics is a closed site, if someone wants to
have it public, I will open up in the Google site as a separate
newsgroup.
So, I am not concerned if you signed in and got the form and did not
return it (I will delete your name after some time).
Those interested can sign it and have a quality newsgroup.
We have members in Sci.math. It takes some time.
Dr.Mehran Basti
Eric Gisse - 04 Jul 2008 10:48 GMT
> > Given the choice, it appears everyone has settled with "cannot be a
> > member". From time to time I look at the newsgroups you spam, and the
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> We have members in Sci.math. It takes some time.
Really?
Why don't you open up the newsgroup for viewing so we can see these
members?
> Dr.Mehran Basti
Mehran Basti - 04 Jul 2008 11:23 GMT
> Why don't you open up the newsgroup for viewing so we can see these
> members?
Only Sci.math has members, and there was a membership request for
Sci.physics.
Both are closed sites. There are some advantages for these type-sites;
some do not like to go public.
This might be useful for school teachers and their students and
university professors.
We do not have a public Sci. physics yet.
Once members signed a contract for a closed site, it cannot be
changed.
An open site requires different contract to be signed.
I can open up Basti Newsgroup: Sci.physics (public), if someone
requests it (please contact me).
I opened up Sci.Comp (public) since someone requested it but did not
return the form.
Indeed we had many members signed in for Sci.math but did not return
the form.
Those sign the form will have quality newsgroup membership.
If they behave normally there should not be any problems at all,
indeed they are in control of their postings not me.
The quality is the first we put in.
Dr.M.Basti
Eric Gisse - 04 Jul 2008 14:08 GMT
> > Why don't you open up the newsgroup for viewing so we can see these
> > members?
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> Dr.M.Basti
Crazy people are entertaining from a distance.
john - 04 Jul 2008 18:41 GMT
> > > Why don't you open up the newsgroup for viewing so we can see these
> > > members?
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> Crazy people are entertaining from a distance.
Which is why I read your posts, Eric.
(Occasionally.)
John