Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

The requirements for existence; they're nothing.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Osmium - 24 Jul 2008 16:36 GMT
If, at first, nothing exists then the requirement for something to
come into existence is very small---in fact it is nothing.  Therefore
the merest thought, with nothing to oppose it, will cause something
material to come into existence.

And even if some "things" exist but they do not oppose the thought of
other things not yet in existence, these second things must
immediately come into existence.  Specifically I am thinking of new
mathematical formulas.  Only when they are first thought of does a
corresponding real object arise.
Uncle Al - 24 Jul 2008 17:15 GMT
> If, at first, nothing exists then the requirement for something to
> come into existence is very small---in fact it is nothing.
[snip crap]

  1) Classical vacuum
  2) Heisenberg
  3) Casimir effect, Lamb shift, Rabi vacuum oscillation, electron
anomalous g-factor...

> Only when they are first thought of does a
> corresponding real object arise.

  4) f.cking imbecile

Signature

Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

Sanforized - 25 Jul 2008 00:39 GMT
>>If, at first, nothing exists then the requirement for something to
>>come into existence is very small---in fact it is nothing.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>    4) f.cking imbecile

Which he wouldn't be unless he thought he was.
DougC - 24 Jul 2008 17:54 GMT
> If, at first, nothing exists then the requirement for something to
> come into existence is very small---in fact it is nothing. �Therefore
> the merest thought, with nothing to oppose it, will cause something
> material to come into existence.

Pre-existence, what is doing the thinking?

Doug Chandler
Igor - 25 Jul 2008 00:13 GMT
> If, at first, nothing exists then the requirement for something to
> come into existence is very small---in fact it is nothing.  Therefore
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> mathematical formulas.  Only when they are first thought of does a
> corresponding real object arise.

That sort of mental masturbation usually requires alot of vaseline and
much deeper strokes.
Osmium - 25 Jul 2008 01:30 GMT
> > If, at first, nothing exists then the requirement for something to
> > come into existence is very small---in fact it is nothing. �Therefore
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> That sort of mental masturbation usually requires alot of vaseline and
> much deeper strokes.

Naw, It worked for me---well, with an 8 by 10 glossy of Uncle Al on
hand for inspiration.
Mitch Raemsch - 25 Jul 2008 00:27 GMT
> If, at first, nothing exists then the requirement for something to
> come into existence is very small---in fact it is nothing.  Therefore
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> mathematical formulas.  Only when they are first thought of does a
> corresponding real object arise.

Stop playing God Os. God is Creator.

Mitch Raemsch
Sanforized - 25 Jul 2008 00:42 GMT
>>If, at first, nothing exists then the requirement for something to
>>come into existence is very small---in fact it is nothing.  Therefore
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Stop playing God Os. God is Creator.

You create your own God(s).
Mitch Raemsch - 25 Jul 2008 00:49 GMT
> >>If, at first, nothing exists then the requirement for something to
> >>come into existence is very small---in fact it is nothing.  Therefore
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

NO. I had a beginning because of God.

Mitch Raemsch
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.