 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / May 2005the basic of matter
what is the very basic property of matter that makes it able to organizes in complex stuctures, in daglig language called for "life" why would matter looks and try to understand itself? are atoms alive? > what is the very basic property of matter that makes it able to > organizes in complex stuctures, in daglig language called for "life" > > why would matter looks and try to understand itself? Because if it wouldn't, you wouldn't be here to ask that question. This is an example of the Coxonic Principle. Dirk Vdm > are atoms alive? >Because if it wouldn't, you wouldn't be here to ask that >question. This is an example of the Coxonic Principle. was it an attempting to answer the question? the question is as simple as it can be, what is that property of atom (or whatever) that makes it able to organize in complex forms > >Because if it wouldn't, you wouldn't be here to ask that > >question. This is an example of the Coxonic Principle. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > the question is as simple as it can be, what is that property of atom > (or whatever) that makes it able to organize in complex forms The urge to produce you, in order to have something around that asks that question. This is another example of the Coxonic Principle. Dirk Vdm >The urge to produce you, in order to have something around >that asks that question. This is another example of the >Coxonic Principle. then let me to reformulate the question why would matter looks and try to understand itself? are atoms alive? > >The urge to produce you, in order to have something around > >that asks that question. This is another example of the >Coxonic [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > are atoms alive? ==> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/d68e46304a6b727a Dirk Vdm > ==> > http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/d68e46304... >Dirk Vdm I understand now then the atoms must communicate with each other and work together, non-local , in order to acieve such a thing how are spatial dispersed atoms communicate with each other non-local,what do you know about non-local communication > > ==> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/d68e46304... > >Dirk Vdm > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > how are spatial dispersed atoms communicate with each other > non-local,what do you know about non-local communication If by non local communication you mean communication FTL then I would say about the same as anyone else since it has never been demonstrated. Indeed fundamental considerations from casualty cast serious doubt on its viability. Bill >If by non local communication you mean communication FTL then I would say >about the same as anyone else since it has never been demonstrated. Indeed >fundamental considerations from casualty cast serious doubt on its >viability. >Bill i dont know if it is faster then light or not, only that is a kind of communication, a link if you wish, at another level but this is advanced mathematics far beyound your level bill, so why bother > >If by non local communication you mean communication FTL then I would say > >about the same as anyone else since it has never been demonstrated. Indeed [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > but this is advanced mathematics far beyound your level bill, so why > bother It may be beyond my level but it is doubtful it is beyond some of the PhD's regularly post here - so how about the detail - or are you all hot air? Bill >It may be beyond my level but it is doubtful it is beyond some of the PhD's >regularly post here - so how about the detail - or are you all hot air? you dont have a phd, or a master or somthin else, but yuo have yuor arithemtics, we know a non-local communication dont need to respect the laws of physics (the known ones), heres the name "non-local", not to be confused with dimenssions, but yuo are a moron understanding sh.t anyway > >It may be beyond my level but it is doubtful it is beyond some of the PhD's > >regularly post here - so how about the detail - or are you all hot air? > > you dont have a phd, or a master or somthin else, but yuo have yuor > arithemtics, we know I know a something else I do have and you do not. Consideration for the purpose of this group. > a non-local communication dont need to respect the laws of physics (the > known ones), heres the name "non-local", not to be confused with > dimenssions, but yuo are a moron understanding sh.t anyway Did not post any math? I wonder why that does not surprise me. Bill >Did not post any math? I wonder why that does not surprise me. >Bill you mean arithmetics? > >Did not post any math? I wonder why that does not surprise me. > > >Bill > > you mean arithmetics? I meant what I said. Bill Los Coxones: >what is the very basic property of matter that makes it able to >organizes in complex stuctures, in daglig language called for "life" First, you'll have to provide a definition of ``life.'' >why would matter looks and try to understand itself? That's harder. You'll need to provide a definition of ``consciousness.'' >are atoms alive? Not according to any definition of ``alive'' which would make it useful to distinguish between alive and not alive. >First, you'll have to provide a definition of ``life.'' i dont know > >why would matter looks and try to understand itself? > That's harder. You'll need to provide a definition of ``consciousness.'' you are right a definition to unconsciousness could be good as well > >are atoms alive? > Not according to any definition of ``alive'' which would make it useful >to distinguish between alive and not alive. what do i know, you ae the smartest guy in the kichen > >First, you'll have to provide a definition of ``life.'' > > i dont know You use a word and you do not know the sense you mean it? > > >why would matter looks and try to understand itself? > > > That's harder. You'll need to provide a definition of ``consciousness.'' > > you are right > a definition to unconsciousness could be good as well Then sort out what you mean by words before you post in future. > > >are atoms alive? > > > Not according to any definition of ``alive'' which would make it useful > >to distinguish between alive and not alive. > > what do i know, you ae the smartest guy in the kichen Then try a little bit of self improvement - only post messages using words you know the meaning and context of. Bill >Then try a little bit of self improvement - only post messages using words >you know the meaning and context of. now tell us what those words means, sweet suzzy, becus we are fools with no education of anykind, tell us, what does your arithmetics saying? > >Then try a little bit of self improvement - only post messages using words > >you know the meaning and context of. > > now tell us what those words means, sweet suzzy, becus we are fools > with no education of anykind, tell us, what does your arithmetics > saying? You are the one that posted them. You should know what you mean by them. If not only post once you are certain of meaning and context. But considering all the other dyslexic troll tripe you have posted under the other names you use I doubt anything I say will stop you. Bill >You are the one that posted them. You should know what you mean by them. >If not only post once you are certain of meaning and context. But >considering all the other dyslexic troll tripe you have posted under the >other names you use I doubt anything I say will stop you. stopping me what? i like you bill, sorry, i just do it against you becus you are so easy, > >You are the one that posted them. You should know what you mean by them. > >If not only post once you are certain of meaning and context. But > >considering all the other dyslexic troll tripe you have posted under the > >other names you use I doubt anything I say will stop you. > > stopping me what? Posting the dyslexic troll tripe you do under multiple names. > i like you bill, sorry, i just do it against you becus you are so easy, It would be easier on all concerned to stick to the purpose of the group rather than what gives you jollies. Bill >Posting the dyslexic troll tripe you do under multiple names. only morons publish their real name on usenet, hahahah what a moron, are you afraid making a right stament and not getting the credits for it? hahaha, jerk you and dirk are the only morons around here, isnt it abvious? >> i like you bill, sorry, i just do it against you becus you are so easy, >It would be easier on all concerned to stick to the purpose of the group >rather than what gives you jollies. >Bill you fockin uneducated troll moron, pretending to understand maxwell knowing nothing about vetorfield operations etc, dare to dictate bullshit to other people? you are focking stoopid wo knowing it bill take a look at http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thread/884 0404bc7db1be6/2ffab55b7f2dfe5b?q=maxwell+bill+vector+field&rnum=2&hl=en#2ffab55b 7f2dfe5b How does matter transform from one form into another? Physics is about pure order. What is the source of the pure order? God of course. Order requires and orderer. God the Supreme Scientist created science. How do we grasp this pure orded? By the aether. Mitch - Time moves forward in every direction - Nick: >How does matter transform from one form >into another? If it's soft enough, you can just shape it with your hands, although liquids tend to not hold their shape too long. For something like marble, you'll need to obtain a good chisel and strike the end of the chisel with your head. I'd suggest searching google for tungsten chisels, if you expect it to last. >Physics is about pure order. >What is the source of the pure order? If that were true, those of us who are physicists could order you to shut up and go cliff diving in the grand cabyon. Since you don't appear to be headed for the grand canyon, you've disproven your assertion. Q.E.D. >God of course. Order requires and orderer. Thanks, but I can't take all the credit. I got some input at an atheists convention. >God the Supreme Scientist created science. Not only that, I created it so that you would forever be baffled by it. >How do we grasp this pure orded? When I receive a report that you've gone cliff diving in the grand canyon, I'll know you've grasped it. >By the aether. Sorry, I just sold the last one. You'll have to wait until tomorrow to buy one. >Mitch - Time moves forward in every direction - That's just you devolving. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.