> Well again people had a hard time understanding me so I again went back
> and tried to write more clearly.
I notice you still have not addressed the issue of EM being a 4 vector and
gravity a tensor. Just what do you think you will accomplish by posting the
same stuff without addressing fundamental flaws?
>The saying that you can please some of
> the people some of the time but not all of the people all of the time
> is true.
That is not the issue - the issue is it is nonsense from very elementary
considerations.
Bill
> Im not going to post my copyrighted material but I will post
> my links to the pic graphicly and with text depicting my theory. Here
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> or
> http://www.geocities.com/reactor1967/btheory.jpg