Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / July 2008

On Jul 26, 10:06 pm, "greysky" <grey...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Yet all I have is your word that you aren't talking out your a.s. You
have no independent verification of what you say, even though what you
have right now would make you very rich.

Funny how people here are always sitting on discoveries that would
make them very rich, famous, or both.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

You seem hung up on "rich". Why? Lucre has never been a motivator for me. I
have enough money to do what I want, pretty much. Even as it is, I am pretty
tied down by my possessions more than I would like.  I know a few rich men -
one almost a billionair who made his money buying chains of commercial radio
and tv stations and it would be easy for me to get further funding from this
guy for a percentage. But then things would begin to spiral out of my
control and I wouldn't be a happy camper anymore. I also would be as
miserable a huiman being as this guy is... that's another thing I see in
rich people. They are amongst the most miserable souls God ever created.
Maybe my hangup is that I'm not smart enough to figure out how to be both
happy and rich at the same time.

But you are also very right. I can't keep sitting on my device forever. I
eventualy need to make a decision and come clean. You see, I am also a bit
of a history buff, and I too get upset when I hear about all the marvelous /
wierd inventions that people have been talking about for the last hundred
years, and knowing they are lost treasures:  Coral Castle, where Ed
Leedskalnin found a way to levitate blocks of stone weighing many tons, but
the secret has been lost. Or another example being Hans Coler and his free
energy device. True? False? We will never know because these and many other
secrets discovered by inventors looking to make a buck were taken to their
graves when their plans fell apart. All because of money... If I die with my
'secret' I am confident that it will be a very long time before someone else
rediscovers it, if ever. Even I conceede that would be a crime against
humanity. The field of quantum mechanics would especially suffer. Not so
much relativity, but superluminal action within a quantum framework makes it
[QM] almost a conceptual science - something Bohr would enjoy knowing about
if he were still alive. Feynman would no longer be able to call the results
of the double slit experiment  a 'mystery', and so it goes.

Oh what the hell, I'll say this much at least: when you look at the double
slit [n-slit experiment] in operation, you are witnessing the heart of
superluminal communication happening. Others try using calcite crystals to
create linked photons in EPR type setups to make a superluminal
communicator, but that way will never work because the spin states or other
quantum operators can never be controlled to be able to make a signalling
device that doesn't rely on stochastic randomess. But it is a signpost
showing nature does allow instant signalling of a sort. Others approach the
problem through quantum tunneling. This is a dead end as well, unless you
can figure out a way to make a very long tunnel. Though my approach is
unique, it does have a familial relation to those old methods. They are
related in the same manner a man is related to a microbe.

Another thing my research has led me to develop is a very startling
discovery concerning what most people call wormholes. Common thought is that
if they can be created they are impractical  because it will take large
amounts of exotic matter to enlarge them and to keep them open. My
superluminal pipeline, the thing that makes FTL possible, is somewhat
analogous to a wormhole. I have discovered that far from using huge amounts
of wierd energies to enlarge and sustain a 'pipeline / wormhole' it instead
takes Nothing at all to create these things, and the closer you can get to
'pure nothing' the larger and more stable they become. Within a sutiably
biased Casimir shield, they literally generate in huge numbers when
conditions are right. If my FTL pipeline is a form of stable wormhole, then
it is, with a bit of effort, within our ability set to create and maintain
them right now - exotic matter is unnecessary to create the negative energy
state..  Indeed, for the past 8 years, I've been studying the properties of
stable pipelines and characterizing them, and steadily learning about what
exactly they are and how they operate. More and more, I find I can apply
what other physicists are theorizing about wormholes almost directly to FTL
pipelines. It's really exciting and heady stuff!   At this point I'm just
smart enough to recognize this as a jumping off point into string theory,
but that's about it.

At the very least, I'll probably put a clause into my Last Will and
Testament to release the complete plans and all subsequent devices generated
by them to the public domain - which means of course, no one will be able to
patent them and control the technology. It'll be a free-for-all I am glad I
wont be a part of.

Of course, if I do decide to do that, it means you're going to have to wait
a bit before you see your 'proof'.....

Greysky

www.allocations.cc
Learn how to build a FTL radio.