Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / December 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Criminal Science Education in the Era of Postscientism

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Pentcho Valev - 29 Dec 2005 06:43 GMT
In 2001 Jos Uffink published a paper exposing the appalling obscurity
inherent in fundamental scientific concepts:

http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000313/

Since educators would not call Uffink's paper "crank science" (their
usual reaction in analogous cases:
http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0143-0807/26/6/S09/ ), and since the
obscurity in question is taught to freshmen, and since science
education is just dying, one would expect Uffink's paper to be followed
by a series of science education congresses with revolutionary
consequences. Needless to say, no revolution took place. Rather,
Uffink's paper convinced criminal educators that their strategy is the
best one.

Pentcho Valev
Sue... - 29 Dec 2005 08:37 GMT
> In 2001 Jos Uffink published a paper exposing the appalling obscurity
> inherent in fundamental scientific concepts:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Pentcho Valev

Does this prove or disprove relativity :
<< Figure 3: The wave impedance measures the relative
strength of electric and magnetic fields. It is a function of
source structure. >>
http://www.conformity.com/0102reflectionsfig3.gif from:
http://www.conformity.com/0102reflections.html

<<
Time-independent Maxwell equations
Introduction
Coulomb's law
The electric scalar potential
Gauss' law
Poisson's equation
Ampère's experiments
The Lorentz force
Ampère's law
Magnetic monopoles?
Ampère's circuital law
Helmholtz's theorem
The magnetic vector potential
The Biot-Savart law
Electrostatics and magnetostatics

Time-dependent Maxwell's equations
Introduction
Faraday's law
Electric scalar potential?
Gauge transformations
The displacement current
Potential formulation
Electromagnetic waves
Green's functions
Retarded potentials
Advanced potentials?
Retarded fields
Summary                 >>
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/lectures.html

Specifically, what feature is proved or disproved ?
http://www.bartleby.com/173/
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/

Sue...
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0204034
http://web.mit.edu/8.02t/www/802TEAL3D/visualizations/light/index.htm
donstockbauer@hotmail.com - 29 Dec 2005 12:01 GMT
Things are going better than you think, Valev.  Dream up some other
crap to waste computer storage with. Have a nice day.  Go back to sleep.
Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket - 29 Dec 2005 12:15 GMT
My God, not fish and chips again.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.