| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| More Stuff on the Canary Islands Tsunami | 04 Feb 2005 22:11 GMT | 31 |
http://www.underreported.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=1124 Felix Tilley 1-800-555-LART Do not spam me.
|
| More Indian Ocean Tsunami News. | 04 Feb 2005 07:55 GMT | 1 |
I found this link mentioned in an article in our Faculty and Staff newspaper from Jan. 31: http://uscnews.usc.edu/tsunami One feature is a link to the journal notes of a USC scientist, Dr. Jose
|
| New evidence indicates biggest extinction wasn't caused by asteroid or comet | 04 Feb 2005 04:49 GMT | 41 |
In Message 50, asetnil wrote: ". . . . Everything in geology and paleontology suggests steady motion that is usually too slow to see in a lifetime, with the exception of earthquakes . . . "
|
| Re: LAT: Ancient knowledge saved endangered tribes from the tsunami | 03 Feb 2005 22:26 GMT | 1 |
I read this at the time it was published. My thoughts were how these ancient cultures could protect themselves when those in India could not. I also thought of jay stevens,aka dr. jai etc., and his huge failure to predict anything about the event, but that is par for the course ...
|
| Geospace HS10 1Hz Geophone | 03 Feb 2005 21:07 GMT | 2 |
Can anyone tell me exactly what the screw adjustment on the top of this geophone is supposed to do ? The makers of this device are intolerant
|
| Near the Coast of Ecuador! | 03 Feb 2005 17:33 GMT | 5 |
Quite a few quakes in the "Near the Coast of Ecuador" region! Updated as of Tue Jan 25 02:14:40 UTC 2005. DATE-(UTC)-TIME Latitude Longitude Depth Magnitude Comments yyyy/mm/dd hh:mm:ss degrees degrees km
|
| New evidence indicates biggest extinction wasn't caused by asteroid or | 03 Feb 2005 05:03 GMT | 2 |
In Message 33 Wraithmonk wrote: ". . . . Why don't you keep it in one thread, instead of posting new messages & starting *new* threads?" It has all been completely accidental, this new thread and my recent mispostings to the main thread and so on.
|
| New evidence indicates biggest extinction wasn't caused by asteroid or | 03 Feb 2005 05:00 GMT | 3 |
In Messages 30, 31, Bob Officer and George of the jungle wrote: ". . . . The ejecta is particles of earth and rock...
>Pick up a rock and throw it with a good amount of force into a nearly |
| New evidence indicates biggest extinction wasn't caused by asteroid or comet | 03 Feb 2005 04:46 GMT | 1 |
The Ward et al PTB scenario which I wrote earlier was decisive in my putting a PTB date on my super huge impact, is consistent with, corroborates my super huge geyser explanation of what happened to the MISSING PTB EJECTA LAYER.
|
| New evidence indicates biggest extinction wasn't caused by asteroid or comet | 03 Feb 2005 03:40 GMT | 1 |
I have just posted something relevant to this theme to its other branch: "What happened to the ejecta? Why hasn't more than a buckyball-noble gas trace of the PTB ejecta been found? . . . . Very very very good questions . . . . Gosh, I am so glad I got to
|
| New evidence indicates biggest extinction wasn't caused by asteroid or comet | 03 Feb 2005 03:39 GMT | 1 |
In Message 94, George wrote: ". . . . An impact large enough to have carved out an ocean basin certainly would leave enough evidence behind to demonstrate that it occurred . . . ." Yes, such as those globally distributed fullerines/buckyballs
|
| State of the Union | 03 Feb 2005 03:30 GMT | 3 |
So far it's just a bunch of Titanium tungued circle talk and pipe dreams. Tangents are infinite in all of natures universes constantly and at random.
|
| New evidence indicates biggest extinction wasn't caused by asteroid or comet | 03 Feb 2005 03:23 GMT | 1 |
In Message 94, George wrote: ". . . . you earlier suggested that an object such as shoemaker-levy could produce the results you infer. Yet I have shown you that that object was only 2 km in diameter prior to its break up, and even
|
| New evidence indicates biggest extinction wasn't caused by asteroid or | 03 Feb 2005 01:50 GMT | 7 |
In Message 17 I wrote: "In Message 13, Skywise wrote:"> SERM is the acronym for Supercrater Etalon Resonance Manifestation,
> as explained in my www.nodrift.com ebook Volume 4, papers 5-12." |
| Wellington, NZ, 5.4 | 02 Feb 2005 20:48 GMT | 2 |
And there's nothing strange about the weather in New Zealand (normal summer conditions)...... http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Shaken-but-not-damaged-54-quake-hits-NZ/2005 /02/01/1107020370823.html Shaken but not damaged: 5.4 quake hits NZ
|