Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / November 2005

fok yo

this is not what is all about you stooopid, i read maybe more books
than the
entire your foking family and you ever will, fok you again

i told you you were stoopid

i didnt knew you were a selfestablished

ahaha my dick, thank you informinging us

you need to suck his dick you moron, make you comments to the sayings,

send an email if you need spaceman

maybe fok yo, but yo might be a gay, then no thanks

i told you were stoopid, yo don understan sh.t

whay tha fok makin komments at you don understan

showme your computations, give a link to your graphical
representations

let us see your physics and interpretations

Eric Gisse:

 His point is that by assuming nature is wrong and believing everyone
else is stupid, you can save a lot of time and effort developing
a theory that aslo looks cool when implemented in open gl.  It takes
a lot of time and effort to read a book just to decide if the person
who just jumped out that giraud shaded helicopter violates any physics
by falling up into some realistically rendered clouds or whether it's
a bug in the program. By removing the #ifdef DEBUG statements, the
the possibilitiy of a bug is ruled out. After all, 500,000,000
transistors running windows can't be wrong.

 He's not spaceman, but you're close. Mr. S uses a lot of aliases because
he is worried that dirk's fumbles pages would have a negative impact on
his ability to get paid at a rate commensurate with his self- assessment
of what his opinion is worth.

  And give up the satisfaction of having someone appear to be impressed
with a claim that proving 2+2 = 5 is trivial? If barbie doesn't get
wowed, who else will stroke his ego?

[...]

 Picture wiley coyote whining about his failure to persuade the audience
at a road runner convention to run slower and become lunch based on his
acme computer simulation of the physics which shows that it's physically
impossible to outrun a good pair of the latest acme rocket shoes.

 Which is more reasonable: (1) the years of data showing wiley running
into a boulder or over a cliff or (2) a 3-d simulation using hardware
accelerated open gl and the power of microsoft windows? Since he cant
possibly be wrong, his only option is to figure out to pay for an sgi
tezro and recompile to increase the merit of his argument to 30 frames
per second in 48 bit color. You'd be bitter too if you had to spend
$20,000+ for a system that doesn't implement the BlueScreenOfDeath
system call just to argue with people who read books and display their
results in monochrome using a bic pen printer.

yeah, whatever

see, you are the best attempt on a guy doin it for good
tuff implementations simulations and stuff,  you mister
char cBuff[10]; ... cVar = cBuff[10] etc just concluded the
discussion

ahaha AHAHA ahaha

dont be sad, the experts are tha guys havin done all the
possible mistakes in a situation, you are an expert

no, your evt lab exp is nice enuff, but tha lab exp _is_
computerizations
and stuff

long time ago you been in a lab, dont you

open gl is ok, making your plots faster, but you do it in ansi c

ahaha

there is a lot of math and physiscs in quake and similars, actually the

whole quake is math and physics, tha fools cant see it because it is
just behind its surface

you are suppose to know that, you are joking, arnt you?

well, then do a wave guide, a skin effect in a cylinder vacuum inside,
etc
apply propper boundaries, modify the eqns, methods, parameters, put
sr,gr or whatever in them, show the plots, maybe you pass the
examination

5 by seven cant be multiplied

nice to know that you know tha results before you do your calculations

you must be a witch

you are the one  redirecting the replys to alt.troll, stop doin that