 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / May 2006Kooks conference
Check this out, fresh from 2006, the "who's who" of kookery: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/Deneb/2006NPAAbstracts32206.htm > Check this out, fresh from 2006, the "who's who" of kookery: > > http://mywebpages.comcast.net/Deneb/2006NPAAbstracts32206.htm Wow - apparently even the AAAS is on their side. ;-)) > Check this out, fresh from 2006, the "who's who" of kookery: > > http://mywebpages.comcast.net/Deneb/2006NPAAbstracts32206.htm I'm a member of the Natural Philosophy Alliance and have attended about six meetings in the past ten years. Can't say that I've met too many NPA'ers who were much kookier or crankier than several contributors to this usegroup. If you want to think about "kooky" think of P.A.M. Dirac (1938?) with his "negative mass" antiparticles. (I think he got pardoned..) Or think of Wheeler and Feynman with their 1947 absorber theory wherein stars could tell, years in advance, when you were going to be looking, so they could shine their kind light in your direction. (That's probably not said exactly right, but their absorber theory, like Maxwell-Lorentz, called on future events to affect processes in the present [advanced potentials, for example]). Bob Fritzius > > Check this out, fresh from 2006, the "who's who" of kookery: > > > > http://mywebpages.comcast.net/Deneb/2006NPAAbstracts32206.htm > > I'm a member of the Natural Philosophy Alliance Please note that over here we call this thing the Natural Psychopathy Alliance Try to get at least your facts right. Dirk Vdm fritzius@bellsouth.net: >> Check this out, fresh from 2006, the "who's who" of kookery: >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >many NPA'ers who were much kookier or crankier than several >contributors to this usegroup. You also don't know much about physics, so you have no basis for comparison. >If you want to think about "kooky" think of P.A.M. Dirac (1938?) with >his "negative mass" antiparticles. (I think he got pardoned..) Or think And which part of the dirac theory has failed to e experimentally confirmed? >of Wheeler and Feynman with their 1947 absorber theory wherein >stars could tell, years in advance, when you were going to be looking, [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >Bob Fritzius |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.