Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / December 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Eotvos units - pretty pictures

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Joe Fischer - 30 Dec 2005 03:56 GMT
Gravity Gradients

http://www.mines.utah.edu/~wmcemi/appls/grav/

http://www.robertforward.com/Fast_Forward_Fifty_Years.htm
stephen@nomail.com - 30 Dec 2005 06:10 GMT
> Gravity Gradients

> http://www.mines.utah.edu/~wmcemi/appls/grav/

And that alone should convince you that your Divergent
Matter theory is hopelessly wrong.  How can the Earth maintain
its shape if different parts of the Earth's surface are
accelerating outwards at different speeds?

Stephen
Joe Fischer - 30 Dec 2005 07:05 GMT
>> Gravity Gradients
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>accelerating outwards at different speeds?
>Stephen

       First, (in the model)  the outward velocity of
the surface is so great (and a constant), the
acceleration is very small.
       The fact that the peak acceleration of
gravity is 1700 miles below the surface should
have been enough, but this is a model, and
it is what I do.  

        Actually, I am very interested in the
gradiometers, I don't have a clue how they
work (I can read the Forward patent, but
I may still not understand, I am a slow
learner).

        The fact that the model does not
need force at a distance, requires that
freefall be inertial motion, and readings
of accelerometers are rational with the
model, all this makes the model totally
irresistible to me.
       Einstein was excited over just the
freefall inertial motion, so I am extremely
impressed with the beauty of such a
major reduction in complexity in the
workings of nature.

       I don't even know what I would be
doing if I did not have the model to play
with.

Joe Fischer
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.