> Electron microscope sees single hydrogen atoms
> http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/35034
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> See:http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/35034
Sam, I am a little hesitant to accept this, because the energy
required to shorten the wavelength of an electron to the level where
it could be possile to image a hydrogen atom is far greater than the
energy level required to disrupt the hydrogen atom.
I'm also a bit hesitant to accept any information as fact that is
posted on a commercial website on which you have to sign in to read.
Harry C.
Sam Wormley - 18 Jul 2008 00:03 GMT
>> Electron microscope sees single hydrogen atoms
>> http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/35034
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Harry C.
As you should be, Harry. I wish all of the "science" article were
accompanied by reference to pre-prints or journal articles... But
few are... for what it's worth.. I do try to filter somewhat. A poor
filter, but still an attempt.
-Sam
hhc314@yahoo.com - 18 Jul 2008 01:14 GMT
> hhc...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >> Electron microscope sees single hydrogen atoms
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Sam, I hope my comments were not taken as any disrespect to you.
You're about the only poster that still posts here regularly in an
effort to elevate the level of discussions on this newsgroup. Here I
simply posted certain facts that I certainly believe does not come as
news to you.
I tend to believe that both of us are here trying to elevate the level
of ongoing discussion, both in our own ways.
Harry C.
Sam Wormley - 18 Jul 2008 01:29 GMT
>> hhc...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>> Electron microscope sees single hydrogen atoms
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> Harry C.
Yes--we consciously do (and at least a half dozen others) attempt to
raise the discussion level. I sincerely thank you, Harry, and the
others who really do contribute! I came here some years ago expecting
to learn... as opposed to "teach". :-(
Jim Black - 18 Jul 2008 01:51 GMT
>> Electron microscope sees single hydrogen atoms
>> http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/35034
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Harry C.
They had a link to the original Nature article
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v454/n7202/abs/nature07094.html
which said:
-> We emphasize that we do not claim to have resolved a hydrogen–carbon
-> distance, which would require advanced aberration-corrected
-> instrumentation. However, detecting an isolated hydrogen atom against a
-> nearly invisible background only requires an adequate signal-to-noise
-> ratio.

Signature
Jim E. Black (domain in headers)
How to filter out stupid arguments in 40tude Dialog:
!markread,ignore From "Name" +"<email address>"
[X] Watch/Ignore works on subthreads
> Electron microscope sees single hydrogen atoms
> http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/35034
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> See:http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/35034
To be isolated in such a structure, a hydrogen atom needs to
be rigidly covalently bound to one of the molecules of the structure
or else it would not say put as the scattering occurs.
So all that remains to possibly be detected is the hydrogen nucleus
(a proton) hanging out.
This means that if "something" was really detected in the process
pertaining to a hydrogen atom, it had to be the hydrogen nucleus.
André Michaud