> I forgot my chemistry:
>
> I found: H2O + energy = 2H2 + O2
>
> 1. I believe the H2 in H2O are two electrons of hydrogen, correct?
No, two atoms. H2O contains two hydrogen nuclei (protons)
and one oxygen nucleus.
> 2. Where did they get the four protons of hydrogen to produce: 2 H2 ?
>From two water molecules. The balanced equation is:
2H2O -> 2H2 + O2
> 3. shouldn't the equation be......... 2H2O + energy = 2H2 + O2? (and
> not H2O)?
Yes. And it is. See here for instance:
http://www.teachers.ash.org.au/jfuller/chemistry/chem7.htm
- Randy
guskz@hotmail.com - 25 Jun 2006 10:27 GMT
> > I forgot my chemistry:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> No, two atoms. H2O contains two hydrogen nuclei (protons)
> and one oxygen nucleus.
oops, hey it's been over 20 years since I even looked at a chemical
equation.
I presume it takes more energy to form H2O then to seperate
H2O?.....because H2 is a 1st atomic shell interaction where as H2O is
at a higher valence interaction?
---------------------------------------------------
Why do these equations in demand energy where as burning wood releases
energy (both are chemical reactions)?
I guess fire is over excited hydrogen atoms?
> > 2. Where did they get the four protons of hydrogen to produce: 2 H2 ?
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> - Randy
guskz@hotmail.com, stupid adolescent twerp:
>I forgot my chemistry:
You forgot your brain.
>I found: H2O + energy = 2H2 + O2
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>3. shouldn't the equation be......... 2H2O + energy = 2H2 + O2? (and
>not H2O)?
guskz@hotmail.com - 25 Jun 2006 10:11 GMT
> guskz@hotmail.com, stupid adolescent twerp:
> >
> >I forgot my chemistry:
>
> You forgot your brain.
this time i agree
> >
> >I found: H2O + energy = 2H2 + O2
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> >not H2O)?
> >