Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / March 2005

At present, there is no supportable rationalization regarding the
fundamentals of time or gravity.  Mankind clearly observes that both do
exist; yet we do not understand how or why. Newton's Law of gravity is still
utilized in modern time, despite it being over 300 years old. Although
millions of dollars have been spent worldwide building high-speed particle
accelerators (atom smashers), the force carrier for gravity still eludes
modern science to present day.  This website has been created to put forward
new perspectives to the science community, without contradiction of known
facts, based upon reliable observations of behaviours on Earth.

FACT - gravity is the only known force that we cannot shield, whereas an
"anti-gravity" effect could be created by "blocking gravitational
interactions" between objects.  Therefore, it is appropriate to state that
gravity travels through all physical objects, as opposed to being exchanged
between objects.  Ironically, although time is not recognized as a force in
science, it too affects all matter in a similar manner, and cannot be
shielded either. To date, no force carrier for gravity has been found,
supporting that it is not exchanged between objects.

FACT - since gravity travels through physical objects, this must have a
"cumulative net effect" upon matter, which can be quantified and measured in
some form.  A good example of this quantification is placing a wrinkled leaf
inside the pages of a book. The more "time" the leaf is inside the book; the
more "pressed" it becomes.  Yet the force of gravity acting upon the leaf
inside the book never changes, it's only the "cumulative net effect" of
gravity, which pressed the leaf flat.  This verifies that gravity indeed has
a "cumulative net effect" while passing through objects.

FACT - gravity defies the conservation of energy, as it indefinitely
converts potential energy to kinetic energy to maintain constant force
between physical objects, perpetually. Other than the obvious fact that mass
is energy, however, the energy is not exchanged while gravity maintains a
constant force between objects.

FACT - we assume that a black hole is an enormous gravitational field,
caused by a collapsed star, compacting matter so densely, it is singularity.
However, gravity is based upon mass, not density of mass.   Thus when a star
collapses, its mass doesn't change, thus its gravitational force doesn't
change, but then what changes?  This observation supports conclusions
contained herein

FACT - in Quantum Field Theory (QFT) gravity is virtually ignored, as its
interaction is nominal. Also, time behaves in a state of "controlled chaos",
cycling back and forth in a random manner.  Yet as physical mass
accumulates, both time and gravity become very stable, grow in influence,
and the force of gravity becomes the most powerful force in the Universe,
relative to physical mass.  This suggests there could be a relationship
between gravity and time, as both grow in influence and stabilize as energy
accumulates.

FACT - the speed of light ("C"), slows approximately 27% in velocity when
passed through water, yet returns to "C" when it exits the water.  This
defies physics, as there is no energy source to "re-accelerate" light back
to value of "C".   This observation supports conclusions contained herein.

FACT - Newton's Law states; Force = Mass x Acceleration (f=ma).  However,
this law does not explain why an object dropped from any height will be
deformed (by force) when impacting the Earth.  At the moment of impact, the
acceleration of an object is immediately reduced to ZERO, thus at that
precise moment, force = zero.  However, an egg dropped from a height of 5
feet will break when it impacts the floor, eventhough there is no force at
the moment of impact.  Therefore, there must be another element (a force),
which causes the egg to break.

FACT - the theory of flight is based upon the Bernoulli's Principle of fluid
dynamics, whereas the leading edge of a wing is designed with a camber to
accelerate airflow faster over the top surface of the wing, which in turn
creates lift.  However, this effect is negated during "inverted flight", as
the camber is also inverted; yet an aircraft can still maintain inverted
flight indefinitely. Therefore the Bernoulli's Principle is not applicable
to inverted flight; thus there must be another principle, which supports the
theory of flight, regardless of pitch, yaw, or roll angle of an aircraft, in
relationship to Earth.

Plausible answers can be found at  www.threexd.com

Regards,
Mark Oliver
markoliver@threexd.com