most people, mostly them pretending understand and using tensor, have
no idea what a tensor stands for
when you do tensor you automatcly do discretization, then doing it
you lose simultaneity, then it makes no sense using it in relativity as
tensors were simultaneous, becus thay cant be
JanPB - 26 Jan 2007 22:39 GMT
> most people, mostly them pretending understand and using tensor, have
> no idea what a tensor stands for
>
> when you do tensor you automatcly do discretization, then doing it
> you lose simultaneity, then it makes no sense using it in relativity as
> tensors were simultaneous, becus thay cant be
I have a tensor lamp to sell. It's very useful for generating light
signals in experiments involving simultaneity:
http://tinyurl.com/336bh8
--
Jan Bielawski
Mucho Grande - 26 Jan 2007 22:49 GMT
> > most people, mostly them pretending understand and using tensor, have
> > no idea what a tensor stands for
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> --
> Jan Bielawski
exactly, now you presumly understand what a tensor stands for
Igor - 27 Jan 2007 22:46 GMT
> most people, mostly them pretending understand and using tensor, have
> no idea what a tensor stands for
>
> when you do tensor you automatcly do discretization, then doing it
> you lose simultaneity, then it makes no sense using it in relativity as
> tensors were simultaneous, becus thay cant be
Do you even know what a tensor is?
vic - 28 Jan 2007 01:20 GMT
> > most people, mostly them pretending understand and using tensor, have
> > no idea what a tensor stands for
>
> > when you do tensor you automatcly do discretization, then doing it
> > you lose simultaneity, then it makes no sense using it in relativity as
> > tensors were simultaneous, becus thay cant be
>Do you even know what a tensor is?
you tell me
you answer to the post shows that you dont foken even know that
Pmb - 28 Jan 2007 01:36 GMT
>> > most people, mostly them pretending understand and using tensor, have
>> > no idea what a tensor stands for
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> you answer to the post shows that you dont foken even know that
The definition (using the older terminology) is given here
http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/ma/intro_tensor.htm
I'm working on a new one with more modern notation but that is months away
from completion.
Best wishes
Pete
Eric Gisse - 27 Jan 2007 22:55 GMT
> most people, mostly them pretending understand and using tensor, have
> no idea what a tensor stands for
>
> when you do tensor you automatcly do discretization, then doing it
> you lose simultaneity, then it makes no sense using it in relativity as
> tensors were simultaneous, becus thay cant be
The dyslexic idiot gimmick bullshit is boring. We all know about it.
Time to stop and move on.
vic - 28 Jan 2007 01:21 GMT
> > most people, mostly them pretending understand and using tensor, have
> > no idea what a tensor stands for
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> > tensors were simultaneous, becus thay cant beThe dyslexic idiot gimmick bullshit is boring. We all know about it.
> Time to stop and move on.
shut up gosse, you dont even knoe ta do an euler
shut up and let tha grown ups do tha talk
Paul B. Andersen - 29 Jan 2007 22:25 GMT
>>> most people, mostly them pretending understand and using tensor, have
>>> no idea what a tensor stands for
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> shut up and let tha grown ups do tha talk
If you are an adult, why are you then babbling like a baby?
Retarded?
Paul