 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / July 2008Cosmic Inflation and Dark Energy:
Current hot big-bang cosmology includes an unknown particle or field called an inflaton, producing a negative pressure vacuum, that brings about an exponential ( superluminal) expansion of the nascent universe. I propose that this inflation was in fact produced by the inchoate universe being originally constituted with photons, then undergoing a phase change to less energetic, more matter like substance. There's no need to explain with exotic conditions and forces when a simple solution using current models is available; a reassessment of parameters, not a total revision appealing to unknown aspects! That's more magic than science. P.C.Stelzner > Current hot big-bang cosmology includes an unknown particle or > field called an inflaton, producing a negative pressure vacuum, that [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > P.C.Stelzner Where do the leptons and quarks come from in your "theory"? Sam, I don't claim my ideas to be theory without a rigorous mathematical underpinning; I only give a proposal using previously accepted models that could lead to a unified theory. After the initial inflation period of photons, there would be a precipitation caused by expansive cooling, a phase change brought about by spontaneous symmetry breaking. This precipitate would fall into the two forms of fermion material, those that react to strong interactions and those that do not. This initial divide is the first sign of what I have characterize as the movement toward centers, verses the movement away from centers. These movements are analogous to a particle / wave duality.Those initial fermions that are more particle like become the quarks. The fermions that are more wave like would become the leptons. Each fermion would follow a cascade from unstable to stable with leptons moving from the tau lepton, through the muon, then to the electron. Each of these leptons would also occur with their weak doublets. For the fermions that experience the strong interactions, their cascade from unstable flavors: charm- strange, top- bottom would proceed to the stable up and down quarks; these two, down and up, would take respective positions as particle / wave duality, with the down quark being the more particle like, and the up quark the more wave like. A poor attempt to explain this duality using the Mandelbrot set is still available at my web page: http://community.webtv.net/paul707/TheDiadeinParadigm Thanks for showing interest Professor, P.C.Stelzner > Sam, > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > After the initial inflation period of photons Paul--Why do you think there were photons (boson) at the onset of inflation? Why are you linking photons and only photons with inflation? , there would be a > precipitation caused by expansive cooling, a phase change brought about > by spontaneous symmetry breaking. This precipitate would fall into the [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > P.C.Stelzner Sam, Great question, why light. I've been thinking about this since I was twelve and I'm 48 now. I'm not a formally educated man, not trained in concise methods for writing explanations, so I pray for your patients with my word salad! For me these considerations revolve around what mater is, and what energy is: Light is the most energetic substance, and the closest to what could be considered 'pure energy' ( pure energy is an impossibility I feel); and as for mater, black hole singularities are the closest to pure mater possible as I see it. I envision a duality that encompasses all material states and forces, a particle/wave duality that is expressed as point-like and field-like. Each fermion and boson would be a ratio of these two. Not only those material states and forces the universe is made of, but the universe in totality would also be a ratio of these two, swinging first toward one extreme, and then toward the other. So why light? The consideration of the most energy-like phase being light, is because I fail to envision anything else more energetic and less mass-like than light. I'm thinking lately of a possible mathematical modeling for these fluctuations, or swings between tendencies, I propose a tangent function. Where the opposite (sine), or numerator, would be the point-like derivative with the plank length as the diameter's upper limit; and the denominator, or adjacent (cosine), as the field-like derivative with the plank-length as a lower limit: As the total universe would turn increasingly towards point-like, or black holes, the numerator would approach zero. Obviously zero would not be reached, producing instead an asymptote that flips the tangent function. I envision this flip as the big-bang. The denomination would then become the new numerator, the universe would flip from almost total point-like, to almost total field-like. I can't conceive of any other substance except light energy as a possible medium for a field-like condition. This flip in the tangent function would also seem to imply that the new universe would be an anti-mater universe when compared to the previous universe, a mirror of the previous cycle. Thanks again professor for the questions. P.C.Stelzner Sam, I understand the unorthodoxy of these propositions, but the symmetry seems to be beauty itself, which gives me courage that there might be truth. P.C.Stelzner > Sam, > I understand the unorthodoxy of these propositions, but the > symmetry seems to be beauty itself, which gives me courage that there > might be truth. > > P.C.Stelzner Paul, see what you make of this, OK? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether's_theorem Noether's theorem (also known as Noether's first theorem) states that any differentiable symmetry of the action of a physical system has a corresponding conservation law. The action of a physical system is an integral of a so-called Lagrangian function, from which the system's behavior can be determined by the principle of least action. This seminal theorem was proven by Emmy Noether in 1915 and published in 1918.[1] Please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether's_theorem OMG Sam, The love of my life and I missed her by almost a century! Emmy, I love her! What a beautiful mind, I've always fantasized about meeting someone like her, but alas, time is the foil. From what I can understand of the explanation I have reason to be of cheer, the system I envision is conserved, nothing is taken, nothing is added between oscillations. Symmetry is maintained and total momentum is conserved. The principle of entropy is satisfied by the movement from energy (order) to mass (diss-order) by being a one-way arrow of potential. P.C.Stelzner > OMG Sam, > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > movement from energy (order) to mass (diss-order) by being a one-way > arrow of potential. Why don't you start teaching yourself the mathematics of physics? Agent Smith, am I missing something? paul707@webtv.net (Paul Stelzner) wrote in news:23412-48776A05-14 @storefull-3271.bay.webtv.net: > Agent Smith, am I missing something? Aren't you doing all your theorizing without looking at equations? Sam My theory of matter and anti-matter not touching is "time lapse" Imperial theory blames nature for a bad balancing act Bert > Sam My theory of matter and anti-matter not touching is "time lapse" > Imperial theory blames nature for a bad balancing act Bert There are no observed aggregates of antimatter, Herb! Quit babbling! Sam Reality is there is lots of missing mass. In the tiny submicroscopic realm we have "Whimps" and "MACHOS" In the macro realm we have BH and I'll throw in Neutron stars and black and brown dwarfs Best you argue with Vera Rubin. She calls this "missing matter" Sam also this thought jumped in How about space dust Planets with no stars Well Sam The universe is 65% dark energy 30% dark matter,and that only leaves just about us and a few percent of the matter we can see Go figure Bert > Sam Reality is there is lots of missing mass. In the tiny submicroscopic > realm we have "Whimps" and "MACHOS" In the macro realm we have BH and [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > universe is 65% dark energy 30% dark matter,and that only leaves just > about us and a few percent of the matter we can see Go figure Bert Using you figures, Herb, for the mass-energy budget of the universe: Dark Energy: .65 Dark Matter: .30 Atoms: .04 ====== .99 Leaves a bit of wiggle room. And it is WRONG according to the WMAP DATA Dark Energy: .74 Dark Matter: .22 Atoms: .04 ====== 1.00 > Current hot big-bang cosmology includes an unknown particle or > field called an inflaton, producing a negative pressure vacuum, that > brings about an exponential ( superluminal) expansion of the nascent > universe. I propose that this inflation was in fact produced by the > inchoate universe being originally constituted with photons, then > undergoing a phase change to less energetic, more matter like substance. 1) Conservation of baryon number, isospin, hypercharge, quark color. 2) Empirical preponderence of matter over antimatter. 3) Bullshit > There's no need to explain with exotic conditions and forces when a > simple solution using current models is available; a reassessment of > parameters, not a total revision appealing to unknown aspects! That's > more magic than science. (1) plus (2) then (3).  SignatureUncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 > Current hot big-bang cosmology includes an unknown particle or > field called an inflaton, producing a negative pressure vacuum, that [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > P.C.Stelzner No, magic is what it would take to turn photons into baryons. > Current hot big-bang cosmology includes an unknown particle or > field called an inflaton, producing a negative pressure vacuum, that [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > P.C.Stelzner The expansion of hypersphere requires no energy. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.