Re: Paul Andersen Lies, Contradicts Himself and Rufutes SR in One Post.

f.ck you, this is physics. Your little game has been well and truly exposed.

"Bullshit. I haven't used rotating frames at all." -- Awilson
 news:7qe8o59a5eei3iq6jteuiel2hteb69kf1v@4ax.com

"Don't try to analyse the four mirror interfrometer."-- Wilson.
news:g34n95htcbsmddo6ipnuqlp9egj8ffna17@4ax.com

"DON'T TRY TO USE ROTATING FRAMES." -- Wilson (who can't manage it).
  news:aqqqm35ka2ef6qheidr8b1qh2bi0tv1bgo@4ax.com

"A rotating frame is not a 'rotating frame'...
hahahahhahahahaha!" --Wilson
 news:mu2nm3d6urgddt8jgdnss0ddualtsrnm7n@4ax.com

"There is no doppler shift in BaTh." -- Wilson
  http://tinyurl.com/2rk695

You are a pathetic bigot, same as Andersen.

stupidity.

Forget all that. The path lengths are different as shown in the diagram at
http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-07/2-07.htm

They are effectively the same for both SR and BaTh for v<<c.

Tusselad has deliberately lied about his using the nonR frame.

His little game has been well and truly exposed.

Henry Wilson...

.......provider of free physics lessons

When you know there is an error in the above, hide it, eh? :-)
The blue and red rays enter the ring in parallel with the same energy.
The blue and red rays leave the ring in parallel with different energies.
E1 = hf1, E2 = hf2.
hence f1 <> f2.

http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/pdf/sagnac_ring.pdf
http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/pdf/four_mirror_sagnac.pdf

When you can't find an error in the above, invent one, eh? :-)

http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/images/Sagnac_Ritz.jpg
Read the text on the right side. Are the path lengths equal?

I find it amazing that you voluntarily are making such a giant
fool of yourself by lying so obviously for anybody who can read.

Doctor Ralph Rabbidge isn't very bright, is he? :-)

Paul insisted he was using the inertial frame...then, on his website,  he
claimed that the path lengths according to BaTh were 2piR. They clearly are
not. They are 2piR +/-vt in the nonR frame..which is the one that matters.

If that is true, then the same path lengths are 2piR according to SR because it
uses the same procedure as BaTh to calculate them.

Andersen has been caught out well and truly. He has been consistently wrong
before. I hope he has the decency to admit defeat and apologise to me for his
being so clueless.

Henry Wilson...

.......provider of free physics lessons

Every time I post.  Unlike you who only lies and shows your stupidity.

When are you going to say something intelligent?

Henry Wilson...

.......provider of free physics lessons

Where did paul say all this that you quoted?  it sounds like yet another
Henry lie.

All I see is Paul correctly saying how many wavelength are in the ring at
any time in each direction.  He is perfectly correct .. the same number of
wavelength are in each direction at any time.

Yes folks!
For his great achievment, Paul has just been awarded the prestigious Norwegian
WHALE BLUBBER MEDAL for being the first of his countrymen to prove Einstein
wrong.
At the presentation ceremony, Paul admitted that he had not known what he was
doing at the time, "In all honesty, I didn't realise I had jumped frames, said
Paul, "Here are my actual written words, (quote): In all cases the calculations
will be made in the non rotating inertial frame where the centre of the ring is
stationary (end of quote).  Then I unwittingly went on to say that in ballistic
theory, the path lengths of both rays were always 2piR.
"I didn't realise that this applied equally to SR's ring gyro analysis, too. SR
requires different path lengths just as BaTh does". "I'm terribly sorry for
Einstein...but also very proud and somewhat relieved", said Paul, " I never
really believed the nonsense anyway".

Henry Wilson...

.......provider of free physics lessons