That's right. My server has not been posting or receiving messages for three
days so I have reposted all of mine. Sorry about that.
In case you think I was running away from your questions, I wasn't.
> That's right. My server has not been posting or receiving messages for three
> days so I have reposted all of mine. Sorry about that.
> In case you think I was running away from your questions, I wasn't.
How many diplomas did you manage to forge during these
three days, Ralph?
Dirk Vdm
> That's right. My server has not been posting or receiving messages for three
> days so I have reposted all of mine. Sorry about that.
> In case you think I was running away from your questions, I wasn't.
The difference being what, exactly?
You are incapable of honestly discussing your theories, Henri. For
several years now I have asked you for the mathematical basis of your
theory - you have refused to provide it. Now Paul is asking the same
thing of you, and you keep dodging the request.
You are a dishonest man who has presented forged diplomas as evidence
of a physics education and excuses as to why you haven't actually
written any papers on the subject. Your standards of proof and
evidence are laughably bad - if you were not such an intellectual
hermit you would see the orders of magnitude difference between what
you call evidence and what the rest of the universe calls evidence.
You will, as before, insult me and ignore my points. I, as before,
will continue to be mystified as to why you are so arrogant. The
theories you claim as your own are whatever sound-bites you can think
of but not support [time has three subdimensions, space is
logarithmic, c+v, etc] and Newtonian mechanics. You will continue to,
as before, decry every experiment that _proves_ you wrong as
"unbelievable" as if someone who forges diplomas has any standing to
say such a thing much less be listened to.
Your ideas will be forever trapped on this newsgroup because you are
incapable or unwilling to actually write them down in a coherent way
that does not depend on asking you what they mean so they can be
published.
I wonder what non-response awaits me!
Henri Wilson - 30 Jan 2007 03:39 GMT
>> That's right. My server has not been posting or receiving messages for three
>> days so I have reposted all of mine. Sorry about that.
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
>I wonder what non-response awaits me!
Yap yap!
Eric Gisse - 30 Jan 2007 03:47 GMT
> >> That's right. My server has not been posting or receiving messages for three
> >> days so I have reposted all of mine. Sorry about that.
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> Yap yap!
This is what Henri Wilson has been reduced to - spouting off one
liners rather than respond to criticism.
Henri Wilson - 30 Jan 2007 05:19 GMT
>> >> That's right. My server has not been posting or receiving messages for three
>> >> days so I have reposted all of mine. Sorry about that.
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>This is what Henri Wilson has been reduced to - spouting off one
>liners rather than respond to criticism.
How would I know it's criticism when I don't read your messages?
The Ghost In The Machine - 30 Jan 2007 06:02 GMT
In sci.physics.relativity, HW@....(Henri Wilson)
<HW@>
wrote
on Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:19:22 GMT
<8altr29i6n1afo9l0g8a967hstf59qg715@4ax.com>:
>>> >> That's right. My server has not been posting or receiving messages for three
>>> >> days so I have reposted all of mine. Sorry about that.
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> How would I know it's criticism when I don't read your messages?
If you're not reading Eric G.'s messages, how did you respond thereto?
(Ow. Brain. Ow.)

Signature
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
/dev/signature: No such file or directory
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Henri Wilson - 30 Jan 2007 22:24 GMT
>In sci.physics.relativity, HW@....(Henri Wilson)
><HW@>
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>
>(Ow. Brain. Ow.)
It was an IQ test.
You pased. Geesey failed.
Eric Gisse - 30 Jan 2007 06:18 GMT
> >> >> That's right. My server has not been posting or receiving messages for three
> >> >> days so I have reposted all of mine. Sorry about that.
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> How would I know it's criticism when I don't read your messages?
Which is why there *aren't* a dozen replies from you to me in the last
few days? Oh wait, there are.
Can't you even lie intelligently, Henri? Or does your stupidity affect
that as well?
PD - 30 Jan 2007 17:41 GMT
> > >> >I wonder what non-response awaits me!
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Can't you even lie intelligently, Henri? Or does your stupidity affect
> that as well?
It's remarkably sad that Henri is so starved for human interaction
that he would rather set himself up for abuse than to be quiet and
have no one notice him. There can be no other explanation why he
unfailingly posts obvious pretenses about himself, makes statements
that he knows are both idiotic and sound idiotic, and is willing to
hop and dodge in a clumsy little dance rather than to answer simple
questions. It takes someone with absolutely no sense of self-respect,
combined with a compulsive need for attention, to so readily play a
fool. He is congenitally unable to blush.
PD
Henri Wilson - 30 Jan 2007 22:23 GMT
>> > >> >I wonder what non-response awaits me!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>combined with a compulsive need for attention, to so readily play a
>fool. He is congenitally unable to blush.
geez! I seem to have upset ALL of Dinky's apprentices.
>PD
Dirk Van de moortel - 30 Jan 2007 22:36 GMT
>>> > >> >I wonder what non-response awaits me!
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> geez! I seem to have upset ALL of Dinky's apprentices.
Thanks for the compliment, Ralph.
Dirk Vdm