Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Biology
BiologyBotanyMicrobiologyEntomologyEvolutionPaleontology
Chemistry
General ChemistryAnalytical ChemistryElectrochemistryOrganic Synthesis
Earth Science
GeologyMineralogyOceanographyMeteorologyEarthquakes
Physics
General PhysicsResearchRelativityParticle PhysicsElectromagnetismFusionOpticsAcousticsNew Theories

Natural Science Forum / Earth Science / Earthquakes / February 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
More Stuff on the Canary Islands Tsunami04 Feb 2005 22:11 GMT31
http://www.underreported.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=1124
Felix Tilley
1-800-555-LART
Do not spam me.
More Indian Ocean Tsunami News.04 Feb 2005 07:55 GMT1
I found this link mentioned in an article in our Faculty and
Staff newspaper from Jan. 31:
 http://uscnews.usc.edu/tsunami
One feature is a link to the journal notes of a USC scientist, Dr. Jose
New evidence indicates biggest extinction wasn't caused by asteroid or comet04 Feb 2005 04:49 GMT41
In Message 50, asetnil wrote: ". . . . Everything in geology and
paleontology
suggests steady motion that is usually too slow to see in a lifetime,
with the exception of earthquakes . . . "
Re: LAT: Ancient knowledge saved endangered tribes from the tsunami03 Feb 2005 22:26 GMT1
I read this at the time it was published.  My thoughts were how these
ancient cultures could protect themselves when those in India could not.  
I also thought of jay stevens,aka dr. jai etc., and his huge failure to
predict anything about the event, but that is par for the course ...
Geospace HS10 1Hz Geophone03 Feb 2005 21:07 GMT2
Can anyone tell me exactly what the
screw adjustment on the top of this
geophone is supposed to do ?
The makers of this device are intolerant
Near the Coast of Ecuador!03 Feb 2005 17:33 GMT5
Quite a few quakes in the "Near the Coast of Ecuador" region!
Updated as of Tue Jan 25 02:14:40 UTC 2005.  DATE-(UTC)-TIME Latitude
Longitude Depth Magnitude Comments
yyyy/mm/dd hh:mm:ss degrees degrees km
New evidence indicates biggest extinction wasn't caused by asteroid or03 Feb 2005 05:03 GMT2
In Message 33 Wraithmonk wrote:  ". . . . Why don't you keep it in one
thread, instead of posting new messages & starting *new* threads?"
It has all been completely accidental, this new thread and my recent
mispostings to the main thread and so on.
New evidence indicates biggest extinction wasn't caused by asteroid or03 Feb 2005 05:00 GMT3
In Messages 30, 31, Bob Officer and George of the jungle wrote: ". . .
. The ejecta is particles of earth and rock...

>Pick up a rock and throw it with a good amount of force into a nearly
New evidence indicates biggest extinction wasn't caused by asteroid or comet03 Feb 2005 04:46 GMT1
The Ward et al PTB scenario which I wrote earlier was decisive in my
putting a PTB date on my super huge impact, is consistent with,
corroborates my super huge geyser explanation of what happened to the
MISSING PTB EJECTA LAYER.
New evidence indicates biggest extinction wasn't caused by asteroid or comet03 Feb 2005 03:40 GMT1
I have just posted something relevant to this theme to its other branch:
"What happened to the ejecta? Why hasn't more than a buckyball-noble
gas trace of the PTB ejecta been found? . . . .
 Very very very good questions . . . . Gosh, I am so glad I got to
New evidence indicates biggest extinction wasn't caused by asteroid or comet03 Feb 2005 03:39 GMT1
In Message 94, George wrote:  ". . . . An impact large enough to have
carved out an ocean basin certainly would
leave enough evidence behind to demonstrate that it occurred . . . ."
Yes, such as those globally distributed fullerines/buckyballs
State of the Union03 Feb 2005 03:30 GMT3
So far it's just a bunch of Titanium tungued circle talk and
pipe dreams.
Tangents are infinite in all of natures
universes constantly and at random.
New evidence indicates biggest extinction wasn't caused by asteroid or comet03 Feb 2005 03:23 GMT1
In Message 94, George wrote:
". . . . you earlier suggested that an object such as shoemaker-levy
could produce the results you infer.  Yet I have shown you that that
object was only 2 km in diameter prior to its break up, and even
New evidence indicates biggest extinction wasn't caused by asteroid or03 Feb 2005 01:50 GMT7
In Message 17 I wrote:
"In Message 13, Skywise wrote:">   SERM is the acronym for Supercrater
Etalon Resonance Manifestation,
> as explained in my www.nodrift.com ebook Volume 4, papers 5-12."
Wellington, NZ, 5.402 Feb 2005 20:48 GMT2
And there's nothing strange about the weather in New Zealand (normal
summer conditions)......
http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Shaken-but-not-damaged-54-quake-hits-NZ/2005
/02/01/1107020370823.html

Shaken but not damaged: 5.4 quake hits NZ
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 January, 2005
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.