> > On Jul 18, 4:14 am, jonas.thornv...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> I am interested but know very little about magnetic fields, magnetic
> radiation and magnetic flux.
Terrestrial surface field is below 0.4 gauss and dropping.
Refrigerator magnets are about 100 gauss. MRI tunnels are abut 10,000
gauss. Pulsars are around a billion gauss. The vacuum is estimated to
break down around 1-10 trillion gauss.
Electrons spiral around magnetic lines of force. Strong magnetic
fields therefore elongate atoms. You don't want to be in fields
beyond around 50 teslas lest your biochemistry go for a Burton.

Signature
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
jonas.thornvall@hotmail.com - 18 Jul 2008 17:21 GMT
> jonas.thornv...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
> fields therefore elongate atoms. You don't want to be in fields
> beyond around 50 teslas lest your biochemistry go for a Burton.
How strong is the suns magnetic field using gauss, what formula should
i use to calculate how it diminish with distance?
Later you are talking about teslas, how does this unit relate to the
measured gauss.
> --
> Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
> (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2- Dölj citerad text -
>
> - Visa citerad text -
Uncle Al - 18 Jul 2008 19:56 GMT
> > jonas.thornv...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> Later you are talking about teslas, how does this unit relate to the
> measured gauss.
Screw your lazy ignorant a.s into a chair and google it. Ignorance is
educable, stupidity is forever.

Signature
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
jonas.thornvall@hotmail.com - 18 Jul 2008 20:11 GMT
> jonas.thornv...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 65 lines]
>
> - Visa citerad text -
;) maybe i will i saw a formula on wikipedia to calculate so i
probably could.
Meanwhile i give you something to ponder over, not that i think you
know or can calculate the answer...
If we somehow could align strong repelling magnets in a straight
plast tube along a 300 000 km line in space.
We then push the first one how long time would it take before our
gaussmeter in the other end noticed a change in the flux?
Uncle Al - 18 Jul 2008 23:25 GMT
jonas.thornvall@hotmail.com wrote:
> > jonas.thornv...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > > > jonas.thornv...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > On Jul 18, 4:14 am, jonas.thornv...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Meanwhile i give you something to ponder over, not that i think you
> know or can calculate the answer...
You are edging into idiot territory
> If we somehow could align strong repelling magnets in a straight
> plast tube along a 300 000 km line in space.
>
> We then push the first one how long time would it take before our
> gaussmeter in the other end noticed a change in the flux?
Depends on the gaussmeter. distance/lightspeed - and you only need
one magnet. With all the intervening mass, never.

Signature
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
jonas.thornvall@hotmail.com - 19 Jul 2008 09:12 GMT
> jonas.thornv...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > >jonas.thornv...@hotmail.com wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Depends on the gaussmeter. distance/lightspeed - and you only need
> one magnet. With all the intervening mass, never.
Oh so now you say that a long enough bar magnet with accomany field,
will not react to another field approaching.
I am pretty sure that the field will response, what make you think
that a line of interchanging fields act any differently, you can glue
two repelling magnets and you have one field.
> --
> Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
> (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 18 Jul 2008 17:35 GMT
Uncle Al (of Irvine) Their fields are to far away,and obey the inverse
square law . Best to stay here in our solar system with Sun and Jupiter.
Like the Sun magnetic field strength is 2 gauss(645% of Earth ) Once
you go outside our so0lar system you go into using approximation Go
figure Bert
On Jul 18, 5:53 am, jonas.thornv...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > On Jul 18, 4:14 am, jonas.thornv...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> How strong is the magnetic flux field outside earth electro magnetic
> field is the flux itself harmful?
Field is not flux.
Flux is the integrated amount of field that passes through a given
surface area.
Magnetic flux can only do something useful when it changes.
> The other night i watched the start of Moobase Alpha and i found it
> utterly fascinating.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> strength from a pulsar "gauss?" outside earths shielding magnetic
> field.
Magnetic fields propagate through space the same way electric fields
do in that they are simply there. A dipole field falls off as 1/r^3,
which is far faster than gravity.
> Is the spaceshuttles and spacestations within earths electro magnetic
> field?
Earth's magnetic field - depending how you measure - extends for many
Earth radii in all directions. Some more than others, though.
> Besides the radiation, how do they shield the spacecrafts from fluxes
> in the electro magnetic surrounding "space?", or is it not necessary?
You can shield it but why? The ambient field is weak, and does not
change rapidly enough to harm anything. Except spacecraft during
events that rapidly compress the field, but that's complicated.
> What happen to a body if there is strong fluctuations in the magnetic
> fields would it cause sickness, at how many gauss will the body and
> cells get damaged?
Strong fluctuations will induce current. A strong static field will
'encourage' anything with unpaired electrons to align, and fields that
are strong enough will start to interact with the fantastically weak
diamagnetic properties of water.
At some point, I have no idea where, the field will disrupt the
biochemistry by totally borking out the ion channels in your body.
> I am interested but know very little about magnetic fields, magnetic
> radiation and magnetic flux.
Purchase a classical E&M textbook.
jonas.thornvall@hotmail.com - 18 Jul 2008 18:15 GMT
> On Jul 18, 5:53 am, jonas.thornv...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> surface area.
> Magnetic flux can only do something useful when it changes.
But a stationary barmagnet have both field and flux, where the flux is
the strength at a certain distance over a certain area?
But if i replace the cone on a speaker with a bar magnet and let it
oscillate in 1200 hz, is that an oscillating flux or a magnetic field
transmitter?
Does such phenomenon exist in nature magnetic fields that oscillate,
what about neutron stars?
What could i use to measure pickup the oscillating flux would it be
sufficient with an iron ring and copperthread linning?
Would that be a primitive gausmeter?
I would like to try to build an magnetic transmitter and receiver that
work over a couple of meters. "For audio to start with" could you give
me some advice or isn't it feasible?
> > The other night i watched the start of Moobase Alpha and i found it
> > utterly fascinating.
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
>
> - Visa citerad text -
jonas.thornvall@hotmail.com - 18 Jul 2008 18:26 GMT
On 18 Juli, 19:15, jonas.thornv...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > On Jul 18, 5:53 am, jonas.thornv...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 91 lines]
>
> - Visa citerad text -
If we somehow could align strongly repelling magnets in a straight
plast tube along a 300 000 km line in space.
We then push the first one how long time would it take before our
gaussmeter in the other end noticed a change in the flux?
Eric Gisse - 18 Jul 2008 19:46 GMT
On Jul 18, 9:15 am, jonas.thornv...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > On Jul 18, 5:53 am, jonas.thornv...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> But a stationary barmagnet have both field and flux, where the flux is
> the strength at a certain distance over a certain area?
Again - field is not flux.
[...]