From Osher Doctorow
Consider:
1) (x o y) = xy + F(x, y) - yFX(x), or for short xy + F - FX
We can factor this as:
2) (x o y) = y(x - FX(x)) + F(x, y)
For X, Y nonnegative continuous random variables, we know that x > = 0
and y > = 0, and it is known from mathematical probability-statistics
that FX(x) > = and F(x, y) > = 0 always.
When x = FX(x), which only happens for all x for the uniform
probability distribution function (pdf) on [0, 1], we have:
3) (x o y) = 0 + F(x, y) = F(x, y) when x= FX(x) for all x in [0, 1]
(so X uniform on [0, 1])
I will prove here that for the Exponential cumulative distribution
function FX(x):
4) FX(x) = 1 - exp(-x)
we have:
5) (x o y) > = xy for X an exponentially distributed random variable,
with = only at x = 0.
Simply use the second derivative test on:
6) exp(-x) + x - 1
We have:
7) Dx[exp(-x) + x - 1] = -exp(-x) + 1 = 0 iff 1 = 1/exp(x) iff exp(x)
= 1 iff x = 0
8) Dxx[exp(-x) + x - 1] = Dx[-exp(-x) + 1] = exp(-x) > 0 always
So by the second derivative test, we have:
9) exp(-x) + x - 1 has a relative minimum at x = 0, at which point
exp(-x) + x - 1 = 0, and therefore exp(-x) + x - 1 > 0 if x is not 0,
which is to say FX(x) = 1 - exp(-x) < x if x is not 0.
Q.E.D.
The integral mean value theorem proves that FX(x) < = x for X a
continuous nonnegative random variable provided that the probability
density function of X, fX(x), does not exceed 1. Although this does
not always hold, for example for a very sharply peaked Gaussian/normal
distribution close to its mean (with very small variance), it holds
for a very large variety of families of random variables.
Osher Doctorow
OsherD - 19 Jul 2008 08:14 GMT
From Osher Doctorow
I meant to write in equation (1): "for short, xy + F - yFX," not "xy +
F - FX".
Osher Doctorow