Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / July 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
isaacinspace@gmail.com - 23 Jul 2006 21:27 GMT
Hello, I am an ignorant layman with only rudimentary knowledge of math
and physics. I read about things like the Unified Field Theory, Theory
of Everything, etc, which I understand have not been developed yet, but
I am wondering if there exists a theory or mathematical formula that
could be seen as "explaining" or "defining" physics, the universe,
earth, or anything macrocosmic like that?
This is for artistic purposes--I'm trying to find some kind of formula
that can be expressed concisely and somewhat visually, ie, E=MC2, which
could be seen as somehow defining reality, or "the meaning of life", so
to speak. It will be used in a painting, alongside other
reality-defining things like religious texts and so on.

Any ideas on this would be much appreciated. Thanks.

-Isaac
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) - 24 Jul 2006 00:34 GMT
Dear isaacinspace:

> Hello, I am an ignorant layman with only rudimentary
> knowledge of math and physics. I read about things
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> "explaining" or "defining" physics, the universe,
> earth, or anything macrocosmic like that?

No.  Science doesn't have access to explanations, or much in the
way of definitions that it didn't make up on its own.  It
connects the next moment with this moment via the application of
logic.

> This is for artistic purposes--I'm trying to find
> some kind of formula that can be expressed
> concisely and somewhat visually, ie, E=MC2,
> which could be seen as somehow defining
> reality, or "the meaning of life", so to speak.

Look in the mirror.  Paint what you see.  Not the meat, what
animates it.  That is the meaning of life.

> It will be used in a painting, alongside other
> reality-defining things like religious texts and
> so on.
>
> Any ideas on this would be much appreciated.
> Thanks.

Don't look outside yourself for answers to questions like this.
All you will get "out here" is hypnosis and snake oil.

David A. Smith
visual word - 24 Jul 2006 11:32 GMT
our brain is a worm in a time warp that plucks a string when we sing
your peer
electrostatic disharge created with in a chemical fire within the
bounds of the brain
(The neurotransmitters found in the brain consist primarily of
small-molecule transmitters (a class of about ten molecules),
and fifty neuroactive peptides) these consist of 20
amino acids of which occur in living things. let me get straight
these medications that accur naturaly in the brain and are fed by
these 20 amino acids found by foods coupled with electricity the
food that feeds the brain is a pear. in this pear is contained all of
the essential electrolytes that the brain needs to go about its'
natural course of time. in the second demension or demensia being
singular as in a singularity. now let be get even more straight and to
the point: our brain is the worm in a time warp. Tryptophan is an amino
acid one of which is used in the brain and is a chemical fire that can
not be squelched or quenced or put out with water and must keep on
burning forever and ever. the amino acids in the brain consist of the
physical elements found in a pear. honey being a crystaline structure
and milk thus having all of the protein based acids for any type of
body either a monkey or an ape or a horse or a dog, a lion a tiger a
bear a goat a sheep or an elephant of any type size, shape, breed,
creed, or area, place or location. they are for ants, and anything on
the land that ever was and ever is then if an individual only drinks
milk which is the opposite of a laxative and mix it together with
actual physical honey which is a laxative then they cancel one another
out of all equations
and allow the creations
of this marvelous human
anatomy to function at its' proper course in time. 1+1=1 x ininiti if
an apple drops from a tree and forms another tree how many trees does
anybody have? it's simple the universe at one time in space had a cloud

that had only acids and could not be put out
without light
O (oxygen) + light = 3 colors red yellow and blue then each color is
continualy being split upon each amino acid or chemical the first one
being hydrogen to form life as one comprehends it to be. if one desires
to create life not
artificialy then do what the i did i as in life
A

Acacia Gum
Acetic Acid, glacial
Acetone
Acetonitrile
Acid Spill Control Products
Acitivated Carbon
Alcohol, Anhydrous
Alum
Alum, Ammonium
Alum, Chromium
Alum, Iron
Alum Potassium
Aluminum, Powder
Aluminum, Shot
Aluminum Acetate
Aluminum Ammonium Sulfate
Aluminum Chloride, 6 Hydrate USP
Aluminum Nitrate 9 Hyd crystal
Aluminum Nitrate 60% Solution
Aluminum Oxide, Basic
Aluminum Potassium Sulfate
Aluminum Sulfate
Aminoacetic Acid
Aminobenzene (Aniline)
Aminobenzoic Acid-p (Sulfanilic)
Aminoethanoic Acid (Glycine)
Aminosulfamic Acid(Sulfamic Acid)
Ammonia Solution
Ammonium Acetate crystal
Ammonium Acetate 65% solution
Ammonium Alum
Ammonium Bicarbonate
Ammonium Bichromate
Ammonium Bifluoride
Ammonium Bromide
Ammonium Carbonate
Ammonium Chloride
Ammonium Citrate Dibasic Purified
Ammonium Dichromate
Ammonium Dihydrogen Phosphate
Ammonium Ferric Citrate
Ammonium Ferric Sulfate
Ammonium Fluoborate
Ammonium Fluoride
Ammonium Formate 50% solution
Ammonium Heptamolybdate
Ammonium Hydrogen Sulphite
Ammonium Hydroxide
Ammonium Iodide
Ammonium Iron Citrate
Ammonium Iron(II)Sulfate
Ammonium Iron(III)Sulfate
Ammonium Metavanadate
Ammonium Molybdate 4 Hydrate
Ammonium Monohydrogen Citrate
Ammonium Monohydrogen Phosphate
Ammonium Nitrate Reagent ACS
Ammonium Oxalate
Ammonium Persulfate
Ammonium Phosphate, Dibasic
Ammonium Phosphate, Monobasic
Ammonium Sodium Phosphate
Ammonium Sulfate
Ammonium Thiocyanate
Amyl Acetate
Amyl Alcohol-normal
Amyl Alcohol-iso
Amyl Alcohol-tertiary
Antimony Oxide
Antimony Potassium Tartrate
Antimony Trichloride
Antimony Trioxide
Arginine Monohydrochloride-L(+)
Arsenic, 1000ppm Spectral Standard
Arsenic Pentoxide
Ascorbic Acid
Ascorbic Acid-L(+)
Asparagine Monohydrate-L(+)
Aspartic Acid-DL
Aspirin
Atomic Absorption Standards

B
Barium Acetate
Barium Carbonate
Barium Chlorate
Barium Chloride
Barium Chromate
Barium Dioxide
Barium Hydroxide
Barium Nitrate
Barium Sulfate
Bentonite Clay
Benzaldehyde
Benzocaine
Benzoic Acid USP
Benzyl Alcohol
Biotin,-D
Bismuth, metal
Bismuth Nitrate
Bismuth Subcarbonate
Bismuth Subgallate
Bismuth Subsalicylate
Bismuth Trichloride
Bismuth Trioxide
Borax, anhydrous
Borax, Decahydrate(10 mole)
Borax, Pentahydrate(5 mole)
Boric Acid
Boric Anhydride
Bromine
Buffer Concentrates(DILUT-IT)
Buffer solutions, pH 4,7,10
Butanediol,-1,4
Butanol,-1
Butanol,-2
Butanol, iso
Butanol, tertiary
Butoxyethanol,-2
Butoxyethyl Acetate,-2
Butyl Acetate,normal
Butyl Acetate, iso
Butyl Alcohol, normal
Butyl Alcohol, iso
Butyl Alcohol, tertiary
Butylamine,-N
Butyl Amine,-secondary
Butyl Carbitol
Butyl Cellosolve
Butyl Cellosolve Acetate
Butyl Diglycol
Butyl Ether
Butyl Glycol
Butylated Hydroxy Toluene (BHT)
Butyl Paraben
Butyl Phosphate, Tri
Butyl Phthalate, Di

C
Cadmium Acetate
Cadmium Carbonate
Cadmium Chloride, Hydrate
Cadmium Chloride, Anhydrous
Cadmium Iodide
Cadmium Nitrate
Cadmium Oxide
Cadmium Sulfate, Hydrate
Cadmium Sulfate, Anhydrous
Caffeine, Anhydrous
Calcium Acetate
Calcium Carbide
Calcium Carbonate Heavy Powder
Calcium Carbonate Light Powder
Calcium Chloride, Dihydrate USP
Calcium Citrate
Calcium Chloride, Anhydrous
Calcium Chloride Solution
Calcium Fluoride
Calcium Gluconate
Calcium Hydroxide USP
Calcium Hypochlorite 65%
Calcium Lactate
Calcium Nitrate granular extra pure
Calcium Nitrate Solution
Calcium Oxide
Calcium Phosphate, Dibasic
Calcium Phosphate, Monobasic
Calcium Phosphate, Tribasic
Calcium Sulfate, hydrated
Calcium Sulphate, Anhydrous
Camphor, DL
Carbitol Solvent
Carbolic Acid
Carbon Activated Powder
Carbowax
Castor Oil
Caustic Potash
Caustic Potash 45% Liquid
Caustic Soda
Caustic Soda 50% Liquid
Cellosolve Acetate
Cellosolve Solvent
Charcoal, Activated
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Choline Chloride
Chrome Alum
Chromic Acid
Chromium Chloride Pure
Chromium Nitrate, 9-Hydrate
Chromium Nitrate 50% Solution
Chromium Oxide
Chromium Potassium Sulfate
Chromium Sulfate
Chromium Trioxide
Citric Acid, Anhydrous
Citric Acid, Monohydrate
Cobalt Acetate (23% Co)
Cobalt Carbonate (45% Co)
Cobalt Chloride 6-Hydrate (25% Co)
Cobalt Hydrate
Cobalt Nitrate 6-Hydrate (20% Co)
Cobalt Sulfate 7-Hydrate (21% Co)
Cobalt Sulfate Monohydrate (33% Co)
Collodion
Copper, metal
Copper Acetate
Copper Bromide
Copper Carbonate
Copper Chloride
Copper Fluoborate
Copper Gluconate
Copper Nitrate
Copper Oxide
Copper Sulfate
Cupric salts- see "copper"
Cuprous Chloride
Cuprous Cyanide
Cuprous Oxide, black
Cuprous Oxide red
Creatine, monohydrate
Cresol
Cyclohexane
Cyclohexanol
Cyclohexanone
Cyclohexylamine
Cystine,-L
Cystine Monohydrochloride,-L
Cystine Monohydrochloride, Anhydrous,-L

D
Dextrose, Hydrous
Dextrose, Anhydrous
DiAcetone Alcohol
Diatomaceous Earth
Dibutyl Phthalate
Dichloroethane,- 1,2
Dichloromethane, -1,2
Diethyl Ether (Ether)
Diethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether
Diethyl Phthalate
Diethylamine
Diethylene Glycol
Di-iodomethane
Dimethylformamide
Dimethylglyoxime
Dimethyl Paratoluidine, N,N
Dimethyl Sulphoxide (DMSO)
Dimethyl Phthalate
Dimethyl Sulfate
Dioctyl Phthalate
Disodium Edetate (DiSodium EDTA)
Disodium Hydrogen Phosphate
Drierite
Dual Tint Universal pH Papers

E
EDTA
EDTA, Disodium USP
EDTA, Trisodium
EDTA, Tetrasodium
EDTA, Calcium derivative
EDTA, Magnesium derivative
Epichlorohydrin
Epsom Salts
Erythorbic Acid
Erythorbic Acid, Sodium salt
Ether, Reagent
Ether, Anhydrous Reagent
Ether, Petroleum 35-60°C
Ethoxy Triglycol
Ethyl Acetate
Ethyl p-Aminobenzoate (Benzocaine)
Ethylene Dichloride
Ethylene Glycol
Ethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether
Ethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether
Ethylene Glycol MonoMethyl Ether
Ethyl Diglycol pure
Ethyl Ether
Ethanol, denatured

F
Ferric Ammonium Citrate
Ferric Ammonium EDTA
Ferric Ammonium Oxalate
Ferric Ammonium Sulfate
Ferric Chloride 75% Solution
Ferric Citrate
Ferric Nitrate
Ferric Oxide
Ferric Subsulfate
Ferric Sulfate
Ferrous Ammonium Sulfate
Ferrous Gluconate
Ferrous Sulfate
Flammable Solvent Spill Clean-Up Kit
Formaldehyde 37% Solution
Formalin
Formamide
Formic Acid 85%
Formic Acid 90%-95%
Fructose

G
Gallic Acid Monohydrate
Gelatin
Gluconic Acid 50% Solution
Glutamic Acid,-L, base
Glutamic Acid,-D
Glutamine, l-(+)
Glycerin (Glycerol)
Glycine
Glycogen
Glycol Ether DPM
Glycol Ether PM
Glycol Ether TPM
Glycolic Acid (65-70%)
Guanidine Hydrochloride
Gum Acacia (Gum Arabic)

H
HEPES
HEPES, Sodium salt
Heptane, normal
Hexane
Hexanes
Hexanone,-2
Hexylene Glycol
Histidine,-L(+)
Hydrated Aluminum Silicate (Kaolin)
Hydrated Lime
Hydrobromic Acid 47-49%
Hydrochloric Acid
Hydrochloric Acid Standard Solutions
Hydrofluoric Acid 49-50%
Hydrofluoric Acid Hot Dip 10:1
Hydrogen Peroxide 30%
Hydrogen Peroxide 35%
Hydrogen Peroxide 50%
Hydroquinone
Hydroxyacetic Acid
Hydroxyl Ammonium Sulfate
Hydroxylamine Hydrochloride
Hydroxylamine Sulfate

I/J/K
Iodic Acid
Iodine
Iodine, Resublimed
Iodine Standard Solutions
Iodoform
Iodoethane
Iodomethane
Iron, metal
Iron, Reduced
Iron Chloride
Iron (II) Sulfate 7-hydrate
Iron, EDTA
L-Isoleucine
Isophorone
Isopropyl Alcohol
Kaolin
Kerosene, deodorized

L
Lactic Acid 85% (L+)
Lactic Acid 85% (DL)
Lactose
Lanthanum Chloride
Lanthanum Nitrate
Lanthanum Oxide
Lead, metal
Lead Acetate
Lead Chloride
Lead Chromate
Lead Dioxide
Lead Nitrate
Lead Oxide
Lead Sub-Acetate
Lead Sulfate
Leucine,-L
Lidocaine Hydrochloride
Limonene,-D
Lithium Carbonate
Lithium Chloride crystal
Lithium Chloride 36% Brine
Lithium Hydroxide
Lithium Hypochlorite
Lithium Nitrate
Lithium Perchlorate
Lithium Sulfate, monohydrate
Lithium Sulfate, Anhydrous
Lithium Tetraborate
Litmus Paper
Lysine,-L Hydrochloride

M
Magnesium, metal
Magnesium Acetate, 4-hydrate
Magnesium Carbonate
Magnesium Chloride, 6-hydrate USP
Magnesium Chloride, 6-hydrate Food Grade
Magnesium Hydroxide Carbonate Light Powder
Magnesium Hydroxide Heavy Powder USP
Magnesium Nitrate, 6-hydrate
Magnesium Nitrate Solution
Magnesium Oxide USP
Magnesium Phosphate Dibasic
Magnesium Stearate
Magnesium Sulfate 7-hydrate
Magnesium Sulfate dried powder
Magnesium Sulfate Anhydrous USP
Malic Acid, DL
Malonic Acid
Manganese Dioxide
Manganous Carbonate (Manganese Carbonate)
Manganous Chloride,4-hydrate
Manganous Nitrate 50% Solution
Manganous Sulfate, Monohydrate
Mannitol
MEK
Menthol,-L
Mercuric Acetate
Mercuric Bromide
Mercuric Chloride
Mercuric Iodide
Mercuric Nitrate, Monohydrate
Mercuric Oxide
Mercuric Sulfate
Mercurous Chloride
Mercurous Nitrate, 2-hydrate
Mercury, triple distilled
Mercury Spill Clean Up Kit
Methanol
Methyl Alcohol
Methionine,-DL
Methoxyethanol,-2
Methyl Benzoate
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether
Methyl iso-Butyl Ketone
Methyl Cellosolve
Methyl Glycol
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Iodide
Methyl iso-Butyl Ketone
Methyl Orange, Sodium salt
Methyl Paraben
Methyl Pyrrolidinone
Methyl Red Hydrochloride
Methyl Red, sodium salt
Methyl Salicylate
Methylene Blue
Methylene Chloride
Metso
Mineral Oil
Mineral Spirits
Molecular Sieves,activated
Molybdic Acid 85%
Monoethanolamine
Morpholine
Murexide
Muriatic Acid

N/O
Naptha, VM&P
Naphol Spirits
Neutrasol (Trademark JT Baker Chemical)
Neutrasorb (Trademark JT Baker Chemical)
Niacinamide
Nickel, shot
Nickel(ous) Acetate, 4-hydrate
Nickel(ous) Carbonate, "X"-hydrate
Nickel(ous) Chloride, 6-hydrate
Nickel(ous) Nitrate, 6-hydrate
Nickel(ous) Sulfate, 6-hydrate
Nicotinic Acid (Niacin)
Ninhydrin, Monohydrate
Nitric Acid 69-70%
Nitric Acid, Standard Reagent solutions
Octane
Oleic Acid
Oxalic Acid, 2-hydrate

P
Pan
Pancreatin
Paraffin Oil
Paraffin Wax
Paraformaldehyde
Pentane
Pentane,-iso
Pentanol (Amyl Alcohol mixed isomers)
Perchloric Acid 60%
Perchloric Acid 70%
Perchloroethylene (Tetrachlorethylene)
Periodic Acid
Petroleum Ether 20 - 40 C
Petroleum Ether 30 - 60 C
Petroleum Ether 35 - 60 C
Petroleum Ether 30 - 75 C
Petroleum Ether 50 - 110 C
pH Indicating Papers
Phenol, Liquified
Phenolphthalein USP
Phenol Red
Phenol Red, Sodium salt
Phenylacetic Acid
Phosphomolybdic Acid, 'X'-hydrate
Phosphoric Acid 85%
Phosphorous Pentachloride
Phosphorous Pentoxide
Phosphotungstic Acid, 'n'-hydrate
Phthalic Anhydride
Polyethylene Glycol Liquids
Polyethylene Glycol Waxes
Polysorbate(Tween)
Polyvinylpyrrolidone
Potash
Potassium Acetate
Potassium Acid Carbonate
Potassium Bicarbonate
Potassium Bifluoride
Potassium Biphthalate
Potassium Bisulfate
Potassium Bisulfite,-meta
Potassium Bitartrate
Potassium Bromate
Potassium Bromide
Potassium Carbonate, 1.5 hydrate
Potassium Carbonate, Anhydrous
Potassium Chlorate
Potassium Chloride USP
Potassium Chromate
Potassium Chromium Sulfate
Potassium Citrate, Monohydrate
Potassium Dichromate
Potassium Ferricyanide
Potassium Ferrocyanide, 3-hydrate
Potassium Fluoride
Potassium Hydrogen Carbonate
Potassium Hydroxide
Potassium Hydroxide 45% Liquid
Potassium Hydroxide Standard Solutions
Potassium Iodate
Potassium Iodide
Potassium Metabisulfite
Potassium Nitrate
Potassium Nitrite
Potassium Oxalate, Monohydrate
Potassium Perchlorate
Potassium Persulfate
Potassium Phosphate Dibasic Anhydrous
Potassium Phosphate Monobasic
Potassium Phosphate Tribasic, -'n' hydrate
Potassium Pyrosulfate
Potassium Sodium Tartrate, 4-hydrate
Potassium Sorbate
Potassium Sulfamate
Potassium Sulfate
Potassium Sulfite 45% Liquid
Potassium Tartrate, 1/2-hydrate
Potassium Thiocyanate
Procaine Hydrochloride USP (not sterlized)
L-Proline
Propanol,-1
Propanol,-2
Propionic Acid, Sodium salt
Propyl Acetate, normal
Propyl Alcohol, Iso
Propyl Paraben
Propylene Glycol
Propylene Glycol Mono Methyl Ether
PRS-1000 Photo Resist
PRS-2000 Photo Resist
Pyridine
Pyrogallic Acid
Pyrogallol

Q/R
Quinine Sulfate
Riboflavin
Rochelle Salts
Rose Bengal

S
Saccharin, (Soluble) Sodium
Salicylaldehyde
Salicylic Acid
Salicylic Acid, Sodium salt
Salt
Salt Peter
L-Serine
Silica Gel
Silica Gel, Desiccant
Silica Gel, Chromatographic
Silver Acetate
Silver Nitrate
Silver Nitrate Standard Solution
Soda Ash
Soda Lime
Sodium, metal
Sodium Bisulfite
Sodium metaBisulfite
Sodium Acetate, Anhydrous
Sodium Acetate, Trihydrate
Sodium Ammonium Phosphate,4-hydrate
Sodium Benzoate
Sodium Bicarbonate
Sodium Bisulfate
Sodium Bisulfite
Sodium Borate, anhydrous
Sodium Borate, pentahydrate
Sodium Borate, decahydrate
Sodium Borohydride
Sodium Bromate
Sodium Bromide
Sodium Carbonate, Anhydrous NF
Sodium Carbonate Monohydrate
Sodium Chlorate
Sodium Chloride USP
Sodium Chlorite
Sodium Chromate, 4-hydrate
Sodium Citrate, 2-hydrate
Sodium Dichromate, 2-hydrate
Sodium Dithionite
Sodium Ferrocyanide
Sodium Fluoride USP Powder
Sodium Formate
Sodium Formate 50% Solution
Sodium Gluconate
Sodium Hexametaphosphate
Sodium Hydride
Sodium Hydrosulfite
Sodium Hydroxide NF Pellets
Sodium Hydroxide 50% Solution
Sodium Hydroxide Analytical Std. Solution
Sodium Hypochlorite 12%
Sodium Hypophosphite
Sodium Iodate
Sodium Iodide
Sodium Isoascorbate
Sodium Lactate 60%
Sodium Lauryl Sulfate 30%
Sodium Lauryl Sulfate powder
Sodium metaSilicate (Metso)
Sodium Molybdate, 2-hydrate
Sodium Nitrate FCC
Sodium Nitrite
Sodium Nitrobenzoate
Sodium Oleate
Sodium Oxalate
Sodium Peroxide
Sodium Persulfate
Sodium Phosphate Monobasic, monohydrate
Sodium Phosphate Dibasic, Anhydrous
Sodium Phosphate Dibasic, 7-hydrate USP
Sodium Phosphate Dibasic, 12-hydrate
Sodium Phosphate Tribasic, 12-hydrate
Sodium Potassium Tartrate
Sodium Propionate
Sodium Pyrophosphate, 10-hydrate
Sodium Salicylate
Sodium Selenite
Sodium Silicate
Sodium Stannate
Sodium Sulfate, Anhydrous
Sodium Sulfate, 10-hydrate
Sodium Sulfide
Sodium Sulfite
Sodium Tartrate
Sodium Thiocyanate
Sodium Thiosulfate, Anhydrous
Sodium Thiosulfate, 5-hydrate
Sodium Thiosulfate Standard Solutions
Sodium Tripolyphosphate
Sodium Tungstate, 2-hydrate
Sorbic Acid
Sorbitol
Sorbitol 70%
SPADNS
Stannic Chloride, 5-hydrate
Stannic Oxide
Stannous Chloride, 2-hydrate
Stannous Sulfate
Starch
Stearic Acid
Steary Alcohol
Strontium Carbonate
Strontium Chloride
Strontium Nitrate
Styrene
Succinic Acid
Succinic Anhydride
Sucrose
Sulfamic Acid
Sulfanilic Acid, Anhydrous
Sulfur, Precipitated USP
Sulfuric Acid
Sulfuric Acid Analytical Concentrates

T
Talc
Tannic Acid
Tartaric Acid
Taurin
Tellurium, metal
Tetrachloroethylene
Tetra Ethyl Ammonium Hydroxide 20%
Tetra Ethyl Ammonium Hydroxide 40%
Tetrahydrofuran
Thiamine Hydrochloride
Thiamine Mononitrate
Thiourea
L-Threonine
Thymol
Thymol Iodide
Tin, metal
Titanium Dioxide
Titanium Tetrachloride
Titanium Trichloride
Toluene
Toluol
Tributyl Phosphate
Trichloroacetic Acid
Trichlorobenzene
Trichloroethylene
Tricresyl Phosphate
Triethanolamine
Triethylamine
Triethylene Glycol
Trimethyl Pentane, - 2,2,4
Triphenyl Phosphite
Tris (base)
Tris Buffer
Tris Hydrochloride
Trisodium Citrate
Trisodium Phosphate 12-hydrate FCC
Triton X-100
Triton X-200
Trolamine
Tromethamine
L-Tryptophan
Tungstic Acid
Tween
Tyrosine,-L

U/V/W
Urea USP
L-Valine
Vanadium Pentoxide
Vitamin C

                         X/Y/Z
Xylene
Xylenes
Zinc, metal
Zinc Acetate, 2-hydrate
Zinc Carbonate
Zinc Chloride
Zinc Chloride 50%
Zinc Citrate
Zinc Oxide USP Powder
Zinc Phenylsulfonate
Zinc Stearate
Zinc Sulfate, 7-hydrate
Zinc Sulfate Monohydrate

ommit all of the oxygen waxes and water in all of these chemical
compunds and then add light. that is a time frame that chooses upon
it's logic without a gut feeling. light is always there however matter
is ever being split when it collides with water the twenty one amino
acids consist primarily of...
Alanine
Arginine
Asparagine
Aspartic Acid
Cysteine
Glutamic Acid
Glutamine
Glycine
Histidine
Isoleucine
Leucine
Lysine
Methionine
Phenylalanine
Proline
Serine
Threonine
Tryptophan
Tyrosine
Valine
all of which are naturally acurring

The last one is in the seminal vesicle of which is for creating life!
(fact: all twelve essential amino acids must be present in the gut at
the
same time for a complete protein to be formed for a 1000 year life or
so as
in the individual decisions of a person) to have eternal life is easy
we
should eat only red apples, bannanas, carrots, and drink milk and honey
no water we do not have to rid our system of toxins it does not have.
however women on the other hand must have the water to create their own
milk for their children. you see i have been misdiagnosed with having
schytsophrenia "disorder" however it was only disorderly conduct and
not any other item that i was lacking in my mind. ok now that that is
over with lets build a time machine. have you ever seen those little
spinners they skip from time to matter and back again without making
one
little sound! i think that they consist of zinc chloride mixed with a
constitutional alliance made of aluminum oxide and a chemical found in
a tree that replaces bones in the body it might be found in wikepedia
the free information goo roo help me out here. There was a man he had a
grad ole plan and in this plan there was a man this
man was the loneliest man in all the land. He wrote his heart until it
flew
up to the sky oh so blue! America oh why oh why is there blood in the
sky?
It must've been all the sin the earth did see. How grand the plan for
that
man to live a day
with the rays
of sun on his back and a horse to ride all day
long until he sighed...I need something there is nothing for me.
Why can't I see?
I lack the strength it seems so far
but that is it there is much more.
Mine eyes are bright
there is the light
it's all about peace and not
the fight.
The rust
of America has turned to crust
there is too much lust
that must
cease to be
oh please I pray give me
a wife all day and night
I dream a dream that dream of a smidgen of light
in all that is me
you see
it is my brain that encompasses all that is in me
it  brings a memory
there is science and there is math
and that is not fun without the path
to have a wife a wife of all
and yes to fall
knock on my door come in my castle
I have a lot of tastles
I live quite quaint
not very faint
i I am twenty five
i am alive
i almost committed suicide
that is not right
i have to fight
for all that is right
in all that is life
I am 6 feet tall
and i'm good at football
that's not all
i love to learn
and yern and yern
i like to ski upon my knee
oh yes i have legs upon me
i ran a race
one day i kept the pace
i was 50th in state
i weight 190
i don't have brandy
call me my number is 1-801-491-6942 it is a give away. 527 Swenson Ave.
Springville, UT 84663
(your friend Dean Russel Hartwig)
a line from karate kid " Wax on. Wax off. Wax on. Wax off. Side to side
paint the fence" Create a circle going counter clockwise with your
right hand. Then, create a circle going clockwise with your left hand.
Move side to side. Then, paint the fence. the right shere is water the
left shere is the brain. the paint is time in one straight line going
up and down. the movement is the shere (seer) of earth the mother of
eve from whence she was made. I love this did I get a good grade?
visual word - 24 Jul 2006 11:57 GMT
ok realy simple water O2 + all of the chemicals listed in the universe
+ Hydrogen equals the big bang and there are an infinite amount of big
bangs' that accur in the universe as a whole.
xxein@bellsouth.net - 25 Jul 2006 00:56 GMT
> ok realy simple water O2 + all of the chemicals listed in the universe
> + Hydrogen equals the big bang and there are an infinite amount of big
> bangs' that accur in the universe as a whole.

xxein:  --- Being tempered by the ~absolute size wrt ~absolute time.
Adiabatics are not limited to a classroom experiment.
BernardZ - 24 Jul 2006 12:03 GMT
> This is for artistic purposes--I'm trying to find some kind of formula
> that can be expressed concisely and somewhat visually, ie, E=MC2, which
> could be seen as somehow defining reality, or "the meaning of life", so
> to speak. It will be used in a painting, alongside other
> reality-defining things like religious texts and so on.

One of the most beautiful equations in mathematics is this one that
joins a real number with a complex number I.

-1=exp(-pi * i/2)

Signature

If you are not there at the close, you will not get the sale.

Observations of Bernard - No 102

Osidog - 24 Jul 2006 13:29 GMT
> > This is for artistic purposes--I'm trying to find some kind of formula
> > that can be expressed concisely and somewhat visually, ie, E=MC2, which
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> -1=exp(-pi * i/2)

Yes indeed. That's the gift that just keeps on giving.

> --
> If you are not there at the close, you will not get the sale.
>
> Observations of Bernard - No 102

--

Build your house before inviting guests over to visit it.
Observation of Osidog - No 122
jem - 24 Jul 2006 13:48 GMT
>>This is for artistic purposes--I'm trying to find some kind of formula
>>that can be expressed concisely and somewhat visually, ie, E=MC2, which
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> -1=exp(-pi * i/2)

If all you want is an equation that relates real and complex numbers,
there's a much easier one: i^2 = -1.

Your equation (i.e. Euler's) is particularly noteworthy in the form:

 e^(pi*i) + 1 = 0,

which concisely links 5 of mathematics' most ubiquitous constants.
xxein@bellsouth.net - 25 Jul 2006 03:52 GMT
> >>This is for artistic purposes--I'm trying to find some kind of formula
> >>that can be expressed concisely and somewhat visually, ie, E=MC2, which
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> which concisely links 5 of mathematics' most ubiquitous constants.

xxein:  I am interested and impressed.  Which mathematical constants?

But, does these mathematical constants apply to the physic or only to a
physical "theory" as described by some mathematic to go along with it?
Iow, is math a pregenesis?  Or do we let an apple describe an orange?
Whose terms do we use to identify one to the other?

In the genesis of the quantum world, a math is created only after there
are two - not one.  'One' is simply an existence with no math --- no
relations.  So it seems as though existence is necessarily prior to a
math.  Math demands an "if/then" relationship.

Math requires a substrate.  In the absence of the physical, it can
substitute to the abstract.  Numbers.  They are counting numbers that
can represent something real or not.  Numbers rely on our imagination
to represent what we wish them to represent.  But in their essence,
numbers are only a recognisable difference.  We give it extended form
with an abstract form called 'numbers'.

All numbers are therefor imaginary.  Numbers are then to be simply
defined as what we wish to identify/ them with.  Conceptual application
beyond the abstract.  But it is only we that made numbers into numbers.
Otherwise it is just plain old physic --- existence with dynamic
if/then's.

So what are numbers then?
Igor - 25 Jul 2006 17:55 GMT
> > >>This is for artistic purposes--I'm trying to find some kind of formula
> > >>that can be expressed concisely and somewhat visually, ie, E=MC2, which
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> xxein:  I am interested and impressed.  Which mathematical constants?

Didn't you notice them?  They're e, pi, i, 1, and 0.

> But, does these mathematical constants apply to the physic or only to a
> physical "theory" as described by some mathematic to go along with it?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> relations.  So it seems as though existence is necessarily prior to a
> math.  Math demands an "if/then" relationship.

Math can be anything you wish it to be.  The only requirement of math
is that any statements you make must be mutually consistent.

> Math requires a substrate.  In the absence of the physical, it can
> substitute to the abstract.  Numbers.  They are counting numbers that
> can represent something real or not.  Numbers rely on our imagination
> to represent what we wish them to represent.  But in their essence,
> numbers are only a recognisable difference.  We give it extended form
> with an abstract form called 'numbers'.

Math doesn't require physics or any form of science, but science
requires math.

> All numbers are therefore imaginary.

Careful, since the concept of imaginary number has a very precise
definition in math, not all numbers are imaginary.  If you're saying
that all numbers are abstractions, you'd be more correct.

>Numbers are then to be simply
> defined as what we wish to identify/ them with.  Conceptual application
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> So what are numbers then?

Abstract mathematical concepts. Nothing physical about them.  Don't
confuse a numerical representation for a number.
bernardz - 26 Jul 2006 04:04 GMT
> > Math requires a substrate.  In the absence of the physical, it can
> > substitute to the abstract.  Numbers.  They are counting numbers that
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Math doesn't require physics or any form of science, but science
> requires math.

Science does not require maths, but many branches of science find it
very useful to use maths.
xxein@bellsouth.net - 27 Jul 2006 03:48 GMT
> > > >>This is for artistic purposes--I'm trying to find some kind of formula
> > > >>that can be expressed concisely and somewhat visually, ie, E=MC2, which
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
> Abstract mathematical concepts. Nothing physical about them.  Don't
> confuse a numerical representation for a number.

xxein:  So, since physics is particular, then we cannot just apply a
math to suit all seasons.
isaacinspace@gmail.com - 26 Jul 2006 05:53 GMT
> >>This is for artistic purposes--I'm trying to find some kind of formula
> >>that can be expressed concisely and somewhat visually, ie, E=MC2, which
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> which concisely links 5 of mathematics' most ubiquitous constants.

Also interesting. Can you explain that idea a little more? Any
additional information about how this equation works that a
non-mathematician would understand?
Thanks!

-Isaac
BernardZ - 26 Jul 2006 11:45 GMT
> > >>This is for artistic purposes--I'm trying to find some kind of formula
> > >>that can be expressed concisely and somewhat visually, ie, E=MC2, which
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> -Isaac

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_identity

Euler's identity is remarkable for its mathematical beauty. Three basic
arithmetic functions are present exactly once: addition, multiplication,
and exponentiation. As well, the identity links five fundamental
mathematical constants:

   * The number 0.
   * The number 1.
   * The number ?, which is ubiquitous in trigonometry, Euclidean
geometry, and mathematical analysis.
   * The number e, the base of natural logarithms, which occurs widely
in mathematical analysis.
   * The number i, imaginary unit of the complex numbers, which contain
the roots of all nonconstant polynomials and lead to deeper insight into
many operators, such as integration.

Furthermore, in mathematical analysis, equations are commonly written
with zero on one side.

A reader poll conducted by Physics World in 2004 named Euler's identity
the "greatest equation ever", together with Maxwell's equations.

Constance Reid even claimed that Euler's identity was "the most famous
formula in all mathematics".

Gauss is reported to have commented that if this formula was not
immediately apparent to a student on being told it, the student would
never be a first-class mathematician.[1]

After proving the identity in a lecture, Benjamin Peirce, a noted
nineteenth century mathematician and Harvard professor, said, "It is
absolutely paradoxical; we cannot understand it, and we don't know what
it means, but we have proved it, and therefore we know it must be the
truth." [2]

Signature

If you are not there at the close, you will not get the sale.

Observations of Bernard - No 102

jem - 26 Jul 2006 13:36 GMT
>>>>This is for artistic purposes--I'm trying to find some kind of formula
>>>>that can be expressed concisely and somewhat visually, ie, E=MC2, which
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> -Isaac

Well, the equation "works" because e*(pi*i) = -1.  How's that for a
simple "explanation"?  Unfortunately, coming up with a simple
"non-mathematician level" explanation for how/why *that* equation works
isn't that simple.  It has to do with the fact that e (i.e. the base of
natural logarithms) is intimately connected to the process of
exponentiation, the fact that raising any number to the power of i (i.e.
the square root of -1) four times in succession gets back the original
number (i.e. is a periodic operation), and the fact that pi (i.e. half
the period of the trigonmetric functions) is intimately connected to
periodic operations.

Anyone who's successfully completed a first year Calculus course should
be able to verify the correctness of the equation (see e.g.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EulerFormula.html), but a fuller
appreciation of its significance can be obtained from a course in
Complex Analysis.
jem - 29 Jul 2006 14:06 GMT
>>>>> This is for artistic purposes--I'm trying to find some kind of formula
>>>>> that can be expressed concisely and somewhat visually, ie, E=MC2,
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> appreciation of its significance can be obtained from a course in
> Complex Analysis.

A little Euler's formula trivia: the folks in UCONN's math department
flaunt school pride on T-shirts that read "We're number e^(2*pi*i)".
Igor - 26 Jul 2006 17:25 GMT
> > >>This is for artistic purposes--I'm trying to find some kind of formula
> > >>that can be expressed concisely and somewhat visually, ie, E=MC2, which
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> -Isaac

Well, Euler also discovered that any number raised to an imaginary
power could be written as a simpler complex number.  Specifically, he
discovered that any imaginary power of e (the natural log base) breaks
down as e ^ (i x) = cos x  + i sin x.  Today this is easily verified by
Taylor analysis.  When x  = pi, we have e ^(i pi) = cos pi + i sin pi
= - 1.
surrealistic-dream@hotmail.com - 24 Jul 2006 15:48 GMT
> Hello, I am an ignorant layman with only rudimentary knowledge of math
> and physics. I read about things like the Unified Field Theory, Theory
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> -Isaac

Maybe for visual effect you could use this quote from Einstein and
Infeld :"Free creations of the human mind."

The entire quote goes like this

Physical concepts are free creations of the human mind, and are not,
however it may seem, uniquely determined by the external world."
 --- The Evolution of Physics, p31.
goodbyeblueskye@yahoo.dk - 24 Jul 2006 16:39 GMT
> Hello, I am an ignorant layman with only rudimentary knowledge of math
> and physics. I read about things like the Unified Field Theory, Theory
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Any ideas on this would be much appreciated. Thanks.

In physics, the most succinct description of the universe would be
SU(3)×SU(2)×U(1).
Igor - 24 Jul 2006 21:32 GMT
> > Hello, I am an ignorant layman with only rudimentary knowledge of math
> > and physics. I read about things like the Unified Field Theory, Theory
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> In physics, the most succinct description of the universe would be
> SU(3)×SU(2)×U(1).

Not really.  It's still missing gravity.
isaacinspace@gmail.com - 26 Jul 2006 05:50 GMT
> > Hello, I am an ignorant layman with only rudimentary knowledge of math
> > and physics. I read about things like the Unified Field Theory, Theory
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> In physics, the most succinct description of the universe would be
> SU(3)×SU(2)×U(1).

Interesting. Can you explain a little what that formula means, and how
it would be a description of the universe?

-Isaac
Igor - 26 Jul 2006 17:18 GMT
> > > Hello, I am an ignorant layman with only rudimentary knowledge of math
> > > and physics. I read about things like the Unified Field Theory, Theory
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> -Isaac

It's not a formula.  It's a Lie group consisting of SU(3) for the
strong interaction, SU(2) for the weak interaction, and U(1) for the
electromagnetic.  These are the underlying groups that make up the
standard model of particle physics.  Conspicuously absent is gravity,
which we have yet to quantize, if it's even possible.
tomgee - 26 Jul 2006 08:56 GMT
> Hello, I am an ignorant layman with only rudimentary knowledge of math
> and physics. I read about things like the Unified Field Theory, Theory
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> -Isaac

Isaac, I'm afraid the answer to your question is no.  There is no one
theory or formula/equation that can be said to define physics or the
universe.  Physics is a two-sided science.  It is an empirical science,

but there exists also a Theoretical Physics branch of it that disdains
experiment while embracing mathematics and supposition to explain
what is observed.  Einstein is the most famous of those, but there
are many like him around today, and as many theories of the universe
as there are theoretical physicists, I would guess.

On the (real) physics side are those who seek answers to the puzzles
in quantum mechanics and particle physics through hard data from
experimental research.  There we have the fudgers and the out-and-
out frauds, but not too many, I think, because there are too physicists

following up on claims for them to fool too many people for long.

It's the hard working researchers who define the whole of physics;
those who confirm and validate the ideas that come from theory,
or show their invalidity when they don't pan out.

Theories about the universe are forged in Theoretical Physics, since
we can only guess at many of our ideas about that.  When something
can be confirmed, it helps a lot to encourage us to go on.  Today
the Big Bang Theory was made more meaningful when it was con-
firmed more recently that the universe is expanding.  The BBT is
based on the concept of a so-called singularity, which is very similar
to what we call black holes today, except there is a size different in
a
BH vs a singularity.

Earth is, I would say, between the macro-sized universe and the
fundamental atomic particles.  Only an artist could find a way to
define its importance in the universe.  It is important only because
it holds life in it, and until we find life elsewhere, the earth is
unique
in the universe for that one feature.

You have set yourself a very hard task, because you have to choose
from so much on the one hand, and so little on the other.  Good luck.
I for one would appreciate learning how you came out with this.
vertvergon@msn.com - 27 Jul 2006 23:33 GMT
> Hello, I am an ignorant layman with only rudimentary knowledge of math
> and physics. I read about things like the Unified Field Theory, Theory
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> -Isaac

VERGON
Isaac, don't look for the answer in a magical equation. Einstein tried
to find one he called the Unified Field Theory. At the end of 35 years
he gave up and said that at least he proved it couldn't be done.

Think about this. Is it not possible that the unification of the
universe lies in the fact that there is only ONE type particle in the
universe? And that this particle combines with others in a fractile
like manner to form the complex universe we behold? Example, the 600
page novel Gone With the Wind is comprised of only 26 letters. The
alphabet is simple -- the novel complex.

If you want to see the paper explaining all this go to
http://www.wbabin.net -- find the pull down LIST OF AUTHORS and click
on Vertner Vergon, That will take you to a monograph titled On the
Quantum, as a Physical Entity.

Read it. You will find it not comlicated and very easy to understand.
The beauty of the universe lies in it's utter simplicity.
David Thomson - 30 Jul 2006 12:52 GMT
> Hello, I am an ignorant layman with only rudimentary knowledge of math
> and physics. I read about things like the Unified Field Theory, Theory
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Any ideas on this would be much appreciated. Thanks.

Hi Isaac,

Actually, there is now such a theory.  It is called the Aether Physics
Model.  It is fairly new and just now beginning to gain academic
acceptance.

This theory lends itself quite well to artistic expression and also
provides several equations and constants, which could be symbolic of
the creation of existence and of existence, itself.

You can read a paper on the theory at:
http://www.16pi2.com/files/NewFoundationPhysics.pdf

Dave
Tom Roberts - 30 Jul 2006 14:50 GMT
> Actually, there is now such a theory.  It is called the Aether Physics
> Model.  It is fairly new and just now beginning to gain academic
> acceptance.

David Thomson has an active imagination. His theory appears to be
complete nonsense. Moreover, he has not described how it explains the
many experiments that have tested SR. Without that, there will never be
any "academic acceptance".

Tom Roberts
David Thomson - 30 Jul 2006 15:38 GMT
> > Actually, there is now such a theory.  It is called the Aether Physics
> > Model.  It is fairly new and just now beginning to gain academic
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> many experiments that have tested SR. Without that, there will never be
> any "academic acceptance".

Tom has an inactive intellect, which is unfortunately unable to
understand a rather simple, and yet useful, theory of quantum
structure.  The academic acceptance is already beginning by those far
more qualified than Tom.  Fortunately, the more intelligent minds in
this world are capable of doing the math and geometry necessary to
understand quantum structure.

You are encouraged to review the theory for yourself, rather than rely
on Tom's unfounded personal opinions.

Dave
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.