Re: Timetable & Gravitational forces of Big Bang perplexing?

Fireball is photons and photons are a radiation, look it up.

I've made mistakes and been corrected politely otherwise I wouldn't be
posting questions but your replies were incorrect, insulting and
therefore have no merit.

I called it radiation and energy....you went crazy and insisted that on
ONLY the wording of "Specific energy" and not energy nor radiation,
your own link ALSO calls it a dense FIREBALL (you're the one who can't
read properly) just beside it.

Hubba itz you again are you still over focusing using the Hubba(Hubble)
Space Telescope?

Why are you so fixated on only your link here's another an READ what it
says but first put down that Telescope:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

QUOTE:

"As the Universe cooled, matter gradually stopped moving
relativistically and its rest mass energy density came to
gravitationally dominate that of radiation. After about 300,000 years
the electrons and nuclei combined into atoms (mostly hydrogen); hence
the radiation decoupled from matter and continued through space largely
unimpeded. This relic radiation is the cosmic microwave background."

Your comprehension is appalling.  That is not what the link I gave said.
Consider kindergarten finger-painting.

Bill

a) The 0 to 300,000 year after the Bang for energy to form into
gluons/electrons/plasma "seems" abnormally small?

For the sake of simplicity we'll call the Big Bang's energy: "RAYS"

1. According to rules for Time Paradox and Relativity, time had no
meaning for the "RAYS" wrt to each other (same speed but angled away
from each other like rays of star light which is similar to say two
twins moving the same speed but at different directions(angles) wrt to
each other)  but these "RAYS" had meaning wrt to their origin (the
singularity)?

2. We still have in common the singularity as the yard stick (distance)
to measure the travel time of these RAYS since we are still propulsing
wrt to the singularity and therefore 300,000 years seems abnormally too
small?

Meaning the twins (RAYS) come back younger in age (even though they
travelled at different directions/angles) but according to our time
clock it took the twins (and RAYS) forever to go and come back?

------------------------------------------------------------

*****Even more important****

We couldn't still be moving at the speed of light wrt to the
singularity...correct ....and since this energy substantially slowed
down in only 300,000 when it had near zero mass therefore shouldn't the
present massive bodies in space have already completely slowed down
and/or have come to a reversed big crunch???