Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / June 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Supplement to the paper on Doppler effect

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
None - 29 Jun 2005 20:06 GMT
Dear Colleagues,

Some time ago we published the paper

"On transverse Doppler effect in frames of classical formalism"

http://selftrans.narod.ru/v5_1/contents5rus.html#doppler

As a result of fruitful discussion (unfortunately, not on Google) we
decided to write a supplement. It explains the points which we retained
for the 'homework' of Readers, but it appeared that the inertia of
traditional mind prevented them to understand the meaning of those
points. Read and grasp:

http://selftrans.narod.ru/v5_1/doppler/supp/supp1/supp1.html

It is especially helpful for those who thinks Relativity perfect. ;-)

Sergey B. Karavashkin
Head Laboratory SELF

Olga N. Karavashkina
Assistant/Researcher

187 apt., 38 bldg.
Prospect Gagarina
Kharkov 61140
Ukraine

Phone: +38 (057) 73706624
e-mail: selftrans@yandex.ru , selflab@mail.ru
http://www.angelfire.com/la3/SELFlab/index.html
Uncle Al - 29 Jun 2005 22:34 GMT
> Dear Colleagues,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> http://selftrans.narod.ru/v5_1/contents5rus.html#doppler
[snip]

If it isn't: given any achievable velocities V1 and V2 and any finite
lightspeed, the bound on the relative velocities of V1 and V2 as
viewed by any inertial observer cannot exceed

(V1 + V2)/[1 +(V1)(V2)/c^2]

This is transformation of velocities parallel to the direction of
motion. For velocities at an arbitrary angle theta, Jackson gives

u_parallel = (u'_parallel + v)/(1+(v dot u')/c^2)
u_perp = u'_perp/(gamma_v(1+(v dot u')/c^2))

<http://www.physics.umanitoba.ca/~souther/waves02/feb0402/sld011.htm>

Relativistic doppler shift,
http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-04/2-04.htm
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/reldop2.html
http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~rfield/PHY2061/images/chp39_2.pdf

then you are wrong.  If it is, then you are redundant.

Signature

Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.