Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Physics / Relativity / April 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

My Absolute Reference Frame

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Douglas Eagleson - 05 Apr 2007 14:29 GMT
t'=t/gamma

How do yo like that!

dt'/dc appears a solution while the solver tests always. SO in science
we always test the constancy of light as a truth.

In physical theory the constancy was given a law status.  So all light
in a vacuum appears constant in all theory of a class of theory.

Just like that class of theory is born.

In modern theory a symmetry of form or logic allows the principle to
be reformed inverted. And this now means:

A frame.

All constant as theory appears to be....

I loose the average person so I put dots.

Here is a modern theory implication out in theory land:

Pretent the world is a set of doppler signals for relativistic
conservation.  Which reference frame appears the constant! JUst as an
exercise inthinking.  A lack of knwledge of the single reference on
which to base the "sun circling the earth or the other way."

An analogy to lost reference.

Believe it.

All solid state light velocity appears slower than vacuum, and
therefor all solid causes a reference constant to exist.  And to
define it:

a= the lost differential constant.

All second differntial must conserve also allowing the frame of the
lost constant!
Bill Hobba - 06 Apr 2007 03:13 GMT
> t'=t/gamma
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> In physical theory the constancy was given a law status.

As has been explained time and time again the constancy of the velocity of
light is not a law or even a requirement of SR.  Quit posting rubbish that
simply demonstrates your ignorance - instead spend your time leering the
basics:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&c2coff=1&selm=54jfst%24glp%40ssbunews.
ih.lucent.com


Bill

> So all light
> in a vacuum appears constant in all theory of a class of theory.
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> All second differntial must conserve also allowing the frame of the
> lost constant!
Douglas Eagleson - 06 Apr 2007 12:08 GMT
> > t'=t/gamma
>
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

A certain reference frame was the test.  And the special frame was to
be the answer, not the implication.
Bill Hobba - 07 Apr 2007 01:55 GMT
>> > t'=t/gamma
>>
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> A certain reference frame was the test.  And the special frame was to
> be the answer, not the implication.

Why not address the assertion you made and my refutation of it rather than
use the standard crank tactic of irrelevant context switching?

Bill
karandash2000@yahoo.com - 06 Apr 2007 03:51 GMT
On Apr 5, 6:29 am, "Douglas Eagleson" <eaglesondoug...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> dt'/dc appears a solution while the solver tests always.

<rest of crackpottery snipped>

New cretin attack.
Douglas Eagleson - 06 Apr 2007 12:10 GMT
On Apr 5, 10:51 pm, karandash2...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Apr 5, 6:29 am, "Douglas Eagleson" <eaglesondoug...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> New cretin attack.

In a media solid state speed appears hihgly variable!  And my argument
was required to be refuted not lazy lam-blasted, making you the cretin.
karandash2000@yahoo.com - 06 Apr 2007 18:23 GMT
On Apr 6, 4:10 am, "Douglas Eagleson" <eaglesondoug...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Apr 5, 10:51 pm, karandash2...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> In a media solid state speed appears hihgly variable!  And my argument
> was required to be refuted not lazy lam-blasted, making you the cretin.

Persistent cretin: dt/dc is unphysical
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.