From Osher Doctorow
When we examine the (Probable) Causal scenarios discussed in the last
few subsections, recall the rules:
1) odd integers above 1 Cause the next higher even integer (for
example, 9 Causes 10).
2) primes (always odd except for 2) Cause the next higher prime (for
example, 3 Causes 5)
So Superstring Theory with dimension 10 cannot Cause M-Theory with
dimension 11, even though Superstring Theory is regarded as arising by
eliminating specific parts of 11-dimensional theory. They must
physically differ, probably as different phases.
On the other hand, 9 Causes both 10 and 11 by the above Rules, and
this is what research indicates if we examine it carefully. Look at
the papers:
3) "On M-9-branes and their dimensional reduction," arXiv: hep-th/
0102084 v1 15 Feb 2001, 6 pages (2 columns per page)
4) "Spacetime-filling branes and strings with sixteen supercharges,"
by E. Bergshoeff et al of U. Groningen Netherlands and C. M. Hull of
Queen Mary & Westfield College London U.K. and Y. Lozano of U. Utrecht
Netherlands, hep-th/9812224, also published in Nucl Phys B 564 (2000)
29.
It turns out from (3) and/or (4) that p-branes with p > = 8 are very
important because M- and string theories with 16 supercharges appear
to be constructible by these branes, and also there are D9-branes as
well as 9-branes in NS-NS sectors of both IIA and IIB strings, the low-
energy effective action for a D9 brane being a Born-Infeld type action
for 10dimensional super-YM theory.
Where does 16 come from? The 5 Superstring theories include 3 with
SO(32) as symmetry group, or SO(32)/Z2, namely the 2 Heterotic string
theories and the type I string theory, and a 10-dimensional SUSY
theory has a 32-component Majorana spinor which can be decomposed into
pairs of 16-component chiral Majorana-Weyl spinors whose invariants
according ot the same or opposite chiralities separate the Superstring
theories (see "String Theory," Wikipedia for example, as well as
"Superstring Theory," Wikipedia).
Osher Doctorow
OsherD - 07 Jul 2008 04:04 GMT
From Osher Doctorow
Instead of "9 causes both 10 and 11," I meant to type "9 causes 10" in
the last post.
It could, however, be that odd integers Cause higher odd integers from
additional rules, but that will hopefully be examined later.
Osher Doctorow