> You are not the only one to note that.
>
> Thanks
> Bill
Well, I cant really claim to have come up with the phrase, but after reading
it in the group I like it and it is very, very appropriate to some posts
here.
Bill Hobba - 31 May 2005 00:35 GMT
> > You are not the only one to note that.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> it in the group I like it and it is very, very appropriate to some posts
> here.
Without doubt. And often it is not even worth arguing it with the person -
they will simply claim their gibberish is perfectly coherent. Have a look
at the following with someone called Wesser:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_thread/thread/
3725a87bd17c7b0e/088ab15410622b09#088ab15410622b09
In that post I said:
'I get the distinct feeling you are simply some vacuous Troll who has
nothing better to do with his/her time than post meaningless comments and
see how
people react.'
And what was the outcome? He/she simply changed who they post under and
continued to plague the group. His/her latest incantation is 'a flok of
seagles' and it is obvious his/her purpose is simply to get their jollies by
causing havoc to genuine posters while shifting who they call themselves
frequently enough to avoid people reporting their abusive behavior. He/she
is so sleazy that in their latest incarnation they give their id as
billh011@hot-shot.com in an obvious attempt make others think it is me that
is posting. After long experience with their type (it has classic Troll
written all over it) my advice is simply ignore them or post what you think
of them every now and then. In some cases it may be worthwhile giving a
genuine reply if you think it could help others reading it. But it is
generally a waste of time discussing anything with them.
Thanks
Bill
Llanzlan Klazmon - 31 May 2005 01:02 GMT
>> You are not the only one to note that.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> reading it in the group I like it and it is very, very appropriate to
> some posts here.
Probably a bot in this case.
Klazmon.