Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / July 2008

"The Einstein Hoax"

    The Einstein Hoax was written to counter an intellectual "fast shuffle"
which used Dr. Einstein's Special Relativity (which is easily seen to be a
mathematical copy of the earlier Lorentz Transformations Aether Theory) to
propagate the idea that our physical reality was too subtle to be understood
by mortal men and could only be dealt with using sophisticated mathematics.
This ploy served the academic community very well. The quote was made that
Dr. Einstein's principle contribution was not Special Relativity but rather
the showing that mathematics could used to make advances in the physical
sciences and "it was no longer necessary to wait for "the few great minds
that arise in each century" to make progress. Since the availability of such
intelligent men could not be expanded but mathematics can be taught to
anyone, the approach not only made the physical sciences more mysterious,
but allowed an unlimited expansion of the contributing scientific community.

    The phenomena associated with both Special and General Relativity seem,
to a large degree, to be incomprehensible and the conclusions contradictory.
There is a simple reason for this. The explanations which are provided lead
the mind to recognize inherent contradictions which are not apparent in the
mathematics. Since the contradictions do not appear in the mathematics it
was considered obvious that did not exist! These contradictions have led to
the continuous confusion appearing in the Newsgroups and elsewhere. The
reality is that, when an expert(s) cannot explain his(their) knowledge to an
intelligent layman (laymen), there can only be one explanation. The
expert(s) do not actually understand their subject matter. IT IS NOT BECAUSE
OF THE LIMITATIONJS OF THE LAYMEN.

    "The Einstein Hoax", http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm, was written to
provide an understanding of our physical reality which is in agreement with
all known physical observations and mathematical logic and , most
importantly, pass the "intelligent layman" test. The chapters of "The
Einstein Hoax" are listed below:

Chapter Titles

    1. - Introduction
    2. - Historical Background
    3. - The Nature of the Einstein Hoax
    4. - Does the Aether Exist?
    5. - The Resurrection of Absolute Velocity by Quantum Experiments
    6. - The Nature of Reality
    7. - Applying the Lorentz Transformations Properly
    8. - Generating the Gravity Transformations
    9. - Dr. Einstein's Error and the Introduction of Curved Space
    10. - Gravitational Contraction and Collapse
    11. - Gravitational Collapse and the Creation of a Universe
    12. - The Space Time Continuum
    13. - The Nature of Particles
    14. - Adding Quantum Effects to Our Understanding
    15. - Changing the Paradigms
    16. - What Can We Conclude?

    There are 57,000 words and 53 illustrations.

    The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997); http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm 
(1987); and http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE
ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS
TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE
MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.

    All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at the
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.

    Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

    E-mail:- einsteinhoax@isp.com. If you wish a reply, be sure that your
mail reception is not blocked.

    The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.