Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / May 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Maxwell's vs. Einstein's field equations

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Sue... - 31 May 2006 12:09 GMT
Albert Einstein's stated and demonstrated goal was the
formulation of field equations along the same lines as
Maxwell's but with more generality than Maxwell's with
the hope of including the force of gravity and inertia.

Did he succeed ?
In demonstrating that gravity and inerta are related
to electrical and magnetic effects and are subject
to the same delays and laws of conservation. The
prediction, in the Lorenz gauge, of gravity's effict on
nuclear resonance (Pound-Snider, GPS presets )
seems a quantitavive success, even if the sign is reversed.

In demonstrating a qualitative mechanism on par
with that of Maxwell's equations for light? If Tajmar
and de Matos is repeated and GP-B doesn't frame-drag,
then we'll have to conclude Einstein overlooked a
plausible mechanism, known in his career. (London, Casimir)
That would come as no surprise, as he overlooked the mechanism
of observer dependent light speed, preferring a mathematical
absurdity to leaving an open question. (P. Langevin)

Sue...
Sue... - 31 May 2006 19:25 GMT
> Albert Einstein's stated and demonstrated goal was the
> formulation of field equations along the same lines as
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Sue...

<<Recent experimental results on the gravitomagnetic London
moment tend to demonstrate that gravitational dipolar type radiation
associated with the Einstein-Maxwell equations is real. This implies
that Maxwellian gravity is not only an approximation to the complete
theory, but may indeed reveal a new aspect of gravitational
phenomena associated with a vectorial spin 1 gravitational
boson, which we might call the graviphoton. As an
example, a fully relativistic modified theory of gravity
called scalar vector tensor gravity  would duly take into account
this new side of gravity. In the following we will
therefore use the term graviphoton for studying the Proca type
character of gravity and its consequences on coherent matter.
The field equations for massive linearized gravity are given by11:

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0603032
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.