You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free NatScience.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Question about gravity (curved space?)
| Androcles | 24 Nov 2007 22:57 |
: > : "Androcles" <Engineer@hogwarts.physics_a> wrote in message : > news:f912j.120642$7_4.37512@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk... [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] : > So backwards and forwards on the x- y- or z-axis, but only forwards : > on the t-axis? So backwards and forwards on the x- y- or z-axis, but only forwards on the t-axis? BTW, what does "'moving' through" mean? Trains go along the track, not through the track... perhaps that's why you have so much trouble measuring their velocity.
|
| Martin Hogbin | 24 Nov 2007 22:40 |
> : "Androcles" <Engineer@hogwarts.physics_a> wrote in message > news:f912j.120642$7_4.37512@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk... [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > So backwards and forwards on the x- y- or z-axis, but only forwards > on the t-axis? Seems that way.
-- Martin Hogbin
|
| Androcles | 24 Nov 2007 22:30 |
: > : "Androcles" <Engineer@hogwarts.physics_a> wrote in message : > news:tV%1j.19682$JA1.12159@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk... [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] : : The t-axis ? So backwards and forwards on the x- y- or z-axis, but only forwards on the t-axis? BTW, what does "'moving' through" mean? Trains go along the track, not through the track... perhaps that's why you have so much trouble measuring their velocity.
|
| Martin Hogbin | 24 Nov 2007 22:17 |
> : "Androcles" <Engineer@hogwarts.physics_a> wrote in message > news:tV%1j.19682$JA1.12159@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk... [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Is that along the x, y or z axis? The t-axis ?
-- Martin Hogbin
|
| Androcles | 24 Nov 2007 21:59 |
: > : "LuckyE" <D.Lucky.E@gmail.com> wrote in message : > news:032c9b46-2ef9-4810-8af3-443551a1ba42@s6g2000prc.googlegroups.com... [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] : : Forwards. Is that along the x, y or z axis?
|
| Martin Hogbin | 24 Nov 2007 21:48 |
> : "LuckyE" <D.Lucky.E@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:032c9b46-2ef9-4810-8af3-443551a1ba42@s6g2000prc.googlegroups.com... [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Which direction? Forwards.
-- Martin Hogbin
|
| Androcles | 24 Nov 2007 20:34 |
: > Thanks for all the answers, but I still don't quite get it. Maybe if I : > ask it differently... [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] : : In spacetime you are always 'moving' through time. Which direction?
|
| Martin Hogbin | 24 Nov 2007 19:14 |
> Thanks for all the answers, but I still don't quite get it. Maybe if I > ask it differently... > > How does the curved spacetime cause an object to accelerate towards an > other object? In spacetime you are always 'moving' through time. In flat (non-curved) spacetime, as you 'move' through time you do not move through space.
Gravity curves spacetime in such a way that, as you 'move' through time you move through space.
Would you like a two dimensional example?
> Also wondering, I always read that objects always fall as fast on > earth no matter what their mass is (in vacuum), but shouldn't heavier > objects fall faster? > Maybe not measurable because the difference in mass is rather small > compared to the mass of earth but still, if you'd put 2 earths next to > each other they'd go twice as fast towards each other right? Yes, insofar as a heavy object will accelerate the Earth towards it. In other words, so the relative acieration of the two bodies is greater. However, the acceleration of the falling body relative to an inertial frame will be the same whatever its mass (in Newtonian physics).
-- Martin Hogbin
|
| LuckyE | 24 Nov 2007 09:24 |
Thanks for all the answers, but I still don't quite get it. Maybe if I ask it differently...
How does the curved spacetime cause an object to accelerate towards an other object?
Also wondering, I always read that objects always fall as fast on earth no matter what their mass is (in vacuum), but shouldn't heavier objects fall faster? Maybe not measurable because the difference in mass is rather small compared to the mass of earth but still, if you'd put 2 earths next to each other they'd go twice as fast towards each other right?
|
| LuckyE | 23 Nov 2007 08:35 |
Hi,
I was wondering, if gravity curves space, then why does it matter how fast you move through this space?
If it's only curved, the speed at which something moves through it shouldn't make a difference on it's angle should it? If it would, wouldn't that mean there's inertia which would be strange if space itself was curved (ie something moving through it would have to think it's going straight).
I'm probably just missing something but couldn't find an answer.
|
Quick links:
|
|
|