Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / February 2005

I was posting on another list when one of the readers suggested I use my
reply as a general introduction to the Aether Physics Model on these
newsgroups.  So here is how the Aether Physics Model came to be.

I was working on a flat spiral coil and placing a fluorescent tube between
the top load and ground wire of the coil.  I noticed that the spark going to
the topload was a thin purple streamer and the spark going to the ground was
a thick, white streamer.

Until then, I was under the impression that electricity changed its outward
form because of the coil arrangement, frequency, current, potential, etc.
But here I had a single coil, the same shape feeding both ends.  The same
frequency existed at both ends.  But it became evident that the potential
was greater on the topload and the current was greater on the ground end.
As a result of these differences, the appearance of the spark changed
dramatically.

Thus I surmised that the same electrons in a given coil can manifest in two
distinctly different forms.  I then posted this observation on the pupman
list and began searching the literature for an explanation.  Finding none, I
decided to investigate physics from the ground up to see if something was
missed.

It didn't take but a few days before I realized that charge should be
distributed in the math, since it is also distributed in nature.  Ed Philips
suggested I read Great Experiments in Physics so I purchased a copy.  In
this book Charles Coulomb himself clearly stated that all charge must be
distributed in order for the inverse square law to work.

The first thing I noticed in physics was that Coulomb's constant was
precisely equal to a combination of light speed, permeability, permittivity,
and a conductance constant, which the established literature does not
recognize.  I then found that Planck's constant times the conductance
constant gives a distributed charge.  But I was disappointed that the
distributed charge it produced did not equal the elementary charge squared.
So I worked with the two distributed charges for a few hours before
discovering that they were exactly proportional to each other by way of 8pi
times the fine structure constant of the electron.  And so I had this
equation:

e^2 = 8pia e.emax^2

where e is the elementary charge, a is the fine structure of the electron,
and e.emax^2 is the derived value of charge equal to:

e.emax^2 = h * Cd

I then applied the same process to the proton and neutron and found fine
structures for both.  But since the fine structures and angular momentum of
the proton and neutron are not defined in modern physics, I really didn't
have an empirical body of data to go by there.  However, the lack of data
was encouraging since it implied that modern physics was incapable of
determining these values based on their chosen model of subatomic behavior.

Three weeks went by before it occurred to me that e.emax^2 could be strong
charge, which mediates the strong force.  I then realized that if it were,
then I was looking at the Unified Field Theory.  Further research showed me
that it has nothing to do with fields, but is rather a Unified Force Theory.
I later found that the concept of fields is very ambiguous in the Standard
Model and relativity theories, as modern science apparently does not know
what a field really is.

When I calculated the relative value of the forces for the different
subatomic particles, looking at both the electrostatic force and the new
concept of strong force, I found that the relative strengths of the forces
matched the empirical data.

Then I started reading older literature on electromagnetism.  I was
particularly struck by Ed Leedskalnin's description of electricity as a
stream of tiny magnets.  Although his view incorrectly denies the
electrostatic effect of electrons, he does show a convincing argument for
electrons acting as tiny magnets.  And then it occurred to me that
electromagnetism is caused by the strong charge.  Further analysis of the
mathematical aspects of the two charges revealed that electrostatic charge
has a spherical geometry while strong charge (or electromagnetic charge) has
a toroidal geometry.

When I applied this knowledge to my coil observations it made perfect sense.
When electrons are magnetically moving sideways in the coil, they produce
the bright white streamers.  When electrons are moving along their z axis,
they produce the thin purple streamers.  Electrons moving along their z axis
are creating pressure on the electrons in front of them, thus potential
increases.  Electrons moving sideways along the circular y axis and outward
on the x axis (it is a polar coordinate system) they move closer to each and
form longitudinal waves of electrons.

Hertz was broadcasting from the top load and Tesla was broadcasting from the
ground.  This is why Tesla's system of signaling was notably different from
Hertz.  Whereas Hertz's system caused the electrons to transform into
photons and radiate permanently away from the transmitter, thus causing
power loss, Tesla's system was pumped into the ground, which is a closed
system.  This allowed Tesla to longitudinally broadcast current through the
electrostatic field of the Earth and have that current return to his
transmitter.  Thus he could build up resonance within the Earth with very
little power loss.

But I as I was working on this Unified Force Theory, it occurred to me that
the units were in the wrong dimensions of charge, except three of them.  The
units of inductance, capacitance, and conductance were in the proper
distributed charge, while all other units with charge were in single
dimension.  Investigating the various changes that take place when the
dimensions are corrected in the units led me to the development of the
Aether Physics Model.