You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free NatScience.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Paul Andersen Lies, Contradicts Himself and Rufutes SR in One Post.
| eric gisse | 27 Feb 2010 06:57 |
>>>>> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:51:47 -0000, "Androcles"
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> At a university ranked no 17 in the world and another ranked 47.
...and which universities would those be? What years did you graduate and
what were the obtained certifications?
> From which episode of startrek did you learn yours?
>
> Henry Wilson...
>
> .......provider of free physics lessons |
| Henry Wilson DSc | 27 Feb 2010 05:04 |
>>>> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:51:47 -0000, "Androcles"
>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>Its' a simple question, Henry. Where were you taught physics?
At a university ranked no 17 in the world and another ranked 47.
From which episode of startrek did you learn yours?
Henry Wilson...
.......provider of free physics lessons
|
| eric gisse | 27 Feb 2010 04:29 |
>>> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:51:47 -0000, "Androcles"
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> When are you going to say sometyhing intelligent?
Its' a simple question, Henry. Where were you taught physics?
> Henry Wilson...
>
> .......provider of free physics lessons |
| Henry Wilson DSc | 27 Feb 2010 00:40 |
>> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:51:47 -0000, "Androcles"
>>>>>> When you can't find an error in the above, invent one, eh? :-)
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>...and where were you taught physics?
When are you going to say sometyhing intelligent?
Henry Wilson...
.......provider of free physics lessons
|
| eric gisse | 26 Feb 2010 23:36 |
>>> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:56:36 -0000, "Androcles"
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> ...and physics is what isn't taught to pommie engineers....
...and where were you taught physics?
> Henry Wilson...
>
> .......provider of free physics lessons |
| Henry Wilson DSc | 26 Feb 2010 23:04 |
>> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:56:36 -0000, "Androcles"
>>>> When you can't find an error in the above, invent one, eh? :-)
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>f.ck you, this is physics.
...and physics is what isn't taught to pommie engineers....
Henry Wilson...
.......provider of free physics lessons
|
| Androcles | 26 Feb 2010 21:51 |
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:56:36 -0000, "Androcles"
> <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics_u>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Forget all that.
f.ck you, this is physics. Your little game has been well and truly exposed.
"Bullshit. I haven't used rotating frames at all." -- Awilson
news:7qe8o59a5eei3iq6jteuiel2hteb69kf1v@4ax.com
"Don't try to analyse the four mirror interfrometer."-- Wilson.
news:g34n95htcbsmddo6ipnuqlp9egj8ffna17@4ax.com
"DON'T TRY TO USE ROTATING FRAMES." -- Wilson (who can't manage it).
news:aqqqm35ka2ef6qheidr8b1qh2bi0tv1bgo@4ax.com
"A rotating frame is not a 'rotating frame'...
hahahahhahahahaha!" --Wilson
news:mu2nm3d6urgddt8jgdnss0ddualtsrnm7n@4ax.com
"There is no doppler shift in BaTh." -- Wilson
http://tinyurl.com/2rk695
You are a pathetic bigot, same as Andersen.
|
| Henry Wilson DSc | 26 Feb 2010 21:16 |
>>> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:55:26 +1100, "Inertial"<relatively@rest.com> stupidity.
>>> Paul insisted he was using the inertial frame...then, on his website, he
>>> claimed that the path lengths according to BaTh were 2piR.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>E1 = hf1, E2 = hf2.
>hence f1 <> f2.
Forget all that. The path lengths are different as shown in the diagram at
http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-07/2-07.htm
They are effectively the same for both SR and BaTh for v<<c.
Tusselad has deliberately lied about his using the nonR frame.
His little game has been well and truly exposed.
Henry Wilson...
.......provider of free physics lessons
|
| Androcles | 26 Feb 2010 19:56 |
>>>>>> Yes folks!
>>>>>> For his great achievment, Paul has just been awarded the prestigious
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>
> When you can't find an error in the above, invent one, eh? :-)
When you know there is an error in the above, hide it, eh? :-)
The blue and red rays enter the ring in parallel with the same energy.
The blue and red rays leave the ring in parallel with different energies.
E1 = hf1, E2 = hf2.
hence f1 <> f2.
|
| Paul B. Andersen | 26 Feb 2010 19:45 |
>>>>> Yes folks!
>>>>> For his great achievment, Paul has just been awarded the prestigious
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> Paul insisted he was using the inertial frame...then, on his website, he
> claimed that the path lengths according to BaTh were 2piR.
http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/pdf/sagnac_ring.pdf
http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/pdf/four_mirror_sagnac.pdf
When you can't find an error in the above, invent one, eh? :-)
http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/images/Sagnac_Ritz.jpg
Read the text on the right side. Are the path lengths equal?
I find it amazing that you voluntarily are making such a giant
fool of yourself by lying so obviously for anybody who can read.
Doctor Ralph Rabbidge isn't very bright, is he? :-)
 Signature
Paul
http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/
|
| Henry Wilson DSc | 26 Feb 2010 09:20 |
>>>> Yes folks!
>>>> For his great achievment, Paul has just been awarded the prestigious
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
>Every time I post. Unlike you who only lies and shows your stupidity.
Paul insisted he was using the inertial frame...then, on his website, he
claimed that the path lengths according to BaTh were 2piR. They clearly are
not. They are 2piR +/-vt in the nonR frame..which is the one that matters.
If that is true, then the same path lengths are 2piR according to SR because it
uses the same procedure as BaTh to calculate them.
Andersen has been caught out well and truly. He has been consistently wrong
before. I hope he has the decency to admit defeat and apologise to me for his
being so clueless.
Henry Wilson...
.......provider of free physics lessons
|
| Inertial | 26 Feb 2010 03:55 |
>>> Yes folks!
>>> For his great achievment, Paul has just been awarded the prestigious
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> When are you going to say something intelligent?
Every time I post. Unlike you who only lies and shows your stupidity.
|
| Henry Wilson DSc | 26 Feb 2010 03:46 |
>> Yes folks!
>> For his great achievment, Paul has just been awarded the prestigious
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>any time in each direction. He is perfectly correct .. the same number of
>wavelength are in each direction at any time.
When are you going to say something intelligent?
Henry Wilson...
.......provider of free physics lessons
|
| Inertial | 25 Feb 2010 22:50 |
> Yes folks!
> For his great achievment, Paul has just been awarded the prestigious
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> never
> really believed the nonsense anyway".
Where did paul say all this that you quoted? it sounds like yet another
Henry lie.
All I see is Paul correctly saying how many wavelength are in the ring at
any time in each direction. He is perfectly correct .. the same number of
wavelength are in each direction at any time.
|
| Henry Wilson DSc | 25 Feb 2010 19:37 |
Yes folks!
For his great achievment, Paul has just been awarded the prestigious Norwegian
WHALE BLUBBER MEDAL for being the first of his countrymen to prove Einstein
wrong.
At the presentation ceremony, Paul admitted that he had not known what he was
doing at the time, "In all honesty, I didn't realise I had jumped frames, said
Paul, "Here are my actual written words, (quote): In all cases the calculations
will be made in the non rotating inertial frame where the centre of the ring is
stationary (end of quote). Then I unwittingly went on to say that in ballistic
theory, the path lengths of both rays were always 2piR.
"I didn't realise that this applied equally to SR's ring gyro analysis, too. SR
requires different path lengths just as BaTh does". "I'm terribly sorry for
Einstein...but also very proud and somewhat relieved", said Paul, " I never
really believed the nonsense anyway".
Henry Wilson...
.......provider of free physics lessons
|
Quick links:
|
|
|
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage