Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / March 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

New Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider experiment and a Mathematical challenge

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
LeoVuyk@gmail.com - 27 Mar 2007 15:59 GMT
New Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider experiment and a Mathematical
challenge
New Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider experiment and a Mathematical
challenge to translate a new geometrical (Polar Ring) system for magic
numbered nuclei, into one formula.
If we imagine the magic numbered nuclei to have not only a symmetrical
shell structure of the nucleon distribution, but also a symmetrical
ring structure around a polar axis of nucleons,
THEN new possibilities to do experiments and math arise.

See:
http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/03/new-math-needed-for-new-nuclear.html

NEW EXPERIMENT:
A Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider ( like Brookhaven's RHIC) should be
able to show traces of this structure, if they are smashing Gold
nuclei or other atom nuclei with different spin directions together.
As an example: if both nuclear spin states of opposite coming nuclei,
are perpendicular oriented to the axis of motion, with a rotation
possibility relative to each other, then perpendicular relative spin
state will produce maximum debri products because of the statistical
chance to be hit.
Eric Gisse - 27 Mar 2007 17:49 GMT
On Mar 27, 6:59 am, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:

[snip spew]

Spewing moron architect, why are you posting nonsense to this
newsgroup when you don't have any clue about the words you use?
LeoVuyk@gmail.com - 27 Mar 2007 18:17 GMT
> On Mar 27, 6:59 am, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [snip spew]
>
> Spewing moron architect, why are you posting nonsense to this
> newsgroup when you don't have any clue about the words you use?

So you found already out that I am an architect, which is of coarse my
weak point.
Well here I am, ready to be spewed on lots of dirt.
Eric Gisse - 27 Mar 2007 22:05 GMT
On Mar 27, 9:17 am, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 27 mrt, 18:49, "EricGisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> So you found already out that I am an architect, which is of coarse my
> weak point.

It is about as much of a weak point as a gaping hole in the hull is a
'trouble spot' for a submarine.

> Well here I am, ready to be spewed on lots of dirt.
xxein@bellsouth.net - 29 Mar 2007 01:56 GMT
> On Mar 27, 9:17 am, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> It is about as much of a weak point as a gaping hole in the hull is a
> 'trouble spot' for a submarine.

xxein:  And so your crocodilian mind cannot grasp the thoughts of a
mammal and just uses the carcass for food?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.