Am Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:51:07 -0700 schrieb Triacon Tahedron
<wsjf8@royal.net> in
77a92e3d-2b4e-4083-9956-aa14950748a8@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com:
> Appears to me, that relativity is the only theory I know, having no
> mathematical beauty
The mathematical beauty is that aside from 3 basic physics axioms all of
the theory is derived from mathematical principles.
> And the predictions they make, are prior knowledge predicions
Not true: see below.
> What kind of reverse engineer predictions are these, when you already
> know the results of the predictions
>
> As with planet Mercury, he knew the results, than he made the
> predictions in a way that it correspond with the priory reverse engineer
> knowledge he had
Actually Relativity predicted it first in 1915 and then in 1919 the
observational result was obtained.
cf
http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Cyberia/NumRel/EinsteinTest.html
Obviously you don't understand what you are critisizing.
> Also, the muons, before they been detected at the surface of oceans,
> there been no any predictions about them at all
Now you are contradicting yourself. Besides, Relativity doesn't make any
predictions about the existence of particles, only their behavior.
> Hahahahaaa, then they came with the postmortem predictions
>
> One hundred years of fata morgana relativity predictions, where is the
> mathematical beauty of relativity!!
You need to take a science class.
Mind you, I'm not defending Einstein. I just don't understand why people
like you have to base their arguments on ignorance of the subject they
are critisizing.

Signature
// The TimeLord says:
// Pogo 2.0 = We have met the aliens, and they are us!