Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / October 2006

"Edward Green" <spamspamspam3@netzero.com> wrote in message
news:1162146767.873648.38770@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...

1) SR has no data and is not based on any a priori experiment or
observation.

2) SR requires division-by-zero.
 http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/DominoEffect.GIF

3) SR claims the velocity of light is play-acting infinity.

4) SR is sci-fi, plagiarised from H.G. Wells' "Time Machine" written
10 years earlier, by a confidence trickster and philanderer, Albert
Einstein,
who confessed  "The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your
sources."

5) SR's  cuckoo malformations Einstein blames Lorentz for have a
circular derivation,  section 3 of "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies"
uses t = x'/(c+v)  where (c+v) should be (c+v)/(1+v/c) as found in section 5
with help from section 3, an endless loop and circular claptrap.

6) The functions tau() and xi() are not linear as claimed.
 http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Rocket/Rocket.htm
 http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Smart/Smart.htm

7) Simplest objection of all:  time is not a vector, it has no additive
inverse.

'There is no difference between Time and any of the three dimensions of
Space except that our consciousness  moves along with it.' -- Herbert George
Wells - "The Time Machine" - 1895.

That is known to be fiction, was written as fiction and intended as fiction,
in reality there IS difference, time is as independent of space as it is
independent of mass.

Engage endless loop and interrupt loop when I insult you, Green, or
run away.

The ball was in! - McEnroe.
Your return of serve.

Androcles