 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / February 2007big bang v. creation
what is the difference between big bang and creation theory > what is the difference between big bang > and creation theory one is based on religion the other on science. > > and creation theory > > one is based on religion the other on science. their particular fundation is not tha question what is tha difference between them it self, now that you have them >> the difference between big bang >> > and creation theory [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > what is tha difference between them it self, now > that you have them the difference is that you believe one or the other. since no one can believe both there is no logical method to make a comparison since it would always be biased by your own beliefs. > what is the difference between big bang > and creation theory As Steven Hawking has written, the big bang smacks of divine intervention. Shubee >> what is the difference between big bang >> and creation theory [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Shubee Poor choice of words then. Creators are always in their creations. Creations are always in their creators. That then smacks of duality and eternity -- smacking of constancy, not intervention. There is no difference between the Big Bang surface and horizon (large) and the Planck surface and horizon (small). The unit constants of both are the same. Both are the same fundamental, fundamentally constant. There is no way that we today should be witnessing any very distant light-time, yet we do [constantly]. All of the light from all that distant background should have been absorbed by now in a Universe that on, or in, its surface, should be universally hotter than the fire pit of Hell. Oops! It [is] precisely that. It [is] universally hotter than the fire pit of Hell [on or in its surface], its Planck surface! "Deja-vu all over again," as the great Yogi Berra might say. GLB >what is the difference between big bang >and creation theory [Hammond] Simple: "CREATION" Refers to the "creation of time itself" (past present and future) with the advent of the human mind (approx 100,000 years ago) which is the "creation of reality", since without a (human) observer, there is no such thing as reality, time, or the universe. The "Big Bang" refers to the beginning of the Universe within the existence of time itself and happened 14 billion years ago "within time itself". Hence we see that even though the Big Bang happened 14 billion years ago "within time", we see that "time itself" is only 100,000 years old, hence the Creation which happened 100k years ago is "OLDER" than the Big Bang wehich happened 14 billion years ago.... or as it is sometimes expressed... "God is older than the Big Bang". By the way, you have to be "smart" to understand this... the average stalkerazzi heckling Usenet amateur punk CANNOT understand this, which is WHY they can't understand what "God" is. You have to have an IQ over 130 to understand what "God" is. ======================================== SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god mirror site: http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3) http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 ======================================== THEREFORE, we see that although On Feb 24, 5:47 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.org> wrote: > On 24 Feb 2007 07:01:20 -0800, "wine" > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > present and future) with the advent of the human mind > (approx 100,000 years ago) which is the "creation of crap, approx ususlly means we dont know sh.t humans are not important, and they been arround much longe3r than that > reality", since without a (human) observer, there is no such > thing as reality, time, or the universe. crap even more are humans tha center of universe ? you fooool > The "Big Bang" refers to the beginning of the Universe > within the existence of time itself and happened 14 billion > years ago "within time itself". crap, 20 bil, 30 bill, any billions > Hence we see that even though the Big Bang happened 14 > billion years ago "within time", we see that "time itself" > is only 100,000 years old, hence the Creation which happened > 100k years ago is "OLDER" than the Big Bang wehich happened > 14 billion years ago.... or as it is sometimes expressed... crap, you dont even know your bible, according ta it tha world is only 6000 years old > "God is older than the Big Bang" you fool, god is ethernal, hoe could it been just older? > By the way, you have to be "smart" to understand this... the > average stalkerazzi heckling Usenet amateur punk CANNOT > understand this, which is WHY they can't understand what > "God" is. You have to have an IQ over 130 to understand > what "God" is. you mean 130 not even to not understand according to you god has a brain what is tha IQ of god? > ======================================== > SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > THEREFORE, we see that although > what is the difference between big bang > and creation theory One is tax funded, the other is tax exempt. >> what is the difference between big bang >> and creation theory > > One is tax funded, the other is tax exempt. now that is a good way to look at it! one is a theory the other isn't hence, no comparison between the "theories", since you need more than 1 theory to have a comparison Zarkovic wrote: > one is a theory > the other isn't > hence, no comparison between the "theories", since you need more than 1 > theory to have a comparison One is where you load your baggage, the other is where you unload your baggage.  SignatureLife SpaceTours (tm) is not responsible for lost, misplaced or mangled baggage. All minors must be accompanied by an adult. Do *not* bring baby formula. Be prepared to be questioned and searched. Have a nice trip! > what is the difference between big bang > and creation theory One is a theory (has predictive power) and the other one isn't. One of them is connected with other scientifically tested models, such as those in particle physics, and the other one isn't. One of them will eventually be practically useful for the design of tools, and the other will never be. PD Do you want to see a Big Bang in 3D... 4D... 5D... 6D... ? http://contact.dec.free.fr or directly : http://contact.dec.free.fr/UNIVERS/Univ001.html |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.