Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / July 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Charlotte Church and Closed Time Loops

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel - 14 Jul 2005 11:37 GMT
As I remember, Charlotte Church was 13 for three years running.  But
recently, I heard that she was 22 -- and thus now seemed to be making
normal progress along her world line.

But now I hear she's nineteen!!!  This represents not just a a stasis
or slow-running of her time track, but outright time reversal.

Can this phenomenon be explained by Kurt Goedel's closed time loops?
Will Miss Church never grow any older but be doomed to repeat her youth
over-and-over, and will we be doomed to witness it?

I urge all readers to apply themselves to this problem, in the hope of
finding a happy solution.

The resulting analysis could also be applied, of course, to Peter Pan.
Ben Rudiak-Gould - 14 Jul 2005 13:48 GMT
> Can this phenomenon be explained by Kurt Goedel's closed time loops?

Yes, inasmuch as introducing closed time loops leads to contradictions, and
from a contradiction anything follows.

-- Ben
Autymn D. C. - 15 Jul 2005 13:12 GMT
It does not.  There are two timelines.
Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel - 16 Jul 2005 12:10 GMT
> It does not.  There are two timelines.

Me and my shadow.
Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel - 30 Jul 2005 11:14 GMT
Hmmmmm, this problem is proving trickier than even I thought.  Perhaps
readers should try integrating the 14th differential of the
Fock-Lorentz transformation, rotating their wicks, and dividing by the
number they first thought of.

Bon chance!
Prai Jei - 30 Jul 2005 23:30 GMT
Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel (or somebody else of the same name) wrote
thusly in message <1122718472.119139.37220@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:

> Hmmmmm, this problem is proving trickier than even I thought.  Perhaps
> readers should try integrating the 14th differential of the
> Fock-Lorentz transformation, rotating their wicks, and dividing by the
> number they first thought of.
>
> Bon chance!

Anything to cause CC to vanish up her own
Signature

A couple of questions. How do I stop the wires short-circuiting, and what's
this nylon washer for?

Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.