> More from Apeiron, H.A. Munera thinks that the photon has rest mass:
>
> http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/Pre2001/V04NO2PDF/V04N2MU2.PDF
> > More from Apeiron, H.A. Munera thinks that the photon has rest mass:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Now that mass times the frequency NUMBER will yield the mass of the
> photon.
This is disproved by experimental evidence.
For example, the mass of a photon with a wavelength of 550 nm would be,
f = c / lambda = 5.45 * 10^14
m = 7.372*10^-48 * 5.45*10^14 = 4*10^-33 grams
The limit on photon mass is less than 10^-51 grams, as described here:
http://www.aip.org/pnu/2003/split/625-2.html
> Observe further, that mass times the frequency number of the electron,
> proton, and neutron will yield their respective masses.
This is untrue. for a massive particle,
f = E_kinetic / h = gamma.m.c^2 - m.c^2
gamma.m =/= h / c^2 * f
m =/= h / c^2 * f
However, if instead of frequency you use Compton frequency f_C, we get,
m = h / c^2 * f_C
But this is no surprise, since from the Compton wavelength equation,
lambda_C = h / m.c
c / f_C = h / m.c
c = h.f_C / m.c
m.c^2 = h.f_C
m = h.f_C / c^2
> This shows that radiation and matter are constructed of the same basic
> element,
And that element is energy.
> The difference being that the elements in radiation are arranged in a
> sequential manner, and in matter they are arranged in a standing wave
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Since pair production produces an electron and a positron, this tells
> us that radiation consists of both matter and antimatter constituents.