> > [snip drivel]
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Idiot, I am writing here because there are thousands of people around
> the world are tracing my postings.
What makes you feel like "thousand of people" are watching everything
you say? I've only seen like 5 people ever respond to you, and you
have no members in your newsgroups other than yourself.
> Not an idiot like you selected to write here on every article posted
> by anyone.
I don't write on every article posted by anyone. Perhaps you are
confused?
> It takes some time; I have to pass through those who are in illegal
> control of the newsgroups (your boss hidden behind the scene).
Who is in control, why am I not being paid, and why is it _illegal_
control?
If "they" were in control - why do they allow you to speak? If I knew
who my boss was, I'd ask him to block you if only because your
delusions are becoming insufferable. If they can't shut you up, how
are they in control? If they won't shut you up, why are you bitching?
> By the way you (and others like you) are welcome to join my
> newsgroups, if you behave nicely you have no problems (nothing
> personal, my views of about you (and persons like you )will not
> affect membership).
Why would I want to join your newsgroups? I'm not interested in watch
you talk to yourself week after week.
> But if you use foul language and or again transfer interests of a few
> in my newsgroups, I will immediately terminate your membership under
> provisions of Form A No.11-14 and No.17).
Did you have to take classes or read a book to get to be such a
control freak, or did that come naturally? Think it was your mother's
or father's influence?
By the way - you have no power here. Not just because you don't own
this newsgroup, but because my personality is stronger than yours and
I won't be your doormat.
> There is a Persian proverb it says like this:
>
> “ Happy a person who has come to this world as a “baby donkey” and
> died as a donkey”
I'm going to need a translation from "crazy sh.t" to "normal English".
> Dr.M.Basti
Mehran Basti - 20 Jul 2008 19:10 GMT
> I won't be your doormat.
Looks like you think so small.
No one will be a doorman or doormat.
Basti Newsgroups will develop globally with thousands of members in
each of its fields with many franchises.
This is because I believe there is a need for dynamic newsgroups.
People just cannot write in current public newsgroups and express
their expertise, simply because they do see the right environment for
them.
If this is your radius of imagination of the future, you need to think
harder.
It may take many months such that we start to compete with public
newsgroups.
Looks like you are a paranoid kid, you have nothing to present
yourself but to write nonsense answers to the posters.
Hardly a few out 1000 members may be disqualified; I believe they will
respect the codes of Form A.
Dr.M.Basti
Eric Gisse - 20 Jul 2008 20:22 GMT
> > I won't be your doormat.
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Dr.M.Basti
So how many members do you have?
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 20 Jul 2008 21:55 GMT
> > > I won't be your doormat.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> >
> > Dr.M.Basti
> So how many members do you have?
The same number as the number of personalities he has.

Signature
Jim Pennino
Remove .spam.sux to reply.
Richard Tobin - 20 Jul 2008 23:02 GMT
>Basti Newsgroups will develop globally with thousands of members in
>each of its fields with many franchises.
When?
-- Richard

Signature
Please remember to mention me / in tapes you leave behind.
Jeff▲Relf - 20 Jul 2008 23:29 GMT
Dr. M. Basti told you:
“ Idiot, I am writing here because there are
thousands of people around the world are tracing my postings. ”.
Many have delusions like Dr. M. Basti, including David A. Smith.
Dr. M. Basti imagines he has about 10 thousand Faithful readers,
but each one is so bored out of his gourd that he Never Ever feels
the need to hit the reply button .. could that a good thing ?
Wouldn't it be better to have just one reader,
one that's so moved that he actually makes favorable comments ?
Unless you're replying to someone who hasn't plonked you,
you shouldn't expect that Anyone is reading Any of your posts,
much les Thousands reading all of your posts, all the time.
However, by mentioning people's names,
your can be sure that lots of people will read your post. So ..
Below is the XRank of people in Sci.Physics ( like Goole's PageRank ).
On the web, Google.COM has the highest PageRank
( 10, on a scale from 0 to 10 ) because, when randomly following links,
you'll encounter Google.COM more often than any other site.
So you could say: “ Google.COM has the highest exposure ”.
For Google, that translates into giga dollars per year in sales ! !
Like PageRank, my newsreader ( X.EXE ) treats each “ Nym ” ( author )
as if he were a web page, with up to 33 links on it.
( Each reply is like a link, limited to the 33 most recent replies ).
XRank uses a 0 to 1 scale ( like “ PageRank / 10 ” ),
where an XRank of “ 1 ” is given to the Nym with the most “ exposure ”,
similar to how as Google is gets a “ 10 ” on the web.
For more details, see my website: “ JeffRelf.F-M.FM ”.
The full list is at: “ JeffRelf.F-M.FM/_Phy_R.TXT ”.
Screenshot: “ JeffRelf.F-M.FM/_Phy_R_TXT.PNG ”.
In the last 15.7 Days Sci.Physics had 128 Nyms making 7 or more posts,
including 45 who make 33 or more posts. X.EXE's XRanking is currently:
rbwinn 1 Tom_Potter .914 Sam_Buckland .903 Antares_531 .876
BradGuth .865 gb .823 tadchem .809 Danny_Milano .785
DanielSan .761 Ian_Parker .743 Pentcho_Valev .733
Sam_Wormley .725 hanson .722 Y_Porat .701 DB .692
Greg_Neill .67 Eric_Gisse .661 Spaceman .653 MitchNobel .638
jonas_thornvall .625 Steve_O .624 Linda_Fox .605
Tom_Roberts .597 Alex_W .597 PD .584 Androcles .577
Mehran_Basti .569 NoEinstein .555 Mike_Jr .553 The_Loan .551
The_Natural .548 jimp_specsol .542 Benj .541 Uncle_Ben .535
Ben_Dolan .531 Dr_Henri .521 kenseto .517 srp2inc_gmail .513
The_Ghost_In .511 Free_Lunch .511 Stan_O .51
hhc314_yahoo .509 Uncle_Al .507 Dogmantic .502
BuddyThunder .493 Paul_Stelzner .49 Smiler .487 Shubee .482
Jerry_Kraus .472 caspar .472 John_Schutkeker .466
Cwatters .464 Art_Deco .46 Osmium .459 jmfbahciv .457
hhyapster_gmail .456 ah .453 Agent_Smith .452
Andrew_Usher .445 Sue .444 Eeyore .437 Treb .434
kronecker_yahoo .432 Jim_Black .431 Robert_Clark .43
blues517 .423 V_for_Vendicar .423 john .42 pbamvv .417
Pmb .416 Buck_Mulligan .412 Jeff▲Relf .411 Huang .408
Rand_Simberg .401 Fred_J_McCall .4 zasochimti .4 Thomas .398
Sanforized .396 foolsrushin .394 Jon_Green .394 Enkidu .39
John_Kennaugh .389 David_A_Smith .388 hwabnig .383
Brian_E_Clark .382 paparios_gmail .381 Don_Lancaster .381
Romano_Amodeo .373 Geopelia .371 Igor .369
Yanick_Toutain .367 plutonium .364 Jerry_Avins .361 broli .36
Christopher_A .358 Dlo .358 kT .355 W_eWatson .353
Mark_K_Bilbo .35 Odysseus .348 Koobee_Wublee .342
Dirk_Van_de .342 Juan_R .338 Seon_Ferguson .329 harry .323
Lin_Liangtai .322 Craig_Markwardt .322 John_Baker .32
nuny_bid_nes .316 sir_jpturcaud .312 sir_jean_paul .309
spudnik .308 DuhIdiot .307 John_C_Polasek .307 dedanoe .305
zzbunker .3 mst3k .294 Bob_Cain .294 OsherD .288
rajaniyer .287 lithium_nbnet .286 Johnnie_In_The .286
G_L_Bradford .286 James_Burns .281 honestjohn .276
Puppet_Sock .276 Autymn_D_C .276 xxein1_gmail .276
Mehran Basti - 21 Jul 2008 00:08 GMT
> Dr. M. Basti told you:
> “ Idiot, I am writing here because there are
> thousands of people around the world are tracing my postings. ”.
I sometimes receive email from some people around the world.
I cannot assume only that person from certain country is looking at my
postings.
Possibly about a thousand each, so the estimate is not far away.
Why they are not yet ready to be a member?, I say it takes some time.
Dr.M.Basti