Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

"The Arrow of Time"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Fos - 31 Jul 2008 14:09 GMT
"The Arrow of Time"

    Over the years the immutable passage of time from  past to future has
been likened to the passage of an arrow, "the Arrow of Time". There have
been numerous speculations as to why time should only progress in that
direction and not occasionally progress from future to past. The physical
explanation that has evolved is based upon the concept that the physical
Universe "moves" from order to disorder and it is this "movement",
mathematically defined as increasing "entropy", which determined the passage
of time.

    Under General Relativity, the energy contained in the Universe is
asserted to continuously increases, supplied from an unknown source, as time
passes. When one corrects General Relativity for the sophomoric mathematical
error Dr. Einstein made in its derivation, the reason for the direction of
"time's arrow" becomes apparent. As shown in
http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm, as a material object is lowered (falls)
in a gravitational field, the energy equivalent of its mass  (expressed in
ABSOLUTE terms) decreases with the decrease in energy appearing as the
energy of fall. This energy of fall is released in the form of heat and
radiation, both of which serve to increase the overall entropy (or the
reduction in the availability of energy if you prefer the term) of the
system.

    In order to reverse the direction of times arrow, it is necessary to
recollect this energy and return it to the masses! Since this is a patent
impossibility, the "Arrow of Time " must point from present to future.

    The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997); http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm 
(1987); and http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE
ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS
TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE
MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.

    All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at the
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.

    Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

    E-mail:- einsteinhoax@isp.com. If you wish a reply, be sure that your
mail reception is not blocked.

    The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.
Uncle Al - 31 Jul 2008 20:01 GMT
> "The Arrow of Time"
[snip crap]

  1) Feynman's sprinkler experiment
  2) idiot

>      E-mail:- einsteinhoax@isp.com.
[snip rest of crap]

<http://www.edu-observatory.org/physics-faq/Relativity/SR/experiments.html>
Experimental constraints on Special Relativity

<http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2006-3/>
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0311039
Experimental constraints on General Relativity

Idiot.

Signature

Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.