The Universe was designed for kindness and good.
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Osmium - 06 Jul 2008 03:18 GMT We are a meat eating mammal that nurtures our young. The "universe" designed us that way. When we kill a deer to eat there is "goodness"---we can feed our families and it tastes good. At the same time there is evil (from the deer's point of view.). When we have a child, or even when we encounter our neighbor's children, we treat them with kindness. This helps propogate our genes, promotes social cohesion--and feels good too. Whether god, or natural selection, programmed this into us--it shows this is not an absurd and meaningless universe. In some small way the supporters of intelligent design are right, the universe was designed to include goodness and truth.
BURT - 06 Jul 2008 03:32 GMT > We are a meat eating mammal that nurtures our young. The "universe" > designed us that way. When we kill a deer to eat there is [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > supporters of intelligent design are right, the universe was designed > to include goodness and truth. The universe isn't God. Einstein said it himself: I want to know how God created this universe. I want to know His thoughts. All the rest are just details.
Mitch Raemsch
Osmium - 06 Jul 2008 05:55 GMT > > We are a meat eating mammal that nurtures our young. �The "universe" > > designed us that way. �When we kill a deer to eat there is [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Mitch Raemsch The universe is god if god is omni(all those things).
Don Stockbauer - 06 Jul 2008 06:16 GMT > > > We are a meat eating mammal that nurtures our young. �The "universe" > > > designed us that way. �When we kill a deer to eat there is [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > The universe is god if god is omni(all those things). Large neural networks are intrinsically good.
Mitch Raemsch - 06 Jul 2008 21:20 GMT > > > We are a meat eating mammal that nurtures our young. �The "universe" > > > designed us that way. �When we kill a deer to eat there is [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > - Show quoted text - The universe was created by the spirit of God for a place for the spirit of man.
Sanforized - 06 Jul 2008 21:43 GMT > The universe was created by the spirit of God for a place for the > spirit of man. I've seen spam that's more interesting than your stuff.
Osmium - 06 Jul 2008 22:10 GMT > > The universe was created by the spirit of God for a place for the > > spirit of man. > > I've seen spam that's more interesting than your stuff. I agree. I was trying to provoke a discussion of ID and Mitch, the great scientist,answers with a litany from the Anglican mass, World without end, forever and ever, Amen.
Mitch Raemsch - 06 Jul 2008 22:54 GMT > > > The universe was created by the spirit of God for a place for the > > > spirit of man. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > great scientist,answers with a litany from the Anglican mass, World > without end, forever and ever, Amen. Only the aetheists believe in the death of man and his universe. Die with your universe then.
Sanforized - 06 Jul 2008 23:44 GMT >>>>The universe was created by the spirit of God for a place for the >>>>spirit of man. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >>I agree. I was trying to provoke a discussion of ID and Mitch, the >>great scientist, There are a number of scientists named Mitch, but this lunatic isn't one of them.
>>answers with a litany from the Anglican mass, World >>without end, forever and ever, Amen. I always wondered why Anglicans demanded a double infinity where Rome only required one. It seems to me a lapse in logic.
> Only the aetheists believe in the death of man and his universe. Die > with your universe then. So to counter your argument, I require that earlier lower lifeforms had a similar outlook. Future, more evolved lifeforms, once humanity has died out, will look back to see your arrogance and laugh.
Consider yourself chosen. If there be a God then it chose you as it's jester. There is no other way to explain your existance. You're doing an admirable job.
Mitch Raemsch - 07 Jul 2008 04:33 GMT > >>>>The universe was created by the spirit of God for a place for the > >>>>spirit of man. [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > explain your existance. You're doing an admirable > job. The universe was designed to last forever. If you think the universe is going to die then you would be wrong. Our Sun will be renewed. That is my arrogant belief that all worlds will live forever.
Mitch Raemsch
schoenfeld.one@gmail.com - 22 Jul 2008 14:02 GMT > > > The universe was created by the spirit of God for a place for the > > > spirit of man. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > great scientist,answers with a litany from the Anglican mass, World > without end, forever and ever, Amen. His answer may be closest to the truth. The universe you observe is a level of Hell. You observe it not because you are condemned to it but because it is the only one best suited for you.
You can eat an animal, because it tastes good, and you can feed it to your kid and enjoy it, but the undeniable truth is that you had to slaughter the other life to continue yours - and it didn't want to lose it.
You can really appreciate this point once you realize you are not at the top of the food chain, and never were.
In fact, the life that is above you prefers you falsley believe you are the top, because if you knew what it were like to be the deer, you would not eat the deer - and the whole system would fall apart ;-).
Damaeus - 07 Jul 2008 06:00 GMT In news:rec.org.mensa, BURT <macromitch@yahoo.com> posted on Sat, 5 Jul 2008 19:32:38 -0700 (PDT):
> The universe isn't God. Einstein said it himself: I want to know how > God created this universe. I want to know His thoughts. All the rest > are just details. God made a creator -- a tool he used. He named this tool Satan, like you'd name the robot that cleans your swimming pool. This tool was used like a whipping boy throughout creation. For example, in the Garden of Eden, it was actually the serpent and Satan who endured virtually all the punishment of everyone on the scene. Adam & Eve, being newly created beings, couldn't have handled the full "word" of punishment. So Adam & Eve each got a little lump in the throat, while Satan absorbed the other 99.9% of the wrath, not to mention all of his own. Just one of the full punishments would have immediately turned Adam & Eve into full-blown, permanent psychopaths.
That little "lump in the throat" is like a zip file of information that affected Adam & Eve as their brain processed what had just happened. It wasn't an effect that took hold of them all at once. It was something they noticed over time. Satan, on the other hand, being the whipping boy, took the brunt of all of it. Interesting, too, because he wasn't even given a choice as to whether he wanted to do it or not. God made him do it.
Damaeus
Eric Gisse - 06 Jul 2008 06:53 GMT > We are a meat eating mammal that nurtures our young. The "universe" > designed us that way. When we kill a deer to eat there is [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > supporters of intelligent design are right, the universe was designed > to include goodness and truth. The universe is then defective. Return to manufacturer.
The Ghost In The Machine - 06 Jul 2008 17:54 GMT In sci.physics, Osmium <Rushtown@aol.com> wrote on Sat, 5 Jul 2008 19:18:07 -0700 (PDT) <9443d96b-9427-4ed3-b8c8-144e0d434db1@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>:
> We are a meat eating mammal that nurtures our young. Oops. So much for kindness and good. Granted, carnivora are well ingrained into our fauna; a fair number of animals from house cats to T. Rex eat meat. We are also a compromise, if one can use the word (since we weren't explicitly designed), between a pure carnivore and a herbivore, since the latter have much longer digestive tracts (the cow in particular has 4 stomachs; we make do with but 1).
> The "universe" designed us that way. The "universe" didn't really do any explicit designing.
> When we kill a deer to eat there is > "goodness"---we can feed our families and it tastes good. At the same > time there is evil (from the deer's point of view.). So good and evil depend on viewpoint?
> When we have a child, or even when we encounter our neighbor's > children, we treat them with kindness. Jeffrey Dahlmer, Charles Manson, the Boston Strangler, David Berkowitz (aka Son of Sam), John Wayne Gacy (aka Pogo the Clown), Charles Manson, Ted Bundy, Richard Ramirez, Theodore Kaczynski (aka the Unabomber), the Zodiac Killer, and Jack the Ripper.
Lest the fair sex feel left out, I will also mention Mary Ann Cotton, Marybeth Tinning, Nannie Doss, Belle Gunness, Dorothea Puente, Alleen Wuornos, and Lizzie Borden.
"Kindness" is not the first word coming to mind here. :-) And that's before I've even begun to research gangsters (1930's/Al Capone era), gangstas (a modern variant), or looked into actual court cases attempting to find the hundreds if not thousands of individuals convicted of (and in some cases executed for) capital murder.
The bizarre thing is that these names are trivial to look up; a lot of people out there like these sorts of lists...myself included, I guess. After a fashion, we might even envy them; they left their mark on our collective psyche, and a horrid black mark it is, too, but it is highly visible. Will most of us be as well remembered? Would we want to be?
Admittedly, I digress.
> This helps propogate our > genes, promotes social cohesion--and feels good too. No doubt a serial murderer out stalking whores (a rather common -- and depressing -- theme) would say much the same.
The women would of course have a very different opinion...
> Whether god, or natural selection, programmed this into us--it shows > this is not an absurd and meaningless universe. In some small way the > supporters of intelligent design are right, the universe was designed > to include goodness and truth. The Universe is. Attempts to "decode" it range from the scientific to the absurd. Many times, we succeed; many times, the failures are interesting (the most notable one of relevance here might be Michelson-Morley, whose failure to detect any sort of aether drift eventually led to various proposals, all of which have since dropped by the wayside except Einstein's Theory of Relativity).
And occasionally, tragedy strikes. The one coming to mind is from mathematics, where Evariste Galois was killed in a duel. One might make a case here regarding Einstein, though, as it was his work that eventually lead to the atomic bomb, which killed hundreds of thousands of people in Japan. (It was war, though, and it may have saved millions of American lives, since no invasion of Japan was necessary. But J. Robert Oppenheimer, the actual scientific director of the Manhattan Project, was left deeply troubled, and salved his conscience by lobbying for what is now the IAEA.)
 Signature #191, ewill3@earthlink.net Windows Vista. Now in nine exciting editions. Try them all! ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Osmium - 10 Jul 2008 00:32 GMT On Jul 6, 9:54�am, The Ghost In The Machine <ew...@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote:
> In sci.physics, Osmium > <Rusht...@aol.com> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > > We are a meat eating mammal that nurtures our young.
> When we have a child, or even when we encounter our neighbor's > children, we treat them with kindness. Jeffrey Dahlmer
OK, Kindness and little ketchup sometimes.
Sid - 10 Jul 2008 00:35 GMT > On Jul 6, 9:54�am, The Ghost In The Machine > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > OK, Kindness and little ketchup sometimes. The universe is a figment of my imagination and I can prove it.
nuny@bid.nes - 19 Jul 2008 06:03 GMT > > On Jul 6, 9:54�am, The Ghost In The Machine > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > The universe is a figment of my imagination and I can prove it. To your own satisfaction, I trust?
Mark L. Fergerson
foolsrushin. - 21 Jul 2008 19:26 GMT On 19 Jul, 06:03, "n...@bid.nes" <Alien8...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Jul 6, 9:54�am, The Ghost In The Machine > > > <ew...@sirius.tg00suus7038.net> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > To your own satisfaction, I trust? > Mark L. Fergerson STICKS AND CARROTS ... .
Assuming 'design' applicable, one half of the world has been made by the (D)evil(s), the other half by Go(o)d(s).
'It's a Barnum and Bailey world, just as phony as it can be, but it wouldn't be make-believe - if you believed in me!'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcXBFstG5b8&watch_response
Hell's bells, that was a band you could dance to - and elegantly! And, maybe, end a sentence with a proposition! -- 'foolsrushin.'
Damaeus - 07 Jul 2008 05:48 GMT In news:rec.org.mensa, Osmium <Rushtown@aol.com> posted on Sat, 5 Jul 2008 19:18:07 -0700 (PDT):
> We are a meat eating mammal that nurtures our young. The "universe" > designed us that way. When we kill a deer to eat there is > "goodness"---we can feed our families and it tastes good. At the same > time there is evil (from the deer's point of view.). Actually, people can be reborn as animals if they need a short time to wait for another to die and they can be reborn together. But animals exist from within the kingdom. They're constant purveyors of truth, which is why people are so fascinated by them. But also, since animals exist from within the kingdom, they're under the "soul protection" of God, meaning that when they die, it's actually fun for them. If you could understand what the kingdom is like, it's a huge playground where people run and play and kill each other for the fun of it...because it doesn't hurt. People ask the question about what the meaning of life is and why we're all here. It's to hurt each other until it doesn't hurt anymore. If a black man can't hear the word "nigger" without going to pieces and calling everyone a racist, he's not ready to see the kingdom. Simple as that. And this fact adds up with my description of the kingdom. If he can't handle hearing "nigger" without complaining, he certainly can't handle being decapitated in the kingdom, which is actually fun. You get to see the whole world spinning by as your head rolls down the hill. Of course, you can't do that with these mortal bodies but one time. In the kingdom, you just reassemble yourself and have another go at it until you wet your pants with glee.
> When we have a child, or even when we encounter our neighbor's > children, we treat them with kindness. This helps propogate our > genes, promotes social cohesion--and feels good too.
> Whether god, or natural selection, programmed this into us--it shows > this is not an absurd and meaningless universe. In some small way the > supporters of intelligent design are right, the universe was designed > to include goodness and truth. Well, the connection between evolution and God is simple. There is an intelligence guiding the whole process -- an immortal DNA containing information about divine order. Species which mutate toward divine order survive. Species which mutate away from divine order go extinct.
This also proves my point above about the relationship between animals and people. People are beginning to learn to communicate with animals and understand their body language. This is because, like the awe-inspiring stories of Tarzan being raised by wolves, we were, indeed, raised by animals, ourselves. We learned the ways of animals by using our bodies, and learned the ways of God by using our minds.
How? Ever noticed that sometimes a duck or some bird seems to be laughing at you? What were you thinking about when you heard it? Examine objectively what you were thinking about and look for other options. Those kinds of incidences are clues to finding your true self -- what you were created to be, as opposed to what biological chance has laid on you.
As has been said in the Bible, men and lions will lie down together. In the beginning, enmity was placed between man and animals. That enmity is being worked out, though it's obviously going to take some time.
I think there might be a great deal of guilt to work out between man and animals. Men feel guilty about caging animals in zoos, and men don't understand that animals live within the Kingdom, and they're not suffering in cages. In fact, Zoos are a good idea because this is a big world that not everyone can travel in full, so zoos give people the chance to see something they might not otherwise see. God wouldn't let them suffer in cages. It works in such a way that their perceptions are switched around so it looks like they're suffering, but they see it as the possible end of their life, which would be a happy time -- a time of rejoining with the one they wanted to be reborn with again.
So yeah, it's sad to see a dog die if you don't know both sides of the story. A dog is beaten to death by someone who doesn't understand, the dog fights back, telling the man he's about to go to a place he's not yet ready for because the dog is being beaten with ignorance, just like Jesus was crucified in ignorance. Dogs are like the modern Jesus, innocent animals dying deaths at the hands of ignorant people, meant to make the world suffer, and yet it serves a purpose on the other side that people can't see plainly.
Osmium - 07 Jul 2008 06:32 GMT > In news:rec.org.mensa, Osmium <Rusht...@aol.com> posted on Sat, 5 Jul > 2008 19:18:07 -0700 (PDT): [quoted text clipped - 78 lines] > meant to make the world suffer, and yet it serves a purpose on the > other side that people can't see plainly. Yes, I have at times noticed ducks laughing at me, just as you have. I believe a duck I saw last week at McArthur Park is the reincarnation of my dad's old business partner, who defrauded our family. And that duck recognized me and was laughing that he had kept my family so poor that I had to drive a Toyota and not a Mercedes.
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 07 Jul 2008 19:12 GMT H-Bomb needed to keep people in line Bert
Remus - 18 Jul 2008 22:51 GMT > In news:rec.org.mensa, Osmium <Rusht...@aol.com> posted on Sat, 5 Jul > 2008 19:18:07 -0700 (PDT): [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > meant to make the world suffer, and yet it serves a purpose on the > other side that people can't see plainly. The word 'dog' is 'god' spelled backwards. Dogs tend to live a somewhat shorter lifespan than a human, they have a much shorter period of time before they reproduce, and they create a bloody mess when someone strikes them with an automobile and they do not have enough time to wonder to the side of the road before going unconscious. Their level of intelligence is somewhat less than that of an average human.
Future genetically engineered life forms which could live thousands of years, could transfer their minds into computers and then transfer themselves back into biological form, which eventually might develop the power of time travel, might be able to copy the neural engrams of the dog at the point within space-time when it dies. If they could plant electrodes in the dead dog's muscles, they might be able to get it to walk around for a short while before rigor mortis sets in. Getting the dead dog to seem to levitate by some application of force might or might not be more difficult.
That is, if these future life forms actually exist. The levitating dog may entirely be the product of the mind of a drunk human.
tadchem - 21 Jul 2008 21:39 GMT > We are a meat eating mammal that nurtures our young. The "universe" > designed us that way. When we kill a deer to eat there is [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > supporters of intelligent design are right, the universe was designed > to include goodness and truth. "Design" implies a "designer".
There is no empirical evidence to support the existence of a designer, as opposed to the existence of simple *mindless* cause-and-effect relationships of the physical universe.
=====
"Goodness" exists only in juxtaposition to "evil," either of which rests upon the concept of "harm" to a living being.
The fundamental nature of life is that it is mortal, and any condition or event which moves a living being to or towards its individual mortality (end-of-life) may be said to be "harmful."
"Goodness" and "evil" are related to "harm" in that an after-the-fact value judgment must be made by a living being concerning whether harm to a specific living being (itself or another) is "good" or "evil" in the view of the individual MAKING the judgment.
Thus "good" and "evil" are relative concepts.
The universe is amoral.
Tom Davidson Richmond, VA
foolsrushin. - 21 Jul 2008 23:44 GMT [snip.]
> "Goodness" and "evil" are related to "harm" in that an after-the-fact > value judgment must be made by a living being concerning whether harm > to a specific living being (itself or another) is "good" or "evil" in > the view of the individual MAKING the judgment. > Thus "good" and "evil" are relative concepts. [Are you an isurance salesman? - Ed.]
> The universe is amoral. ['The, universe, is, amoral' are all questionable!- Ed.] > Tom Davidson > Richmond, VA A neo-Kantian ( I apologise!) might challenge this in a somewhat a priori way, asking, for example, whether the pursuit of knowledge is worth while: should you give your pennies to this or that cause, a college, a cure for a diseease, and so forth, none of which is specifically driven in any way at all, morally or physically!
What is intersesting about such projects is that they are not just accidental occurrences of bits of matter sparking off one another. If that were true. there would only be noise, and no system at all, no progress! [Shockley and Bardeen: forget it! - Ed.]
From self-satisfactory solopism to people as simply some sort of accidental output of a chemical box of tricks, what is never stated is the AIM.
So, what is your aim, Tom? -- 'foolsrushin.'
foolsrushin - 21 Jul 2008 23:52 GMT > [snip.] > [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > -- > 'foolsrushin.' foolsrushin. - 22 Jul 2008 00:56 GMT [snip.]
> > So, what is your aim, Tom? > > -- > > 'foolsrushin.' I apologise. I hit the wrong key, though maybe the right note. In his 'Essay on Power', Russell said, more or less, 'that whilst membership of a State may be in accordance with the will of an individual, it is not clear that it is due to his will.'
Thus, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPQE3GfkrOo&NR=1 -- .'foolsrushin'..
foolsrushin - 22 Jul 2008 01:28 GMT > [snip.] > > > So, what is your aim, Tom? > > > -- > > > 'foolsrushin.'
> I apologise. I hit the wrong key, though maybe the right note. In his > 'Essay on Power', Russell said, more or less, 'that whilst membership [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > -- > .'foolsrushin'.. Tom, discuss! ID means ... ? Give all the meanings of 'Who?' A short list will do? -- 'foolsrushin.'
foolsrushin. - 24 Jul 2008 07:41 GMT > > [snip.] > > > > So, what is your aim, Tom? [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > -- > 'foolsrushin.' **************************************************************************** So, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FQ3ZSmRPpY&NR=1
'In your Easter bonnet, with all the flowers upon it ... .' -- 'foolsrushin.'
The Natural Philosopher - 22 Jul 2008 03:58 GMT > [snip.] > [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > accidental output of a chemical box of tricks, what is never stated is > the AIM. People have aims. The universe may or may not.
> So, what is your aim, Tom? > -- > 'foolsrushin.' foolsrushin. - 22 Jul 2008 04:33 GMT {snips.]
> > From self-satisfactory solopism to people as simply some sort of > > accidental output of a chemical box of tricks, what is never stated is > > the AIM.
> People have aims. The universe may or may not. [ It needs to have enough stability and direction to allow for this conversation - but also, S&T, for a lot more, whereby we can, even, if only potentially, store ourselves somewhere: we may well be just a book taken out of a library, to put things the other way round! ]
> > So, what is your aim, Tom? > > -- > > 'foolsrushin.' Excellent point, so, Tom, what are your aims? -- 'foolsrushin.'
schoenfeld.one@gmail.com - 22 Jul 2008 13:42 GMT > We are a meat eating mammal that nurtures our young. The "universe" > designed us that way. When we kill a deer to eat there is [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > supporters of intelligent design are right, the universe was designed > to include goodness and truth. You say killing a deer is evil, but feeding it to your child is good?
But you do so to protect and grow your child so that it may kill more deer - perhaps the children deers of your victim?
If you take good and evil as fundamental axioms to base your perception of reality, the only logical conclusion is that this reality _IS_ the infinite levels of Hell superimposed over each other.
With each life-system/being/observer offering a unique perspective of it all.
Life can only maintain it's structure, it's geometry, it's divinity through the slaughter of another.
Kaballah crazies and satanic people have known this for a very long time.
From a physics point of view it comes down to the 2nd law of thermodynamics - no closed system can increase in order/structure/ geometry with time.
The truth then is that this REALLY IS Hell. It always was.
The question is, Demon, what are YOU going to do about it?
|
|
|