Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / March 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Proposal for a new DOUBLE MAGNET Stern Gerlach experiment.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
LeoVuyk@gmail.com - 26 Mar 2007 19:33 GMT
Proposal for a new DOUBLE MAGNET Stern Gerlach experiment.
Proposal for a new DOUBLE MAGNET Stern Gerlach experiment to show how
the first vaporized silver atom, measured inside the S_G magnet, is
manipulating the polarization of the rest of the vaporized silver
atoms coming in, to be measured in the same S_G magnet.
It was John s. Bell who described an unresolved problem connected to
the well known STERN-GERLACH MAGNET experiment, one of the basic
experiments of all Quantum Mechanics.
He described the so called "lack of smearing" of the silver atoms on
the screen  as  crucial and unresolved.
He argued that the non polarized atom coming into the S-G magnet
should all have a different curved pathway into the direction of the
screen, resulting into a smeared profile of silver atom-dots, which is
not the case!
Until now I have not experienced a reasonable logic explanation for
this problem in the literature.
However if we assume that "multi-particle entanglement" comes here
into play, then there is a possibility for a delicate TEST.
See :
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/
Leo Vuyk.
Eric Gisse - 27 Mar 2007 03:16 GMT
On Mar 26, 10:33 am, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Proposal for a new DOUBLE MAGNET Stern Gerlach experiment.
> Proposal for a new DOUBLE MAGNET Stern Gerlach experiment to show how
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Until now I have not experienced a reasonable logic explanation for
> this problem in the literature.

Consider opening an introductory textbook on quantum mechanics which
will describe the coupling between the magnetic field and the spin of
the atoms.

> However if we assume that "multi-particle entanglement" comes here
> into play, then there is a possibility for a delicate TEST.

Of what? How clueless you are?

> See :http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/
> Leo Vuyk.
LeoVuyk@gmail.com - 27 Mar 2007 06:21 GMT
> On Mar 26, 10:33 am, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -

Hello Eric,

Do you think that John Bell was also ( like you suggest to me) that
stupid, not to study the facts?

Leo.
Eric Gisse - 27 Mar 2007 06:28 GMT
On Mar 26, 9:21 pm, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > On Mar 26, 10:33 am, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> Do you think that John Bell was also ( like you suggest to me) that
> stupid, not to study the facts?

Of course not.

I do, however, think that you do not have enough understanding of
quantum mechanics to understand how QM resolved the Stern-Gerlach
experiment and I also think you have no way of explaining why John
Bell and the Stern-Gerlach experiment are related.

> Leo.
LeoVuyk@gmail.com - 27 Mar 2007 09:15 GMT
> On Mar 26, 9:21 pm, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
>
> - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -

Hi Eric,

To say that you must have studied my alternative model for QM and GR
very well:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/

Indeed it is deviating from the mainstream, you are right.

Leo Vuyk.
Eric Gisse - 27 Mar 2007 17:45 GMT
On Mar 27, 12:15 am, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > On Mar 26, 9:21 pm, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
>
> Indeed it is deviating from the mainstream, you are right.

Oh of course, it just *would not do* to explain how John Bell and the
Stern Gerlach experiment are related. Instead, say something stupid.

> Leo Vuyk.
LeoVuyk@gmail.com - 27 Mar 2007 18:47 GMT
> On Mar 27, 12:15 am, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
>
> - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -

You also wrote:
> Spewing moron architect, why are you posting nonsense to this
> newsgroup when you don't have any clue about the words you use?

I repeat:
So you found already out that I am an architect, which is of coarse
my
weak point.
Well here I am, ready to be spewed on lots of dirt.
Leo.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.