 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Physics / General Physics / July 2009Quantum Orbitals EXACTLY simulate Kepler motion
Disregarding Cloud and Uncertainty principles (explained at the very bottom), Quantum Atomic Orbitals EXACTLY simulate Kepler motion. The TWO differences would be: (1) the central Planet attracts and it's multiple moons instead repulse each other and (2) the focal point (Planet) is outside of the multiple moons' elliptical orbits. The moon orbitals would then change from elliptical to the exact same as "TEAR DROP" elliptical quantum orbitals (elliptical orbital shape = one end sharp, the other end round) for the sole reason due to charge field density. KEPLER MOTION: The farther away = gradual = bottom end of tear drop, the more the moons disperse so that their inter-repulsive force becomes weaker than the planets attractive force = the round end of elliptical orbit. As they then fall back toward the attractive planet, they crunch together and due to very intense repulsion (= immediate) they bounce back away from the planet = the sharp end of elliptical orbit. Both "ends" above form a tear drop elliptal orbit similar to quantum tear drop orbitals. ---------------------------------------------------------- As for the clound and Uncertainty principles, instead of dried matter, the moons would be more in a early universe hot dense soup or plasma shape. And for such their plasma (hot lava) densities along the orbitals would be more wave like shape. Yes Earth/moons initially were ejected SOLAR CORE's hot lava that gradually cooled down and due to possible charge and magneto nature of hot iron lave nature their early orbitals may very well more resembled quantum orbitals. Which would also justify and explain their presently preserved angular spin day & night momentum. On Jul 25, 5:07 pm, "gu...@hotmail.com" <gu...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Disregarding Cloud and Uncertainty principles (explained at the very > bottom), Quantum Atomic Orbitals EXACTLY simulate Kepler motion. You know this because? Do you understand the physics of Kepler's Orbit, or are you simply pissing in the wind? In what respect do you find Quantum Atomic Orbital (whatever these are) similar in what respect to Kepler's planetary orbits. Have you actually ever even read what's the basis of a planetary orbit per Kepler, and how could anyone possibly observe this at the atomic level? Harry C. > On Jul 25, 5:07 pm, "gu...@hotmail.com" <gu...@hotmail.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Harry C. Like most of the idiots who infest this group, the moron guskz is incapable of comprehending what science is. It believes that doing science consists of sitting in a chair, trying (but failing) to think, then spewing whatever crap comes from its mis- firing neurons. Arrogance causes it to believe that all of its crap is gospel. Paul Cardinale > > On Jul 25, 5:07 pm, "gu...@hotmail.com" <gu...@hotmail.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > - Show quoted text - No it comes from observation and clarifying the similar observations to generate the mechanism. > On Jul 25, 5:07 pm, "gu...@hotmail.com" <gu...@hotmail.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Harry C. Poor Harry can't read. Every single sentence that followed explaines it. On Jul 25, 5:07 pm, "gu...@hotmail.com" <gu...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Disregarding Cloud and Uncertainty principles (explained at the very > bottom), Quantum Atomic Orbitals EXACTLY simulate Kepler motion. The [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > Which would also justify and explain their presently preserved angular > spin day & night momentum. Google "spherical harmonics" Google "Legendre Polynimials" Google "Spherical Bessel functions" Ellipses are for particle physics, not wave physics. Specifically ellipses are peculiar to conservative central forces acting at infinite speed. And, of course, your elliptical bodily orifices. Tom Davidson Richmond, VA > On Jul 25, 5:07 pm, "gu...@hotmail.com" <gu...@hotmail.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Never Heard of Electomagnetic waves Dr. Tommy, any force that is offset from it's source inlcuding magnetism or charge, has lost it's focal point and thus generates elliptical characteristics in relation to the force. Likewise for Optical deviation = more electromagagnetic waves = photons dispersed through lensing effects. Go back to school. On Jul 25, 5:07 pm, "gu...@hotmail.com" <gu...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Disregarding Cloud and Uncertainty principles (explained at the very > bottom), Quantum Atomic Orbitals EXACTLY simulate Kepler motion. The > TWO differences would be: (1) the central Planet attracts and it's > multiple moons instead repulse each other and (2) the focal point > (Planet) is outside of the multiple moons' elliptical orbits. [snip] Seriously, it's tofulator brand physics. http://www.tofulator.com/ You hear the sounds and have zero understanding. But they sound like things you have some vague and inaccurate understanding of. So you assume that you know what is going on. Those "tear drop" shapes exist in Hydrogen atoms with *one* electron only. They do not arise from electrons interacting with other electrons. The orbits of planets are in no way similar to the orbitals in an atom. Quantum particles cannot be said to move through an orbital in the same way a planet moves through an orbit. Your guff about planets being ejected from the sun is just that, guff. That's not how things work in any slightest way. It's simply tofulator. There are way many other problems with your grunge. But those are enough to cause a rational person to go get a text book and start reading. Do the homework assignments. And don't be posting silly drivel in the mean time. Socks [snip] > There are way many other problems with your grunge. > But those are enough to cause a rational person to go > get a text book and start reading. Do the homework > assignments. And don't be posting silly drivel in the > mean time. Well, hopefully at least it has prompted some rational people do some reading and maybe learn something :):) Thought there seems to be a shortage of that sort of person in the relativity newsgroup :):) > On Jul 25, 5:07 pm, "gu...@hotmail.com" <gu...@hotmail.com> wrote:> Disregarding Cloud and Uncertainty principles (explained at the very > > bottom), Quantum Atomic Orbitals EXACTLY simulate Kepler motion. The [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > electron only. They do not arise from electrons interacting > with other electrons. What a tofulator you are. Those atoms are not single hydrogen atoms, but multiple atoms. idiot. > The orbits of planets are in no way similar to the orbitals in > an atom. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > mean time. > Socks > On Jul 25, 5:07 pm, "gu...@hotmail.com" <gu...@hotmail.com> wrote:> Disregarding Cloud and Uncertainty principles (explained at the very > > bottom), Quantum Atomic Orbitals EXACTLY simulate Kepler motion. The [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > mean time. > Socks Said the student to the master. Imagine the early universe where matter is not formed yet. Quarks soup and hot plasma. Know imagine this hot plasma in orbitals. Saw your lips move, some puppet. > > On Jul 25, 5:07 pm, "gu...@hotmail.com" <gu...@hotmail.com> wrote:> Disregarding Cloud and Uncertainty principles (explained at the very > > > bottom), Quantum Atomic Orbitals EXACTLY simulate Kepler motion. The [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Neutrons are original matter. Mitch Raemsch |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2010 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.