 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / January 2006FPS, CGS, MKS. ....NOW it's MKW
For navigational convenience, a new system of units is about to be introduced to physics. It will be known as the MKW system..... METRE, KILOGRAM, WILSON. ONE 'WILSON' is defined as the absolute time taken for a GPS clock to make one complete orbit. Thus: 1 day = 2 Wilsons. 43200 seconds = 1 Wilson. 1 LightWilson = 12947040000000 metres The reason for this great scientific advance is that GPS clocks can be more easily synched with both the other orbiting clocks and the ground clocks simply by counting the number of ticks they emit per Wilson. HW. www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm > For navigational convenience, a new system of units is about to be > introduced [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > ONE 'WILSON' is defined as the absolute time You wouldn't be trying to sneak in logically unsound definitions would you Henri? Since absolute time does not exist your definition is a crock. Bill > taken for a GPS clock to make one > complete orbit. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > HW. > www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm >> For navigational convenience, a new system of units is about to be >> introduced [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >You wouldn't be trying to sneak in logically unsound definitions would you >Henri? Since absolute time does not exist your definition is a crock. The period of any oscillator represents an interval of absolute time. The problen is to maintain a constant oscillation. GPS orbit are set very accurately...so they are the logical candidate for the universal time standard unit, the 'Wilson'. >Bill > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >> HW. >> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm HW. www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm > For navigational convenience, a new system of units is about to be introduced > to physics. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > easily synched with both the other orbiting clocks and the ground clocks simply > by counting the number of ticks they emit per Wilson. What happened to the three dimensions of time, Henri? > HW. > www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm >> For navigational convenience, a new system of units is about to be introduced >> to physics. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > >What happened to the three dimensions of time, Henri? They are all expressed in Wilsons, pup. Didn't you know that the width, height and depth of a hill can all be expressed in the same unit, eg. metres. HW. www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm > >> For navigational convenience, a new system of units is about to be introduced > >> to physics. [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > Didn't you know that the width, height and depth of a hill can all be expressed > in the same unit, eg. metres. Now that I have your attention, why don't you explain to me why you feel you can accomplish by spreading your "discoveries" on USENET? > HW. > www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm In sci.physics.relativity, Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote on 27 Jan 2006 22:36:47 -0800 <1138430207.346574.178100@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>: >> >> For navigational convenience, a new system of units is about >> >> to be introduced to physics. [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > Now that I have your attention, why don't you explain to me why you > feel you can accomplish by spreading your "discoveries" on USENET? We're the first step in his Grand Mission, of course. If he can convince us of the viability of his theories, he can convince anyone in a proper peer review group. :-) At least, such is my theory, anyway. Too bad he's got to go through Hexenmeister first... :-) [.sigsnip]  Signature#191, ewill3@earthlink.net It's still legal to go .sigless. > In sci.physics.relativity, Eric Gisse > <jowr.pi@gmail.com> [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > At least, such is my theory, anyway. Too bad he's got to go > through Hexenmeister first... :-) The irresistable force meets the immovable object even though the immovable object could be left alone. > [.sigsnip] >In sci.physics.relativity, Eric Gisse ><jowr.pi@gmail.com> [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] >convince us of the viability of his theories, he can convince >anyone in a proper peer review group. :-) Thank you Ghost. It is always a good idea to get opinions about a theory before publishing, even if most criticism comes from complete idiots like geesey. >At least, such is my theory, anyway. Too bad he's got to go >through Hexenmeister first... :-) Androcles has topped up his veins with 'anti-freeze' for the winter. Maybe he will return to sanity when springtime arrives. >[.sigsnip] HW. www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm > >In sci.physics.relativity, Eric Gisse > ><jowr.pi@gmail.com> [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > It is always a good idea to get opinions about a theory before publishing, even > if most criticism comes from complete idiots like geesey. You have our opinions. The closest thing you have as to "supporters" think you are an idiot. The only thing you and Androcles can agree on is that SR is sh.t, you can't even agree on how it is sh.t - just that it is. When are you going to act upon them and flush your theories down the toilet? > >At least, such is my theory, anyway. Too bad he's got to go > >through Hexenmeister first... :-) [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > HW. > www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm >> >In sci.physics.relativity, Eric Gisse >> ><jowr.pi@gmail.com> [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] >> Androcles has topped up his veins with 'anti-freeze' for the winter. >> Maybe he will return to sanity when springtime arrives. poor clueless boy >> >[.sigsnip] >> >> HW. >> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm HW. www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm > >> >In sci.physics.relativity, Eric Gisse > >> ><jowr.pi@gmail.com> [quoted text clipped - 53 lines] > > poor clueless boy More or less clueless than you? You think you have a theory that will revolutionize physics, yet you keep it to yourself except for flooding this newsgroup with its' predictions. Why? > >> >[.sigsnip] > >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > HW. > www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm >> >> >At least, such is my theory, anyway. Too bad he's got to go >> >> >through Hexenmeister first... :-) [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > >Why? woof-woof! >> HW. >> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm HW. www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm > >> >> >At least, such is my theory, anyway. Too bad he's got to go > >> >> >through Hexenmeister first... :-) [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > woof-woof! Does the reality of your situation frighten you that much that you can't even give me a reply that would sound like it came from an adult rather than a child? > >> HW. > >> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm > > HW. > www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm >> >You think you have a theory that will revolutionize physics, yet you >> >keep it to yourself except for flooding this newsgroup with its' [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >can't even give me a reply that would sound like it came from an adult >rather than a child? Geesey boy, if you ever say anything scientific and constructive, I will be only too pleased to answer you. Now be a good pup and hop in your kennel.... >> >> HW. >> >> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm >> >> HW. >> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm HW. www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm > >> >You think you have a theory that will revolutionize physics, yet you > >> >keep it to yourself except for flooding this newsgroup with its' [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Geesey boy, if you ever say anything scientific and constructive, I will be > only too pleased to answer you. All I want to know is how you feel posting on USENET will help you since you routinely shun the opinion of anyone who disagrees with you. > Now be a good pup and hop in your kennel.... > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > HW. > www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm >> Geesey boy, if you ever say anything scientific and constructive, I will be >> only too pleased to answer you. > >All I want to know is how you feel posting on USENET will help you >since you routinely shun the opinion of anyone who disagrees with you. Geesey, chimpanzees can give opinions. I am only interested in constructive scientific discussion with fellow scientists. That doesn't include you. HW. www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm > >> Geesey boy, if you ever say anything scientific and constructive, I will be > >> only too pleased to answer you. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Geesey, chimpanzees can give opinions. I am only interested in constructive > scientific discussion with fellow scientists. That doesn't include you. ...and who might these fabled "fellow scientists" be? NOT: Anyone who accepts the experimental standing of special relativity. That excludes everyone but yourself, Androcles, Jim Greenfield, Spaceman, and Ken Seto. Androcles thinks you are an idiot. That leaves him out. Jim Greenfield, Spaceshit, and Androcles are incapable of doing highschool algebra. I don't know who would actually want their opinion. That leaves Ken Seto and yourself. Did I miss anyone? > HW. > www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm In sci.physics.relativity, Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote on 30 Jan 2006 17:58:27 -0800 <1138672707.683455.181770@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>: >> >> Geesey boy, if you ever say anything scientific and constructive, >> >> I will be only too pleased to answer you. [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > Did I miss anyone? Hammond, maybe? :-) [.sigsnip] Signature#191, ewill3@earthlink.net It's still legal to go .sigless. > In sci.physics.relativity, Eric Gisse > <jowr.pi@gmail.com> [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > Hammond, maybe? :-) [Hammond], you mean. Anyway, even Captain SPOG is fully in the relativity camp. He isn't as nutty when you ask him about it, which surprised the hell out of me. > [.sigsnip] In sci.physics.relativity, HW@..(Henri Wilson) <HW@> wrote on Fri, 27 Jan 2006 22:34:07 GMT <g37lt1t79lq4q6v9th0krukvfd0ejlsaaq@4ax.com>: > For navigational convenience, a new system of units is about > to be introduced to physics. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > ONE 'WILSON' is defined as the absolute time taken for a GPS > clock to make one complete orbit. Dumb question: what is the height of said orbit, and does the planetary mass matter? Standard orbital velocity is sqrt(g * r) = sqrt(G * M / r), where G is the universal grav constant, M is the planet mass, and r is the orbit radius. Since the circumference is 2 * pi * r, the orbital period is of course 2 * pi * r / sqrt(G * M / r) = 2 * pi * G^(-1/2) * r^(3/2) * M^(-1/2). [rest snipped] Signature#191, ewill3@earthlink.net It's still legal to go .sigless. >In sci.physics.relativity, HW@..(Henri Wilson) ><HW@> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >the orbital period is of course 2 * pi * r / sqrt(G * M / r) >= 2 * pi * G^(-1/2) * r^(3/2) * M^(-1/2). Ghost, you gone overboard again... GPS orbits are very accurate. You can set your watch or egg-timer by them. >[rest snipped] HW. www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm In sci.physics.relativity, HW@..(Henri Wilson) <HW@> wrote on Sat, 28 Jan 2006 05:44:01 GMT <av0mt150sterve33bq1bhk49l63u8blt94@4ax.com>: >>In sci.physics.relativity, HW@..(Henri Wilson) >><HW@> [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > GPS orbits are very accurate. > You can set your watch or egg-timer by them. I wouldn't be so sure of that. One interesting result scooped Gravity Probe B, for example, by measuring the distortion of the orbits of certain satellites. In any event GPS ephemera are routinely published, and presumably the satellites themselves are equipped with thrusters, to combat the effects of the atmosphere and the solar wind. [rest snipped] Signature#191, ewill3@earthlink.net It's still legal to go .sigless. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.