Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Diadein: To Bind Around/Across

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Paul Stelzner - 24 Jul 2008 02:10 GMT
Experimental results of looking at matter shows a fundamental
particle/wave duality. This duality has been shown to be constant and
valid through experiments that condition a view to particle like, or
wave like results. This anomaly of results has caused considerable
consternation, and out-right rebuke from traditionalists; but empirical
evidence continually shows this dichotomy to be a fact of nature.

    The diadein hypothesis postulates that all particles and forces
exhibit a field-like and a point-like aspect when viewed from
experimental perspectives, because they have those aspects as
constituent ratios of their make-up; they are made of those ratios and
will show the aspect that is conditioned by the view availed by the
experiment:

    We set up an experiment that will show wave-like properties of
photons, and we then see interference properties; we set up an
experiment to show a particle-like nature to light, and see the
photo-electric effect.

    This particle/wave duality can be bridged, or bound across
(diadein) by viewing the particle and the wave conditions exhibited, as
conditional aspects that are inculcated within each particle or force, a
ratio of potentiality that conditions our view depending on the
experiment we set up to view material nature. An attempt at an
explanation of the diadein hypothesis using the Mandelbrot set as a
conceptual metaphor can be found at:
http://community.webtv/net/paul707/TheDiadeinParadigm

P.C.Stelzner
Paul Stelzner - 24 Jul 2008 02:45 GMT
http://community.webtv.net/paul707/TheDiadeinParadigm
Sam Wormley - 24 Jul 2008 03:22 GMT
> http://community.webtv.net/paul707/TheDiadeinParadigm

  Pretty much garbage... but you know that!  :-)
tadchem - 24 Jul 2008 10:30 GMT
>      Experimental results of looking at matter shows a fundamental
> particle/wave duality. This duality has been shown to be constant and
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> P.C.Stelzner

Experiments that are designed to detect wave properties detect wave
properties.

Experiments that are designed to detect particle properties detect
particle properties.

No surprise there.

Remember always that "waves" and "particles" are idealized
mathematical representations.

Matter is matter and energy is energy.

A photon is not a particle and it is not a wave. A photon is a photon.

The conundrum is an artifact of the mathematical models we are using.

Switch to another mathematical model such as a complex-valued four-
tensor field that satisfies Maxwell's unified equations and can, when
acted upon by an operator, reconfigure itself to a non-localized wave
or a localized particle, and the ambiguity vanishes.

Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
Uncle Al - 24 Jul 2008 17:08 GMT
>      Experimental results of looking at matter shows a fundamental
> particle/wave duality. This duality has been shown to be constant and
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> will show the aspect that is conditioned by the view availed by the
> experiment:
[snip rest of crap]

"The sky is blue because that is the system default" is not a theory.

Signature

Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

Paul Stelzner - 26 Jul 2008 07:50 GMT
Uncle Al,

    The diadein is not about what is obvious; blue sky is a system
default?

    Particle/wave duality is a characteristic of experimental
results.The underlying reason for material reality to appear as
particle-like when viewed one way, and wave-like when viewed another is
a mystery of modern physics.

    The question: is material reality particle-like, or is it wave-like
(interference or concussion); which one is the correct way of viewing
material science?

    I consider this a specious argument, the correct view is that both
are true because both aspects are intertwined, we see wave-like because
there is a wave-like component to the elements involved; we see a
particle-like component because there is a point-like aspect involved.
We must use a ratio of these two 'ultimate' conditions to fully model
these parts of the material world. These parts, whether leptons,
hadrons, molecules, planets, solar systems, galaxies, or the universe at
large, must have a point-like component and a wave-like aspect
incorporated in a mathematical model to fully realize a full explanation
of their material nature.

P.C.Stelzner
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.