 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / November 2005Einstein Beyond Redemption
Both the thermodynamics cult and the relativity cult have contributed considerably to the destruction of human rationality. The former made people repeat endlessly that everything in this world happens because the entropy increases (see Von Neumann's revelation about entropy in http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000313/ ), the latter forced them to admire miracles such as time dilation, length contraction etc. In this sense both cults are criminal. Yet Einstein and his sycophants are unrivalled in their capacity to extract money from the process of destruction: http://www.detnews.com/2005/business/0507/24/D04-256983.htm http://einsteinplag.tripod.com/intro.html http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/wallace.htm One day 20th century will be referred to as the Dark Ages in the history of science. Pentcho Valev >Both the thermodynamics cult and the relativity cult have contributed >considerably to the destruction of human rationality. The former made [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > >Pentcho Valev Sure, any kid knows Einstein just was a math fiddler, he actually needed his math teacher to do the homework for him.... Add some politics, him being Jewish at the right time, why do you think he never came up with ANYTHING after he declared the photon a particle? Trapped in his own trap. The claws that held him was fame and a Nobel. It is all waves, see my posting: 'explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective' in sci.physics some time ago. Now HERE is real place were a mathematician could do some work, but then math as to invent wormholes.. nah, math application to the real world, THAT is what it is for. In the mean time I am overjoyed with this website: http://www.quantummatter.com Look at the picture all the way at the bottom :-) It is time we take the next step, and leave Einstein's illusions behind us, and as humanity come back to sanity. If he (Einstein) had been such a genius, why did he stay Jewish? He would have realized 'god' is inside, a process inside you. Then he would have been at least happy, and not not even wrong with the photon. >>Both the thermodynamics cult and the relativity cult have contributed >>considerably to the destruction of human rationality. The former made [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > Then he would have been at least happy, and not not even wrong with the > photon. "This myth, obviously imitating our planetary system, was shown wrong by quantum theory more than sixty years ago. For example in the hydrogen atom, quantum theory predicts the electron presence as a symmetrical spherical cloud around the proton. Some physicists concluded that the point bits of matter were still there, even though quantum theory contains no notion of point particles. The old myth dies hard!" How the hell does this stupid idiot manage to say that one guy's quantum THEORY is shown to be wrong by another guy's quantum THEORY? You are overjoyed by some vague drivel the clown claims to be shown by "some physicists"? You are very easily pleased. Wit rating: dim Androcles. >>Both the thermodynamics cult and the relativity cult have contributed >>considerably to the destruction of human rationality. The former made [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > his > math teacher to do the homework for him.... Bunkum. At age 15 he had a letter stating his math was already of University caliber. > Add some politics, him being Jewish at the right time, why do you think > he never came up with ANYTHING after he declared the photon a particle? You are obviously ignorant eg GR. Great mathematicians like Hilbert freely sated the physical ideas of GR were entirely due to Einstein. Read Pias - Subtle is the Lord then repost with citations baking up your rubbish. Bill > Trapped in his own trap. The claws that held him was fame and a Nobel. > It is all waves, see my posting: 'explaining the photo electric effect [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > Then he would have been at least happy, and not not even wrong with the > photon. ------------------? >> Sure, any kid knows Einstein just was a math fiddler, he actually needed >> his >> math teacher to do the homework for him.... > >Bunkum. At age 15 he had a letter stating his math was already of >University caliber. 1200$ gets you a PhD, much less a letter, >> Add some politics, him being Jewish at the right time, why do you think >> he never came up with ANYTHING after he declared the photon a particle? > >You are obviously ignorant eg GR. Great mathematicians like Hilbert freely >sated the physical ideas of GR were entirely due to Einstein. You must be kidding right? It is exactly tha tGR has NO physical mechanism. It only strength would be its predictive power. But hell you can do that with a lookup table too. > ------------------? > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >>sated the physical ideas of GR were entirely due to Einstein. > You must be kidding right? Of course not. > It is exactly tha tGR has NO physical mechanism. You are obviously ignorant of very fundamental things. Stating that gravity is space-time curvature is stating a physical mechanism - by which is meant assumption A (gravity is space time curvature) implies B (eg the results of the Pound Rebka experiment, the perihelion of mercury etc). A physical mechanism is not what physicists in the 19th century thought is was ie something working according to a Newtonian mechanical model. > It only strength would be its predictive power. > But hell you can do that with a lookup table too. Learn the basics of science then repost. Bill >> It is exactly tha tGR has NO physical mechanism. > >You are obviously ignorant of very fundamental things. Nope, not of the one that counts here, a physical mechanism. >Stating that gravity >is space-time curvature is stating a physical mechanism Sorry, many people (victims of this education system perhaps), have this type of brain damage. MATH DOES NOT MOVE THE UNIVERSE, MATH IS AN ABSTRACTION IN THE NEURAL NET THAT FORMS THE BRAIN, EVEN A PHYSICAL MODEL, SAME AS A SIMULATION ON A COMPUTER. So that were the caps, I payed for that caps lock key. So- you can claim that space-time- or -oranges- or King Kong (2 caps ) causes gravity, it has no effect on anything (except your credibility, but when we get that close to zero we can use 64 bit integers and be done with 64 zeros). True, I have a problem understanding something. What I cannot understand is that you do not see this. However in a wave model of the particles, we see each particle as an interaction (forgot what the subject line was) with all other matter in the universe (Mach). This makes 100% sense. - by which is meant >assumption A (gravity is space time curvature) implies B (eg the results of >the Pound Rebka experiment, the perihelion of mercury etc). No, the formula matches the result, or the other way around, but you can also do that with a lookup table. It is the same thing as the 'mond' (I think it is called) theory, 'formula fiddling' to get the right result.. no mechanism. Einstein did formula fiddling with GR. He did it again with the photon as particle, then he locked himself out, because photon is no particle in that sense, and his folly was taken over by the education system, hammered into your kids head, and there made equal to 'law of nature'. Never even looking, never even seeing, YOU NEED A MECHANISM else you will always wallow in the illusions of sqrt(1) imaginary worlds. OK if humanity is THAT sort of species, and will stay that way, dinosaurs went where it will go. You have a brain, for Gods sake use it! SNIP > It is all waves, see my posting: 'explaining the photo electric effect from > the wave perspective' in sci.physics some time ago. Nice if it were so simple, but how do you explain Compton collision with a wave? Harald >SNIP > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >Harald ?You mean Compton scattering? if all matter is made of waves (sort of particles are standing waves), then that is also a wave - wave interaction. I am not explaining it, there are many guys here who are VERY good at math. Maybe they should put some energy in that direction, and not into wormholes, time travel, and other useless objects of the imagination. Such as yet an other GR exercise. >>SNIP >> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >time travel, and other useless objects of the imagination. >Such as yet an other GR exercise. Did I forget string theory? I did. > Both the thermodynamics cult and the relativity cult have contributed > considerably to the destruction of human rationality. The former made [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > http://www.detnews.com/2005/business/0507/24/D04-256983.htm > http://einsteinplag.tripod.com/intro.html In the above website we find: In addition to the statement that Poincare sketched the preliminary version of relativity is that he provided a critical part of the whole concept, namely his treatment of local time. Charles Nordman was prompted to say, "They will show that the credit for most of the things which are currently attributed to Einstein is, in reality, due to Poincare." "...in the opinion of the Relativists it is the measuring rods which create space, the clocks which create time. All this was known by Poincare and others long before the time of Einstein, and one does injustice to truth in ascribing the discovery to him. Valev just doesn't get science. He thinks that science is about discoveries. It isn't. Science is about theories which lead to discoveries and at the same time explain the discoveries, unifying then into a concise theory. Discoveries are the threads; the theory is the tapestry. Poincare is to Einstein as Kepler is to Newton. Poincare and Kepler made important discoveries but it was Einstein and Newton who rightfully get the lion's share of credit because they came up with workable theories that accounted for those discoveries. Theories are the central concerns of scientists. Apparently this is not taught to science students. > One day 20th century will be referred to as the Dark Ages in the > history of science. Yes, it is the century that forgot to teach to students what science is really all about. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.