Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Chemistry / Organic Synthesis / October 2003



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Rotational energy barrier for CC triple bond

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
somebody@compusmart.ab.ca - 24 Sep 2003 14:12 GMT
I am trying to get a "quick and dirty" value for the rotational energy
barrier in a CC triple bond.  As a first guess, I would say about
twice the value for a CC double bond.   Any data  that speak
against this or for it?

Thanks in advance.

Roger
Signature

Paul J. Franklin(moderator - sci.chem.organic.synthesis)
http://organicworldwide.net/sci.chem.organic.synthesis
Georgia State University <chepjf@panther.gsu.edu>
Atlanta, GA

Uncle Al - 25 Sep 2003 20:54 GMT
> I am trying to get a "quick and dirty" value for the rotational energy
> barrier in a CC triple bond.  As a first guess, I would say about
> twice the value for a CC double bond.   Any data  that speak
> against this or for it?

 1) The CC triple bond is rigid - LCAO model with two orthogonal
pairs of overlapping pi orbitals.
 2) The CC triple bond has unhindered rotation - MO theory with a
symmetric cylinder of bonding pi-electron density.

Perhaps somebody ought to do a quadrupole moment measurement of
acetylene.  Being a synthetic organiker, my heart is with (1) but my
head is with (2).

Signature

Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"  The Net!
--
Paul J. Franklin(moderator - sci.chem.organic.synthesis)
http://organicworldwide.net/sci.chem.organic.synthesis
Georgia State University <chepjf@panther.gsu.edu>
Atlanta, GA

Bun Chau Han - 30 Sep 2003 18:10 GMT
Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message news:<bkvh6b$86d@panther.Gsu.EDU>...
> somebody@compusmart.ab.ca wrote:

> > I am trying to get a "quick and dirty" value for the rotational energy
> > barrier in a CC triple bond.  As a first guess, I would say about
> > twice the value for a CC double bond.   Any data  that speak
> > against this or for it?

>   1) The CC triple bond is rigid - LCAO model with two orthogonal
> pairs of overlapping pi orbitals.
>   2) The CC triple bond has unhindered rotation - MO theory with a
> symmetric cylinder of bonding pi-electron density.

> Perhaps somebody ought to do a quadrupole moment measurement of
> acetylene.  Being a synthetic organiker, my heart is with (1) but my
> head is with (2).

> Uncle Al
> http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
>  (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
> "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"  The Net!

Symmetry says it.  It is linear.  There is no way to tell whether you
have "rotate" that bond or not let alone the energy for such process.
so (3) there is no such kind of rotation.

bch

Signature

Paul J. Franklin(moderator - sci.chem.organic.synthesis)
http://organicworldwide.net/sci.chem.organic.synthesis
Georgia State University <chepjf@panther.gsu.edu>
Atlanta, GA

David Naugler - 30 Sep 2003 18:11 GMT
Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message news:<bkvh6b$86d@panther.Gsu.EDU>...
> somebody@compusmart.ab.ca wrote:

> > I am trying to get a "quick and dirty" value for the rotational energy
> > barrier in a CC triple bond.  As a first guess, I would say about
> > twice the value for a CC double bond.   Any data  that speak
> > against this or for it?

>   1) The CC triple bond is rigid - LCAO model with two orthogonal
> pairs of overlapping pi orbitals.
>   2) The CC triple bond has unhindered rotation - MO theory with a
> symmetric cylinder of bonding pi-electron density.

> Perhaps somebody ought to do a quadrupole moment measurement of
> acetylene.  Being a synthetic organiker, my heart is with (1) but my
> head is with (2).

Seriously though ... Rotation about a bond connotes variation of
dihedral angles. Think of ethane. How do you define a dihedral angle
in a linear system? Solve that problem and then you can talk about the
rotational energy barrier in a CC triple bond.

Signature

Paul J. Franklin(moderator - sci.chem.organic.synthesis)
http://organicworldwide.net/sci.chem.organic.synthesis
Georgia State University <chepjf@panther.gsu.edu>
Atlanta, GA

Bun Chau Han - 06 Oct 2003 16:27 GMT
Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message news:<bkvh6b$86d@panther.Gsu.EDU>...
> somebody@compusmart.ab.ca wrote:

> > I am trying to get a "quick and dirty" value for the rotational energy
> > barrier in a CC triple bond.  As a first guess, I would say about
> > twice the value for a CC double bond.   Any data  that speak
> > against this or for it?

>   1) The CC triple bond is rigid - LCAO model with two orthogonal
> pairs of overlapping pi orbitals.
>   2) The CC triple bond has unhindered rotation - MO theory with a
> symmetric cylinder of bonding pi-electron density.

> Perhaps somebody ought to do a quadrupole moment measurement of
> acetylene.  Being a synthetic organiker, my heart is with (1) but my
> head is with (2).

> Uncle Al
> http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
>  (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
> "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"  The Net!

Symmetry says it.  It is linear.  There is no way to tell whether you
have "rotate" that bond or not let alone the energy for such process.
so (3) there is no such kind of rotation.

bch

Signature

Paul J. Franklin(moderator - sci.chem.organic.synthesis)
http://organicworldwide.net/sci.chem.organic.synthesis
Georgia State University <chepjf@panther.gsu.edu>
Atlanta, GA
--
Paul J. Franklin(moderator - sci.chem.organic.synthesis)
http://organicworldwide.net/sci.chem.organic.synthesis
Georgia State University <chepjf@panther.gsu.edu>
Atlanta, GA

LOUIS - 06 Oct 2003 16:34 GMT
Not possible in acetylenic system since the two external bonds are sigma
bonds with very good rotation abilities!
CH3-C#C-CH3 will represent the problem like a car weel system...central
untwistable axis with two rolling rings.
Now you can play with a different molecule that would give you an
approximation of an intermediate barrier between C#C and C=C....
ketene familly is that intermediary.
H2C=C=CH2 <==> CH3-C#C-H

PhZ

> I am trying to get a "quick and dirty" value for the rotational energy
> barrier in a CC triple bond.  As a first guess, I would say about
> twice the value for a CC double bond.   Any data  that speak
> against this or for it?

> Thanks in advance.

> Roger

Signature

Paul J. Franklin(moderator - sci.chem.organic.synthesis)
http://organicworldwide.net/sci.chem.organic.synthesis
Georgia State University <chepjf@panther.gsu.edu>
Atlanta, GA

Uncle Al - 07 Oct 2003 18:22 GMT
Bun Chau Han wrote:

> Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message news:<bkvh6b$86d@panther.Gsu.EDU>...
> > somebody@compusmart.ab.ca wrote:

> > > I am trying to get a "quick and dirty" value for the rotational energy
> > > barrier in a CC triple bond.  As a first guess, I would say about
> > > twice the value for a CC double bond.   Any data  that speak
> > > against this or for it?

> >   1) The CC triple bond is rigid - LCAO model with two orthogonal
> > pairs of overlapping pi orbitals.
> >   2) The CC triple bond has unhindered rotation - MO theory with a
> > symmetric cylinder of bonding pi-electron density.

> > Perhaps somebody ought to do a quadrupole moment measurement of
> > acetylene.  Being a synthetic organiker, my heart is with (1) but my
> > head is with (2).


> Symmetry says it.  It is linear.  There is no way to tell whether you
> have "rotate" that bond or not let alone the energy for such process.
> so (3) there is no such kind of rotation.

The symmetry might not be quite as high as it appears, in the manner
that the two free electron pairs in H2O are not identical and
degenerate specifically because of higher order symmetry effects.  A
very good quadrupole moment measurment would be interesting (unless a
skilled theoretical chemist can show otherwise).

Signature

Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"  The Net!
--
Paul J. Franklin(moderator - sci.chem.organic.synthesis)
http://organicworldwide.net/sci.chem.organic.synthesis
Georgia State University <chepjf@panther.gsu.edu>
Atlanta, GA

somebody@compusmart.ab.ca - 07 Oct 2003 18:24 GMT
>I am trying to get a "quick and dirty" value for the rotational energy
>barrier in a CC triple bond.  As a first guess, I would say about
>twice the value for a CC double bond.   Any data  that speak
>against this or for it?

Thanks to all who replied- much appreciated.  To give a bit more
background: this question started out as a discussion in the coffee
room after a seminar.   I should have given more details: the focus of
the discussion was on the bonding situation as opposed to the
stereochemical consequences (or absence thereof) in such a rotation.

The opinions were pretty much along the lines of the comments made by
Uncle Al in his reply, and so were the owners of these opinions, i.e.
org. chemists vs. theoreticians.   My  first guess above probably
reflects my background.  Unfortunately, nobody in the coffee room had
data.  Only opinions.

I remember seeing conformational data on substituted C5 or C6 molecules
with a central (or near central) triple bond, which gave two or more
conformers.   The energy barrier was low, but then again the
conformers could arise, IMO, from a rotation around the sigma bond(s),
i.e. outside of the triple bond.

Any additional comments, preferably with data, experimental or
calculations, are still much appreciated.   I'll eventually have a
look at the library, but at the moment I cannot travel.

Roger    
Signature

Paul J. Franklin(moderator - sci.chem.organic.synthesis)
http://organicworldwide.net/sci.chem.organic.synthesis
Georgia State University <chepjf@panther.gsu.edu>
Atlanta, GA

somebody@compusmart.ab.ca - 13 Oct 2003 17:02 GMT
>I am trying to get a "quick and dirty" value for the rotational energy
>barrier in a CC triple bond.  As a first guess, I would say about
>twice the value for a CC double bond.   Any data  that speak
>against this or for it?

Thanks to all who replied- much appreciated.  To give a bit more
background: this question started out as a discussion in the coffee
room after a seminar.   I should have given more details: the focus of
the discussion was on the bonding situation as opposed to the
stereochemical consequences (or absence thereof) in such a rotation.

The opinions were pretty much along the lines of the comments made by
Uncle Al in his reply, and so were the owners of these opinions, i.e.
org. chemists vs. theoreticians.   My  first guess above probably
reflects my background.  Unfortunately, nobody in the coffee room had
data.  Only opinions.

I remember seeing conformational data on substituted C5 or C6 molecules
with a central (or near central) triple bond, which gave two or more
conformers.   The energy barrier was low, but then again the
conformers could arise, IMO, from a rotation around the sigma bond(s),
i.e. outside of the triple bond.

Any additional comments, preferably with data, experimental or
calculations, are still much appreciated.   I'll eventually have a
look at the library, but at the moment I cannot travel.

Roger    
Signature

Paul J. Franklin(moderator - sci.chem.organic.synthesis)
http://organicworldwide.net/sci.chem.organic.synthesis
Georgia State University <chepjf@panther.gsu.edu>
Atlanta, GA

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.