Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / December 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

"Terrestrial Aberration"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
funkenstein - 28 Dec 2008 15:27 GMT
I have recently been reading about experiments designed to observe
"terrestrial aberration".  The idea as I understand it is to observe a
relative motion of space-time with respect to the laboratory (some
authors call such motion 'absolute' for reasons unclear to me).
However unlike the usual spectroscopic or speed measurements designed
for this purpose, here only an angular displacement is desired.

My literature search thus far revealed a series of two correspondances
on this topic:

"Bradley aberration proposed to measure absolute velocity of closed
laboratory", J.P. Wesley, Foundations of Physics Letters 1989

with self reply / correction:

"Terrestrial Bradley aberration cannot be observed", J.P.Wesley, F. of
Phys. Lett., 1990

It appears to me his correction is based on experimental factors, and
not on any fundamental flaw in the technique.

Again more recently:

"Measure of absolute speed through the Bradley aberration of light
beams on a three-axis frame", Georges Sardin, Europhysics Letters 53
(3) 310-316 (2001).

with reply and measurement:

"Comment on „Measure of absolute speed through the Bradley aberration
of light beams on a three-axis frame", Kwiek Piotr, Sikorski Jerzy,
Europhysics Letters 2002r. no. 58; 312-313

Here an attempt was made to measure the affect, though no maximum
possible shift in position of light arrival was observed.

Any comments or other literature you can suggest about this idea would
be greatly appreciated!
Koobee Wublee - 29 Dec 2008 06:08 GMT
> I have recently been reading about experiments designed to observe
> "terrestrial aberration".  The idea as I understand it is to observe a
> relative motion of space-time with respect to the laboratory (some
> authors call such motion 'absolute' for reasons unclear to me).
> However unlike the usual spectroscopic or speed measurements designed
> for this purpose, here only an angular displacement is desired.

After wading through the mysticisms about how the velocity of the
source does not affect aberration and how aberration is a phenomenon
of special relativity, aberration is none other than an application of
Doppler effect.  It can easily be explained with the Galilean
transform where the velocity of the source does matter.

Despite aberration being an application of the Galilean transform, it
was not discovered until Bradley’s time.  While looking for parallax,
he accidentally discovered aberration.  Today, we still have
professors in universities confused of parallax from aberration.
Bradley had an excuse of this confusion.  I don’t think these
professors have any excuses.

Professor Andersen in Norway somewhere claimed aberration is source
velocity independent while Professor Carlip of UC Davis claimed
gravitational aberration is target independent.  Both contradict each
other.  Both failed to accommodate the principle of relativity in
their applications.  Oh, well.  Mysticism is here to stay in the so-
called theories of special and general relativity.  <shrug>

Orwellian teaching is once again identified:

**       FAITH IS THEORY
**   MYSTICISM IS WISDOM
**   IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE
**  PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY
**  CONJECTURE IS REALITY
**   BELIEVING IS LEARNING
**       LYING IS TEACHING
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.