 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / November 2008Nedwsgroup crammed funn of crackpots
Is there a talk.physics newsgroup? My NNTP server does not list one, though I would think a moderated physics newsgroup woulod already exist. I have an interest in physics, and trying to pick the non-kook articles out of the much, much larger kook articles in this newsgroup takes a great deal of time. I make YouTube videos on the subject of "free energy," and I am tired of doing so. I am not a physicist, nor am I educated. I would love to see people actually educated in the subject make YouTube videos debunking "free energy" claims.  Signaturehttp://desertphile.org Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz > Is there a talk.physics newsgroup? My NNTP server does not list > one, though I would think a moderated physics newsgroup woulod [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > would love to see people actually educated in the subject make > YouTube videos debunking "free energy" claims. There is no charge for sunlight, kook. What do you want, a movie of the Sun? > > Is there a talk.physics newsgroup? My NNTP server does not list > > one, though I would think a moderated physics newsgroup woulod [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > would love to see people actually educated in the subject make > > YouTube videos debunking "free energy" claims. > There is no charge for sunlight, kook. What do you want, a movie > of the Sun? Sunlight isn't free energy, fucktard. Signaturehttp://desertphile.org Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz >> > Is there a talk.physics newsgroup? My NNTP server does not list >> > one, though I would think a moderated physics newsgroup woulod [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Sunlight isn't free energy, fucktard. Ok, you can start paying me for it, retarded dumbfuck. On Nov 22, 1:45 pm, Desertphile <desertph...@invalid-address.net> wrote: > Is there a talk.physics newsgroup? My NNTP server does not list > one, though I would think a moderated physics newsgroup woulod [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water > "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz http://www.crank.net/ http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html and somewhat redundantly: http://www.ka9q.net/crackpots/index.html http://www.phact.org/e/con_man.htm and for a laugh or two: http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/museum/unwork.htm HTH Tom Davidson Richmond, VA On Nov 22, 1:45 pm, Desertphile <desertph...@invalid-address.net> wrote: > Is there a talk.physics newsgroup? My NNTP server does not list > one, though I would think a moderated physics newsgroup woulod [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water > "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz http://www.crank.net/ http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html and somewhat redundantly: http://www.ka9q.net/crackpots/index.html http://www.phact.org/e/con_man.htm and for a laugh or two: http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/museum/unwork.htm HTH Tom Davidson Richmond, VA Fits your buddy Einstein to a tee, Tom. On Nov 22, 1:45 pm, Desertphile <desertph...@invalid-address.net> wrote: > Is there a talk.physics newsgroup? My NNTP server does not list > one, though I would think a moderated physics newsgroup woulod [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water > "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz Try sci.physics.research This is a moderated physics newsgroup. There are others. Harry C. On Nov 22, 4:44 pm, "hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Nov 22, 1:45 pm, Desertphile <desertph...@invalid-address.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > Harry C. As an afterthough, if you attempt to post anything about Free Energy on sci.physics.research, be sure that your "Free Energy" term refers to the thermodynamics parameter having this name, otherwise the group moderator might be tempted to "cut you a new one". The moderated science newsgroups are best read for a year, before attempting to post to them. In a way this strike me as funny, since 10 years ago sci.physics operated at this level, where even physicist hesitated a bit prior to posting. Today you can see what the "Dumbing down of America" coupled with the fact that even a total idiot can now post to Usenet has led to. As a consequence, today all serious scientific discussion groups are now moderated, and to spare the work of the moderator, tend to conceal the fact that they even exist. Trust me, there are many such Newsgroups, that address just about every scientific subject. Now. simply in kindess, study university level physics for a few years and you will first learn the language of physics, plus learn where the real physics discussion newsgroups are today. If you current NNTP server does not reveal them to you, then all I can suggest is that you need a better news server. Harry C. > On Nov 22, 4:44 pm, "hhc...@yahoo.com" <hhc...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > On Nov 22, 1:45 pm, Desertphile <desertph...@invalid-address.net> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > > would love to see people actually educated in the subject make > > > YouTube videos debunking "free energy" claims. > > Try sci.physics.research > > > > This is a moderated physics newsgroup. There are others. > > > > Harry C. > As an afterthough, if you attempt to post anything about Free Energy > on sci.physics.research, be sure that your "Free Energy" term refers [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > the fact that they even exist. Trust me, there are many such > Newsgroups, that address just about every scientific subject. talk.origins I read daily, and it has turned into a Creationist cess pool.... but it was specifically designed to draw Creationists awar from serious newsgroups about biology. I suppose this newsgroup (sci.physics) has become the talk.origins of physics. There was a time when the sci.* newsgroups were mostly meat and damn little nutcases. > Now. simply in kindess, study university level physics for a few years > and you will first learn the language of physics, plus learn where the [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Harry C. Greetings. I am self-educated on phytsics (Newtonian and electromagnetic) but I would like to have an actually physicist or two make YouTube videos debunking "free energy." I have made dozens of such videos and I have done a good job as far as I can tell, but I am bloody tired of it. The "Free energy" cultists in YouTube are much like Creationists, Scientology customers, and Moonies when it comes to trying to educate them on the subject. Signaturehttp://desertphile.org Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz > On Nov 22, 1:45 pm, Desertphile <desertph...@invalid-address.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > would love to see people actually educated in the subject make > > YouTube videos debunking "free energy" claims. > Try sci.physics.research > This is a moderated physics newsgroup. There are others. Thank you: I will see the the NNTP server I use has that newsgroup. > Harry C. Signaturehttp://desertphile.org Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz > Is there a talk.physics newsgroup? My NNTP server does not list > one, though I would think a moderated physics newsgroup woulod [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > would love to see people actually educated in the subject make > YouTube videos debunking "free energy" claims. Very interesting web site! I enjoyed it very much. SignatureTom Potter http://www.geocities.com/tdp1001/index.html http://notsocrazyideas.blogspot.com http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/ http://tdp1001.wiki.zoho.com http://groups.msn.com/PotterPhotos http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/dingleberry.htm > Is there a talk.physics newsgroup? My NNTP server does not list > one, though I would think a moderated physics newsgroup woulod [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > would love to see people actually educated in the subject make > YouTube videos debunking "free energy" claims. Very interesting web site! I enjoyed it very much. ========================= Have you got a touch of the Sun too? How does *he* estimates the age of the petroglyphs at 3700 BCE? *I* estimate them at 2645.68 BCE, so who's right and how shall we prove it? SignatureTom Potter http://www.geocities.com/tdp1001/index.html http://notsocrazyideas.blogspot.com http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/ http://tdp1001.wiki.zoho.com http://groups.msn.com/PotterPhotos http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/dingleberry.htm >> Very interesting web site! >> I enjoyed it very much. Thank you. > Have you got a touch of the Sun too? > How does *he* estimates the age of the petroglyphs at 3700 BCE? > *I* estimate them at 2645.68 BCE, so who's right and how shall > we prove it? Er, many tribes in what is now Utah, Nevada, Arizona, and California used charcol to highlight pictographs and petroglyphs, and that charcol can still be detected. Signaturehttp://desertphile.org Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz >>> Very interesting web site! >>> I enjoyed it very much. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > California used charcol to highlight pictographs and petroglyphs, > and that charcol can still be detected. Err, I still estimate them at 2645.68 BCE, so who's right and how shall we prove it, illiterate fucktard? > Is there a talk.physics newsgroup? My NNTP server does not list > one, though I would think a moderated physics newsgroup woulod [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > would love to see people actually educated in the subject make > YouTube videos debunking "free energy" claims. Very interesting web site! I enjoyed it very much. SignatureBTW, I estimate this petroglyph to be Nov 6, 1928 AD. http://elmerfudd.us/dp/petro/rochester/art-9.jpg > Is there a talk.physics newsgroup? My NNTP server does not list > one, though I would think a moderated physics newsgroup woulod > already exist. sci.physics.research > I have an interest in physics, and trying to pick > the non-kook articles out of the much, much larger kook articles > in this newsgroup takes a great deal of time. Killfiles are the solution. Kooks are persistent, and once you have a large list of them that get filtered out, the task of maintaining the list is easy. I recommend using a newsreader that can filter out not only kooks, but also replies to kooks. At the moment, 40tude Dialog will do this for you if you're using Windows, and I believe there are some other newsreaders that will do it if you're running Linux, but I'd have to do a search. Also, Thunderbird and Seamonkey should have this feature in the near future, due to the work of Joshua Cranmer ( see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11054 ) SignatureJim E. Black (domain in headers) How to filter out stupid arguments in 40tude Dialog: !markread,ignore From "Name" +"<email address>" [X] Watch/Ignore works on subthreads >> Is there a talk.physics newsgroup? My NNTP server does not list >> one, though I would think a moderated physics newsgroup woulod [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > to the work of Joshua Cranmer ( see > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11054 ) Addendum: The feature is present in the nightly build of Thunderbird at http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/nightly/latest-trunk/ if anyone else wants to try it out. Next step for me is to figure out how to import my killfile from Dialog. SignatureJim E. Black On Nov 22, 12:45 pm, Desertphile <desertph...@invalid-address.net> wrote: > Is there a talk.physics newsgroup? My NNTP server does not list > one, though I would think a moderated physics newsgroup woulod [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water > "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDpFfT_izI8 On Nov 22, 7:45 pm, Desertphile <desertph...@invalid-address.net> wrote: > I make YouTube videos on the subject of "free energy," http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duZtNZZpNEc hahahahahahaha Desertphile <desertph...@invalid-address.net> wrote: I make YouTube videos on the subject of "free energy," http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duZtNZZpNEc hahahahahahaha hanson wrote: .... ahahaha... Thanks for the link. I like this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoDpg3NKKGk wherein he rails against (air) pollution like a mad man... (1) while sitting in front of an open wood fire creating pollution, (2) & preaching standard doom like all little green idiots do... .. both acts arising from the obvious fact, him confessing: "I, the Desertphile, am not a physicist, nor am I educated". Thanks for the laughs... ahahahaha... ahahahanson > Desertphile <desertph...@invalid-address.net> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Thanks for the laughs... ahahahaha... ahahahanson Did you notice he is like the overunity version of Dr. Schund? At least 130% randament. He should get a honorary physics diploma for this? I think the Einsteinians need him? His material is at least 3 times as convincing as "what the bleep". hahahahahahaa Anyway, now you see what the free energy inventors have to keep up with? HAHAHAHAHA I see no way to refute his arguments? aaahahaha Or perhaps I do? http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=5D2EA02EABD01947 ohhhhhh ohhh? violate the law! This is not allowed!!! Send in the desert storm troupers! hahahahahaha This is also funny, he is against hydrogen cars also. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dz8rzgzJWbY He makes a nice Hindenburg memorial statement. Anyways, hear you go deserted trouper: http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=2FA9wiMkXwE Moar factoids here: http://knol.google.com/k/gaby-de-wilde/water-fueled-car/1yrf1mzjtxzk5/2 I expect a full report on my desk by 6 am. :-) You know? "Give me proof you read it you @$#$@ and you #@$@#% and you ^$%#%# hahahahahahaha ______ http://blog.360.yahoo.com/factuurexpress > Is there a talk.physics newsgroup? My NNTP server does not list > one, though I would think a moderated physics newsgroup woulod [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > would love to see people actually educated in the subject make > YouTube videos debunking "free energy" claims. Yesterday I installed NewsProxy and I spent an hour loading the killfile with the list of kooks here in sci.physics. Then I retrieved new articles. Out of 466 articles, 60 of them got past the twit filter. That's a high twit-to-sane-person ratio. Now the newsgroup is readable. Signaturehttp://desertphile.org Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.